Dishonest scales are an abomination to the LORD, but a just weight is His delight.(Proverbs 11:1) honest scales are accurate & consistent ones.
dishonest scales are inaccurate &/or inconsistent ones.
as long as currency -in any form - is valuated fairly and consistently it is a 'just weight' -- which is why in Torah things were valued 'according to the temple shekel' ((e.g. Exodus 30:13)), this unit or representative 'fiat currency' being established as a regular & congruous exchange rate by the law of Moses in the Bible.
you are wrong to say that just because a currency exchange script is physically made of paper rather than some other earthly substance it is necessarily a dishonest scale; that's just factual error. and i don't see that the scripture agrees with you in any of these points?? to me it looks like you are misusing this verse ((and the other passages which similarly speak of honest measures))
Hahahhaha well......I mean.....this thread should be moved to a new catagory......CC HUMOR thread....or maybe a CC JOKE THREAD......or......I am as dense as lead thread...........
Gold does indeed have intrinsic value, because it is agreed by everyone that it has value and it is rare enough to be valuable
Paper money is devalued. Today it is worth one amount, tomorrow another amount. That is why it breaks the command of the Torah. Understand.
that appears to me to be a very weak & unconvincing argument, and doesn't explain what i see in scripture.
gold and silver is itself 'fiat currency' --- ya can't eat it. it represents the more tangible wealth of cattle and fields and produce, for which it was exchanged in Torah ((e.g. Numbers 18, Leviticus 27)) according to the law.
is it only because of the printing press that it becomes evil to use representative script? metals are fine, but cloth or paper is wicked?
Paper money is devalued. Today it is worth one amount, tomorrow another amount. That is why it breaks the command of the Torah. Understand.
Gold and silver is not "fiat", because gold and silver have value.
you are describing fiat currency.
a tangible unit of exchange not having value in and of itself but agreed upon to represent actual useful wealth, with its valuation being established by rarity arising either by natural finite scarcity or agreed-upon deliberate finitude of production.
that's what gold is. it has valuation for reasons of vanity - to make pretty adornments - and by reason ((primarily)) of agreed-upon representation of tangible wealth like chickens and cows and land.
oh? do they?
do they fill your belly, or keep you warm on a cold night?
you're wrong. you have to exchange coin for food or shelter or blankets.
silver/nickel/brass/gold/tin/platinum etc only have value as currency by fiat and/or mutual agreement as a form of representative, not tangible wealth. same as paper or bitcoin.
No, the value of gold is based on weight. That is why the Torah calls for righteous weights and quantities. I give you an ounce of gold for your laptop. You give me 2 ounces of gold for all my refrigerator. The value of gold is based on weight. Whereas paper money, it is a perceived value, because it is merely paper, and those who issue it give it some value, which they then devalue over time, to their advantage. It is thievery.
That is correct, I do not, I do have even have one penny to my name.
The same is true of gold, silver, iron ore, and every other commodity on earth.Fiat money has perceived value, but not intrinsic value...
Unless you’re posting at a public library or on a friend’s computer, you have commodities, a.k.a. materialistic matter. Guilty as charged.That is correct, I do not, I do have even have one penny to my name.
Paper money does not fill your belly any more than gold does. "Money" has nothing to do with filling your belly, it has to do with a medium that everyone considers valuable. Everyone considers gold to be valuable, which is why it was used for thousands of years as money, and its value was based on weight. Whereas paper money is considered to be valuable by everyone based not on weight, for it is merely paper, but on a perceived value. There is a huge difference. And through that perceived imaginary value, those who issue it deliberately devalue it. This isn't difficult to understand.
This is so silly, this is connected to small agrarian economies and making sure everything is ethical/moral within that system.
Unless you’re posting at a public library or on a friend’s computer, you have commodities, a.k.a. materialistic matter. Guilty as charged.
That is not the definition of intrinsic value. That is the definition of perceived value.Gold does indeed have intrinsic value, because it is agreed by everyone that it has value