like here. I have told you multiple times about Leviticus 26, how God the Father speaks of the Covenant made with the fathers of those who came out of Egypt.
the Covenant ( singular ) contained the 10 Commands , and the festivals, and the ceremonial laws, and the rest.
one Law. one Covenant . so, unless you can trace your ancestry back to those who crossed the red sea, then that Covenant was not made with you.
and, I just gave you ( again ) the definition of the greek word for Law, ( singular).
so, when you ignore these facts, and keep on saying otherwise, that makes you willfully blind.
I do understand the difference between plural and singular, but why it matters, in what context it matters, how the changing from singular to plural matters, I would need an explanation with comparisons and examples because I do not know what you are trying to point out as being so significant. So please do, if you would???
But here on my thoughts,
If not natural, are you not grafted in? Once grafted in do you not partake of the same root for life. God is not a respector of persons, correct? Jesus did away with the divisions, didn't he? And just because there were few rules to the "Newly Converted" 2000 yrs ago, haven't all of us today been raised in the same "Word of God"? Or do you think there is a separate bible for gentiles? And just because you can't trace your genealogy doesn't mean you AREN'T any more than it means you ARE of the natural seed. So the law of Moses was (singular). That (singular) LAW was created as "temporary", only in effect "as the law" till John the Baptist. Singular or plural, it is no longer (and never has been) the "law" for us, no matter whos bloodline we came from.
Why? BECAUSE JESUS CAME AND PIECED IT ALL OUT not caring a wit, whether it was singular or plural. removing what was contrary to us, removing the curse by hanging on the cross, becoming the "sacrificial lamb" therefore removing all the ceremonies that went with animal sacrifice, replacing death WITHOUT mercy WITH repentance and forgiveness for life, replacing earthly priests with HIMSELF there went those "parts", the commandments, Gods Divine laws that will never change, be we in the flesh, corruptible body or the spirit incorruptible body, the laws that will never change from one age to the next (yet, no need to write the laws that have to do with "temporary flesh man" is there?) laws like ONLY ONE GOD, NO IDOLATRY, don't make images, don't swear, lie, steal, kill, covet, you know, the 'BE HOLY' ones. Throughout His walk on this planet, there were old ones carried forward and new ones added to, some changes, and leaving all the rest behind, This is the law we are to follow. WHY? Because it is our duty to OBEY IT, NOT TO TRY TO BE JUSTIFIED BY IT, but to keep us on the right path, the path that leads to God, not deception. The law is holy and good. NOT FOR SALVATION, JUST LIKE NOT FOR JUSTIFICATION because the law can't forgive us, the law can't give us life because WE ALL SIN.
Paul confirmed the law by following it himself though, didn't he? The righteous man lives by faith. How are we to know righteousness? Isn't that why the law came in in the first place? To tell the good ways of God from the ways of the world? Can you know God without knowing His laws? NO. you can not. Can you teach God without teaching His laws? NO, you can not.
Can you be
Matthew 5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
So should we be teaching the commandments? Yes. Should we be breaking the commandments? NO. Does the law or following the law justify us? No, Are we saved by the law? No. Do we uphold and follow and teach the law? Yes. What law? The law of the kingdom of God. Do we follow the law of Moses? NO, its time for being our law has passed. Do we teach the law of Moses? YES, its value to us has not passed our bondage to it has, be it singular or plural.