I already got that bro. Perhaps you misunderstood my post and its intent?
Probably
I already got that bro. Perhaps you misunderstood my post and its intent?
Probably![]()
i offer biggest verse, that even says Holy Spirit is resisted, uses those verses look guys:Drawing men to Christ is NOT compulsion. If God were to compel men to be saved all of Israel -- the ELECT NATION OF GOD -- would have been saved. So we have more of your false theology because you do not believe the Bible.
Now take note from Scripture that God and Christ do not compel men to be saved:
O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! (Mt 23:37)
Did the Jews resist the Holy Spirit? Absolutely. This is one verse and there are many others. IRRESISTIBLE GRACE IS A MAN-MADE MYTH.
The Calvinist, RT answer? Those were the non-elect! TULIP is therefore true.i offer biggest verse, that even says Holy Spirit is resisted, uses those verses look guys:
Acts 7:51 Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye.
ah true. bad argument from me. but my counter to that answer would be: doesnt everyone resist the Holy Ghost then? its my same answer for the verses talking about pharisees etc. being blinded so they dont turn and be saved. but why does God have to blind totally depraved people with stone hearts who cant turn anyway? see it doesnt make any sense in calvinist setting.The Calvinist, RT answer? Those were the non-elect! TULIP is therefore true.How many souls lost to that devilish flowering of false teaching?
I have a friend who once said, you can find using select scripture why you should buy a car tomorrow, if you're willing to work at cutting scripture to pieces to gain God's OK to buy a car you really can't afford. They call it the, God Did It sermon.ah true. bad argument from me. but my counter to that answer would be: doesnt everyone resist the Holy Ghost then? its my same answer for the verses talking about pharisees etc. being blinded so they dont turn and be saved. but why does God have to blind totally depraved people with stone hearts who cant turn anyway? see it doesnt make any sense in calvinist setting.
jews were never calvinists. even today they believe in freedom of will
i offer biggest verse, that even says Holy Spirit is resisted, uses those verses look guys:
Acts 7:51 Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye.
"believeth" is not an act of the will.
You cannot make yourself believe.
I did... I chose to believe, therefore it was my will to believe. If I chose not to believe, that would also be my will. "Whomsoever believeth" is a choice, its a decision everyone makes.. If belief is not an act of ones will, then John 3:16 is irrelevant , and no one should be held accountable for accepting or rejecting the gospel... jmo
ah true. bad argument from me. but my counter to that answer would be: doesnt everyone resist the Holy Ghost then? its my same answer for the verses talking about pharisees etc. being blinded so they dont turn and be saved. but why does God have to blind totally depraved people with stone hearts who cant turn anyway? see it doesnt make any sense in calvinist setting.
jews were never calvinists. even today they believe in freedom of will
Irresistible love?
I would say if Love was at all in the equation of TULIP or RT, Calvinism, those traditions of man would not have first made their god a moral monster that, prior to creating all things, made a list of people whom he'd force into his grace because he first made them Totally Depraved unable to enter his grace through faith alone.
All this predicated on the determinism, by the way.
Then TULIP's god created the Heavens and the Earth, and on as it goes in Genesis. Knowing, that in order for those names in that book of life to come to fruition according to his plan, he would have to insure Eve sinned, and then Adam. And then he'd have to let Adam take the fall for his action of eating forbidden fruit TULIP's god planted so as to make it available to eat. Thereby violating the first law of god.
Thou shalt not eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
But TULIP's god being all knowing, knew that would happen. Had to. Otherwise, the names on the list of his predetermined pre-selected list would mean nothing.
TULIP is all its god all the time. Because its god made man in its image and likeness.....TOTALLY DEPRAVED!
As planned.
That's why TULIP is the antithesis of the actual God.
Not everyone who says to me , Lord, Lord....False prophets, false teachers, will find they are not in the Kingdom.
And Calvin, Piper, MacArthur, who shows he believes what he preaches as one Totally Depraved who, from the pulpit, dedicates entire sermons to attacking other preachers not of his beliefs.
Sound familiar?
Low hanging fruit. Upon the pastors and disciples of TULIP alike.
God have mercy.
Can you imagine living a God given life....having no choice?
this is something new to consider i havent heard this argument before. but from looking at it, its true that drawing in bible isnt like advertising and trying to charm or woo people in. its more forceful. like that one parable Jesus says compel them to come lolz i bet the catholic church loved that one for the crusadesIrresistible grace does not teach that ppl can not resist the Holy Spirit, but that they will not resist it all the way unto death. That at the right time, God will effectually draw them to Himself.
When you see the Greek word used for 'draw', you see it means this: to drag, to draw, haul, drew. The Greek word is ἑλκύω 'helkuo. So when the word 'draw' is used, it is used in a way to mean effectiveness in doing the drawing. In John 18:10 John wrote Simon Peter then, having a sword, drew it and struck the high priest’s slave, and cut off his right ear; and the slave’s name was Malchus. Now, 'drew' in that verse is helkuo, which means when Peter drew his sword, the sword was effectually drawn from its scabbard. Then John also wrote in John 21:11 Simon Peter went up and drew the net to land, full of large fish, a hundred and fifty-three; and although there were so many, the net was not torn. So, when Peter drew(helkuo) the net, he effectually drew(dragged) it to shore. That is what helkuo means. It is the same word used in John 12:32 when John quoted the Christ saying "And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to Myself.” So, if the Christ is doing helkuo to all mankind w/o exception, then all mankind w/o exception is being effectually drawn(dragged) to Him, therefore, He is saving all mankind w/o exception. That is why we aver that John 12:32 does not teach Him drawing all mankind w/o exception, because helkuo teaches those drawn will come to Him. And we both know that not all mankind w/o exception will be saved.![]()
Drawing men to Christ is NOT compulsion. If God were to compel men to be saved all of Israel -- the ELECT NATION OF GOD -- would have been saved. So we have more of your false theology because you do not believe the Bible.
Now take note from Scripture that God and Christ do not compel men to be saved:
O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! (Mt 23:37)
Did the Jews resist the Holy Spirit? Absolutely. This is one verse and there are many others. IRRESISTIBLE GRACE IS A MAN-MADE MYTH.
The Calvinist, RT answer? Those were the non-elect! TULIP is therefore true.How many souls lost to that devilish flowering of false teaching?
I did... I chose to believe, therefore it was my will to believe. If I chose not to believe, that would also be my will. "Whomsoever believeth" is a choice, its a decision everyone makes.. If belief is not an act of ones will, then John 3:16 is irrelevant , and no one should be held accountable for accepting or rejecting the gospel... jmo
I’ve seen it as it can be used to compel with an inward power.this is something new to consider i havent heard this argument before. but from looking at it, its true that drawing in bible isnt like advertising and trying to charm or woo people in. its more forceful. like that one parable Jesus says compel them to come lolz i bet the catholic church loved that one for the crusades
but draw seems to be powerful word, more like drag.
well i cant disagree with what it means. i also dont believe everyone is saved scripture is clear on that. is there any verses that say anyone thats drawn automatically is saved or comes? if there is some verse that says people drawn will come, and a verse that says Jesus draws all men, but not all are saved we know. then that proves all there must mean something else i would agree with that then.I’ve seen it as it can be used to compel with an inward power.
Yes, God doesn’t woo ppl like we would a person for a date. I can find nowhere where helkuo means anything other than what I showed lead. Lead, compel can also be used. So in John 12:32, helkuo is used for ‘draw’. And if He is drawing(helkuo) everybody w/o exception, there everybody w/o exception is saved. Helkuo is that powerful of a word. It is also used in John 6:44 where it say “No man can come unto Me except my Father draws(helkuo) them. Again, it’s a forceful drawing, an effective drawing, as He doesn’t drag us kicking and screaming against our wills. He changes our natures, passing from death unto life. And in doing this, our wills are also changed. Unless the nature is changed in a lost person, the will will never change. Grace must first be wrought upon the heart before a change in nature and will takes place.
Yes: John 6:35-40. Note particularly John 6:44, those drawn will be raised.well i cant disagree with what it means. i also dont believe everyone is saved scripture is clear on that. is there any verses that say anyone thats drawn automatically is saved or comes? if there is some verse that says people drawn will come, and a verse that says Jesus draws all men, but not all are saved we know. then that proves all there must mean something else i would agree with that then.
John 6:44 is crystal clear. No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up on the last day. Notice how He said no one can come unless the Father draws(helkuo) them. And that word also means to literally drag off. Not that He does this against our will while we’re kicking and screaming, but that He effectively draws us to Himself. Also notice these He draws(helkuo) He will raise on the last day. This means those He draws to Himself, He also saves, and they will be raised on the last day.well i cant disagree with what it means. i also dont believe everyone is saved scripture is clear on that. is there any verses that say anyone thats drawn automatically is saved or comes? if there is some verse that says people drawn will come, and a verse that says Jesus draws all men, but not all are saved we know. then that proves all there must mean something else i would agree with that then.