Did you read my question?
Yes, I did but obviously you didn't carefully read my prior posts. I clearly stated that there would be no more dancing around the question as to whether or not you subscribe to Serpent Seed and I was serious.
Did you read my question?
Does Serpent seed mean that satan is the father of Cain?Yes, I did but obviously you didn't carefully read my prior posts. I clearly stated that there would be no more dancing around the question as to whether or not you subscribe to Serpent Seed and I was serious.
Does Serpent seed mean that satan is the father of Cain?
Does Serpent seed mean that satan is the father of Cain?
This is an interesting topic because Genesis 3:15Serpent Seed takes extreme liberties with a passage in Genesis to claim that the Serpent (Satan) and Eve "knew" each other in the biblical sense and the end result was Cain.
Which flat denies Adam KNOWING Eve and the resulting birth of Cain and ABEL.....I personally think the language shows twins....based upon how it is stated......Serpent Seed takes extreme liberties with a passage in Genesis to claim that the Serpent (Satan) and Eve "knew" each other in the biblical sense and the end result was Cain.
This is an interesting topic because Genesis 3:15
And I will put enmity
Between you and the woman,
And between YOUR (satan) seed and her Seed;
He shall bruise your head,
And you shall bruise His heel.”
I personally believe there is, and will be, not only a spiritual, but physical seed of satan. (anti-christ) However Scripture itself says Adam is Cain's father: Genesis 4:1 Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, and said, “I have acquired a man from the Lord.”
So I don't see how someone can say satan is the physical father of Cain.
They only use one line from the passage... typical.
To me it is idiotic to say that Satan had "relations" with Eve....equally stupid is the idea of some chic called Lilith or something like that ....
Serpent Seed takes extreme liberties with a passage in Genesis to claim that the Serpent (Satan) and Eve "knew" each other in the biblical sense and the end result was Cain.
To expand on my answer a bit, this heresy has evolved differently over the centuries as to who the descendants of Cain are today. This heresy is routinely held to by some racist communities (but not exclusively by) to justify their racism by claiming that Cain's descendants are either today's Jews or persons of African descent. In other words, not all Serpent Seed adherents are racist.
It's earliest known presentation in writing was in both the Gnostic Gospel of Philip (300AD) and Jewish Midrashic texts (roughly 400AD) but it clearly existed prior to then because Iranaeus (200AD) and other early church fathers rejected it as heresy.
Typically when it comes to heresy (as Solomon would say) there is nothing new under the sun.
I said, because CAIN'S lineage was wiped out in the flood! That crap is in more churches than many know.....
Some adherents of Serpent Seed likewise reduce the flood account in Genesis to being allegory or figurative rather than literal in order to get around that problem.
Brother, that got me excited!! Jesus is coming, no doubt about it!!
God bless sir.
That’s a “yes”.I asked first. I have stated my position.
You are banned!You are funny.
NO ONE here has said that or even implied that....so WHEN you accuse us of that....it is a moot accusation.....get over it....written to believers --> WHERE SIN ABOUNDS, GRACE ABOUNDS THE MORE.
Some adherents of Serpent Seed likewise reduce the flood account in Genesis to being allegory or figurative rather than literal in order to get around that problem.
I have come to the conclusion when people do not answer, they are afraid to, knowing their answer will do some damage to their system.Yeah....people do not answer questions with a question....that is indeed rude.....so....it seems the answer to my question is a yes, since you are tap dancing around the issue.....
how Long will you continue to slander what you do not know?Do you really think that what Jesus did on the cross was a licence to sin?