So lets bring this back to OSAS doctrine, and whether this holds water. We can see from the above that this entire answer is in in direct relation to the question of a believer (Peter). And verse 35 is ALSO directed to Peter specifically, as well as all believers generally. Could Peter’s sins also be re-imputed to him if he, after having received forgiveness, had not the graces to extend this to his fellow man?
I bring back the original questions.
I bring back the original questions.
- Was Peter a believer? Yes.
- Is this parable applicable to Peter, as well as others? Yes.
- Should Peter forgive others? Yes
- What happens to Peter should he refuse to forgive (remember he is a believer)?
- Should you perhaps reconsider the OSAS doctrine?
Those who are unforgiving from the heart in such small matters show they are unfit to receive God’s forgiveness. Failure to forgive in such a small matter shows that this person has not fully embraced God’s grace and forgiveness, hence the term, "wicked servant," which is not descriptive of a genuine believer. The fact that this person is called a "servant" does not necessarily mean they were saved. The children of Israel were referred to as "the Lord’s servants," but they were not all saved. In Leviticus 25:55, we read - For the children of Israel are servants to Me; they are My servants whom I brought out of the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God. In Isaiah 43:10, we read - You are my witnesses, says the LORD, my servant, whom I have chosen.. Obviously, Peter did not have an unforgiving heart, which demonstrates he was a true believer, so there is nothing to reconsider about the OSAS doctrine. The real question is, "are we truly saved to begin with." If we are, then we will demonstrate it by our actions.
- 2
- 1
- Show all