Not By Works

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E

EleventhHour

Guest
So the mafia guy that murders is one sin. Not a lifestyle unless other sins are involved? Is that what you’re saying
This is really getting silly now... you remind of someone on here who used to like to try corner people too....hmmmm...just sayin.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
And yet immoral people do moral things. Jesus states that very clearly.
Thank you
I think my point was clear about people leading a moral life.
It means that their behaviour is such that it conforms well to the moral code which can give the "appearance" of an inward new life.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
Poor John the apostle John, Paul, Peter, Jude, etc. they spent a lot of time talking about sin too
They did indeed... in contrast to the glorious work of Christ Jesus...is that what you are doing??? hmmm
 
Dec 6, 2019
1,206
691
113
Thank you
I think my point was clear about people leading a moral life.
It means that their behaviour is such that it conforms well to the moral code which can give the "appearance" of an inward new life.
I didnt say amoral. I said rejecting Jesus is immoral. There is a difference

They do not live AMORAL lives, but you cannot say someone is morally upright if they reject Jesus
 
Dec 6, 2019
1,206
691
113
If anyone contrary to eternal security is reading, I hold to eternal security. It is not a license to sin, when understood
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
I didnt say amoral. I said rejecting Jesus is immoral. There is a difference

They do not live AMORAL lives, but you cannot say someone is morally upright if they reject Jesus
I know the difference.

Many people have never heard the Gospel or have yet to hear the Gospel so I disagree with you stringing the two together.

And morality is not to be confused with righteousness.. and not debating this further

Except to state you seem to want to prove the dogma of preservation of the saints over and over ...it is the ongoing theme of all you posts...however you are unwilling to recognize that a person's justified status is an inward reality not always outwardly manifested.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
If anyone contrary to eternal security is reading, I hold to eternal security. It is not a license to sin, when understood
The does mean perseverance of the saints is correct either.

The fact that you have defend OSAS by stating it is not a license to sin tells me quite a bit.