when he spoke of the resurrection (a few chapters before 29)of the dead,he did not mention 1 thes 4.
In chapter 25,26 he is speaking of (2) Thess. 2
when he spoke of the resurrection (a few chapters before 29)of the dead,he did not mention 1 thes 4.
I wonder if anywhere he speaks on the imminent return
That trips me up when reading the ECF writings.I wonder if anywhere he speaks on the imminent return
He was. He passed away unfortunately.The real question is: Is that your dog in the avatar? Adorable! I like the hat. What breed is it?
Have you ever read any of the early Church letters(Justin Martyr,epistle of Barnabas,Against Heresies ect ? Why I ask is they spoke of the seven Millennial days(some more in depth than others). This is why I say it is similar to the dispensational approach of the modern day but also a little different. Look at AH book 5,chapter 28 and 29(is speaking of the six millennials and the seventh) from an ad170 point of view. John the Apostle set Polycarp over Smyrna(from Revelation) and Irenaeus grew up listening to Polycarp saying what he heard from John, http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/irenaeus-book5.html
So what? If it's not in the bible it dosn't count! It's an opinion by someone a long time ago someone that's not in the word of God. Non biblical writings have no validity beyond that of opinions. Calvin, Luther, Westly and some Popes may have good men but they are not in the inspired word of God. They are no more to be honored than Menon, Martin Luther King, Billy Graham or Reverend Little Richard. Nothing they said has any authority vs. the Bible. The Bible is the measuring rod in every circumstance.
Well that is quite unfortunate, since your *strong conviction* is more prejudice than anything else. You have yet to show FROM SCRIPTURE that you have anything of substance in this matter.My strong conviction is that premillennial dispensationalism is the worst end times view, other than full preterism.
Why don't you PERSONALLY present your case from the Bible itself? So far you have been misinterpreting and misapplying Scripture.If you listen to these sermon series, realize that you need to start from the bottom (the oldest ones) and go upward.
The misunderstandings of those who committed atrocities is not a legitimate apologetic for your system. I could just as easy discount all of Christianity due to the activities of various Christians throughout time.
I don't believe that the occupation of Palestine by Jews is significant in terms of prophecy, and that it is only through the lenses of dispensationalism that it becomes significant.
Where does the Bible say that just before the return of Jesus Jewish sinners will embrace the Gospel message of Jesus on mass and be saved from the judgement to come???
I would go back to where you stopped reading (ch.16 post 456) and read to the end. I think your thinking "imminent return" in a 21'st century frame of mind. If you read from ch.16 to the end Irenaeus describes the 10 horns as future(to him in 170ad),Rome as present tense,,the MoS as future tense,,,
So which is why I said that he was post trib.(thinks the Church will go through it),,,pre wrath(caught up before Gods wrath begins),,pre millennial( Mo S,trib, and then wrath come prior to Mill.). So your looking for him speaking of "immanent return" and not seeing what he is saying.
Does not replacement theology declare that God is finished with the Jews and that God is now working with gentiles and not with the Jews...
How can the church include Jews and Gentiles in the replacement theology stance when that stance says that God is now only dealing with the gentiles ???
^ the Luke 12 passage I referred to there ^, for example, starts with: "Let your waist be girded about, and the lamps burning." [see also Matt25:1-13]… Both "Second Coming to the earth" passages (not our Rapture)
[i.e. both of them ^ "fitting" in the "IN THE NIGHT" context of "the Day of the Lord [TIME PERIOD ("DARK"/"DARKNESS" portion)]" (7 yr tribulation period--THAT portion; its ARRIVAL and duration)]
The misunderstandings of those who committed atrocities is not a legitimate apologetic for your system. I could just as easy discount all of Christianity due to the activities of various Christians throughout time.
I don't believe that the occupation of Palestine by Jews is significant in terms of prophecy, and that it is only through the lenses of dispensationalism that it becomes significant.
Well that is quite unfortunate, since your *strong conviction* is more prejudice than anything else. You have yet to show FROM SCRIPTURE that you have anything of substance in this matter.
At the end of the day people are gonna believe what they wanna believe, BUT, my question is, HOW does dispensationalism effect the Church in PRACTICAL terms? What actual harm does it do?Look at the many Scriptures in the Gospels and epistles that indicate Jesus will return, and a general resurrection will occur at that time, and death will be defeated PERMANENTLY.
Start with Matthew 25 and I Corinthians 15.
I know you guys try to squeeze a thousand years in between the return of Jesus and the defeat of death....good luck with that.
The problem is that you take one chapter in the Bible (Rev 20), and read your theology into it. I would suggest studying GK Beale's commentary on Revelation in this regard.
TRUE. But neither did they teach covenant theology, all of these are MANMADE systems that came RECENTLY. No such thing as "systematic theology" in the Bible.Jesus and the apostles did not teach dispensationalism in the sense that you guys believe it.