You're very severe in your sectarianism, and there are those who are just as severe in the opposite direction. I support neither sect, both of which disobey the Lord with their pride and earthly priorities.
You don't have to look far back in history to see the fruits of this sort of thing, which has happened quite recently in Ireland with Catholics being murdered by extreme Protestants and the IRA murdering Protestants . Anyone who is tempted to use this difference in Christian Faith to become inflamed should therefore turn away from it.
You could quote historic examples of bigotry , cruelty and murder against Catholics by Protestants too, but that is to perpetuate wrongdoing by constantly carping about long past events and trying to re live them. These events were in any case usually driven by kings and dynasties using the badge of Catholicism or Protestantism as excuses for war or power grabs.
You say that the Catholics don't practise true Christianity and perhaps they would say the same of you. My guess is that you've both got some of it wrong but I know that only God has the answers and that our best hope of learning is through prayer and love of our neighbours.
The word tolerance is bandied about a lot these days, usually by intolerant people, but I think this is a case where true tolerance is called for, together with some humility.
Spoken like a true Catholic who has absolutely no idea how badly they have been mislead by their dishonest overlords.
No one stuck in a false doctrine can ever come out and admit they might be in a trap until they somehow break free of that trap.
Pope claiming a throne that belongs only to Jesus: Wrong.
Purgatory: Wrong.
Mary, sinless, mediator between sinner and Jesus: Wrong.
Peter was the first "Pope." Wrong.
Indulgences. Wrong.
A severely-flawed view of the Gospel led the Catholic church to murder and persecute 1000's of people for 100's of years
Obama and European leaders made an agreement with Iran. Trump scuppered it. Question is was that really because Iran was secretly
producing more fuel or because it was Obama who set up the agreement ?. Remember Iraq and Saddams weapons of mass destruction
which no one's found to this day. The UK got into that mess which left Iraq devastated and the population on its knees. No doubt there were plenty of people at the time relishing the defeat of Saddam.
Obama's plan was to pay Iran not to develop a nuclear weapon. That's like saying you will pay a mugger not to rob you. The ultimate in stupidity. I guess you think it's best to just cave in the face of an odious bully.
It is hilarious that you continually paint the UK as this manipulated puppet that has no free choice of it's own to make. That must make it a pretty weak and useless world power. Of course they have not been a major world power since World War II, so I guess your point is well-taken.
I said it back when Bush v2.0 went into Iraq and I say it again now with history to back me up. Removing Saddam was a horrible mistake. The second Gulf War left the country destabilized so that any faction could come in when we left to fill the vacuum. What you don't know about world policy is a lot.