No - my comments are laser focused.
You said "
amazing how all you legalists ( and the judeaizers) use 1st John to attempt to prove salvation by command keeping.
but, as usual, you fail to mention that John said , in this very letter, that the commands are to " believe in the name of the Son, and love one another"."
Notice how your first line and your second line don't gel. In the first you allude to command keeping not being a requirement. In the second you introduce a command. So which is it?
Are you to love one another (Y/N)? You would have to admit Y. And this is a command.
You are now command keeping. And just to put icing on the top, I showed you the true meaning of love one another in post nr356 (hint* you can see these same commands in Exodus 20). So if your command, is the same as Exodus 20, then you are a command keeper. Just like John said. You are upholding the law by loving your neighbour, which is part of your salvation.
I chose to extricate myself from the thread "Not by Works" as that has become so warped and distorted that it lost all edification. I bet right now there is a gaggle of geese slamming each other, feathers flying. Not edifying to those wanting to learn the truth. Let them have their forum. All 52673826 pages of it.
In terms of salvation not loseable, start here again.
https://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/apostasy-101.189485/#post-4121313 - you say as long as one believes. Well I say believes in INCLUSIVE of obedience. You kick against that requirement. I say
you have already admitted it "
but, as usual, you fail to mention that John said , in this very letter, that the commands are to " believe in the name of the Son, and love one another".