...We know that we all possess knowledge. Knowledge puffs up, but love builds up. The man who thinks he knows something does not yet know as he ought to know. But the man who loves God is known by God. 1 Corinthians 8:1-3
...We know that we all possess knowledge. Knowledge puffs up, but love builds up. The man who thinks he knows something does not yet know as he ought to know. But the man who loves God is known by God. 1 Corinthians 8:1-3
I think God knew they "could" keep them;
Deu 30:10-11 NIV if you obey the LORD your God and keep his commands and decrees that are written in this Book of the Law and turn to the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul. (11) Now what I am commanding you today is not too difficult for you or beyond your reach.
Hey NayborBear,
It is very obvious that the one thing that "obedience", "repentance", "works", etc have in common is what a mans heart, when yielded to the Holy Spirit, does, and that is go into action! These are the exact words that many scoff at though.
Why do you think they scoff so much at our personal desire and enthusiasm to do these things out of Love for our Creator?
SG
I like this definition of Love hereGreetings W!,
As usual simple direct guidance from the scriptures. Wherever "Love" is used, I like to substitute Yahshua's definition;
Joh 14:21 KJV He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.
So the verse you quoted above could read:
1Co 8:1-3 NIV Now about food sacrificed to idols: We know that we all possess knowledge. Knowledge puffs up, but Knowing and Keeping Gods Commands builds up. (2) The man who thinks he knows something does not yet know as he ought to know. (3) But the man who Knows and Keeps Gods commands is known by God.
Flows very well! Even the last three words "is known by God" matches the sentiment of John 14:21!
"Knowing" Gods Commandments without "keeping" them is "pride/puffing up" while "knowing and Keeping" or obedience is a sign of "humility"
Sometimes, I find a link between pride and resistance to authority, maybe every time! And definitely a link between Obedience and Humility! Yahshua demonstrated Humility and Obedience perfectly.
We should all know this link and reflect on whether our doctrines match this dual relationship of Humility and obedience.
SG Know and Keep!
I just call what I see
If You are offended about what I believe thats sad..
But to say it is calling you names.. While you do this almost every post.. once again just shows your true nature..
Oh wow Nayborbear. This line hit me like a spiritual wrecking ball.
How in the world would it provoke Israel to jealousy completely rejecting everything that was entrusted to Israel first, tossing it away and then doing a completely separate thing?
Have more blessings come gentiles' way as compared to natural Israel because of this? Does natural Israel even care about what gentile believers are currently doing? What makes natural Israel jealous?
Paul explains in Romans 11 that it's to spur them to emulation so as to save them.
No, what would provoke them to jealous is gentiles being a better Israel than natural Israel was.
Good word, Nayborbear.
For by one sacrifice he HAS PERFECTED FOREVER those who are BEING SANCTIFIED.
Whose work is it? Yours or Gods?
I would be ashamed of trying to take credit for the work of God..
Yes in sanctification, we must paetake. But it is STILL gods work. And he also said that work he start in you, HE WILL COMPLETE IT.
When will you start to trust God and stop trusting yourself? (Honest question)
One day they will return to the Good Shepherd. In the meantime, He still cares for his sheep.And the Lord said to Moses: “You are going to rest with your ancestors, and these people will soon prostitute themselves to the foreign gods of the land they are entering. They will forsake Me and break the covenant I made with them. And in that day I will become angry with them and forsake them; I will hide My face from them, and they will be destroyed. Many disasters and calamities will come on them, and in that day they will ask, ‘Have not these disasters come on us because our God is not with us?’ And I will certainly hide My face in that day because of all their wickedness in turning to other gods.Now write down this song and teach it to the Israelites and have them sing it, so that it may be a witness for Me against them."(Deuteronomy 31:16-19)
Go thou and do likewise, even on the Sabbath.I like this definition of Love here
Luke 10: 29. But he, desiring to justify himself, asked Jesus, "Who is my neighbor?" 30. Jesus answered, "A certain man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and he fell among robbers, who both stripped him and beat him, and departed, leaving him half dead.
36. Now which of these three do you think seemed to be a neighbor to him who fell among the robbers?" 37. He said, "He who showed mercy on him." Then Jesus said to him, "Go and do likewise."
I like this definition of Love here
Luke 10: 29. But he, desiring to justify himself, asked Jesus, "Who is my neighbor?" 30. Jesus answered, "A certain man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and he fell among robbers, who both stripped him and beat him, and departed, leaving him half dead.
36. Now which of these three do you think seemed to be a neighbor to him who fell among the robbers?" 37. He said, "He who showed mercy on him." Then Jesus said to him, "Go and do likewise."
Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God. (Heb 12:2 KJV)I thought of this last evening and wanted to share here.
Why would we set to arguing about God's law of love? Why would any of us be adamantly opposed to someone else honoring the Sabbath day when they feel led to? It's their faith and their relationship with the Father. A personal individual connection to the Lord.
Why would anyone argue that basic human decency as outlined and as a matter of having a foundation in love for our self and love for our neighbor as we love our self, be at issue for anyone who is in Christ? When that individual believes the ten commands of God are eternal. Because they are not only grounded in Love for God, ourselves, and our neighbor whom the edicts insure reflect love for that neighbor as we love ourselves who would not trespass against them. These being the two great commands Jesus said the law and the prophets hang upon.
Jesus , when asked what parts of the law apply, didn't say , they don't. Because I am arrived! Jesus reiterated the law in his ministry, the ten commands, and in answering that question informed those attending that love of God and self are what those laws reflect. Love of God. Love of our self and for our neighbor whom we are to love and respect as we love and respect our self.
Why then would there ever be a conflict among the people of God's holy church in these matters? How could we ever dare say the laws of, thou shalt and shalt not, don't apply now?
When those ten commands are reflective of not just love of God, but basic human decency.
And we would dare say, no, that isn't applicable anymore because Jesus delivered the new covenant that exists without that.
I've come to believe the strongest opponents to those ten laws of decency and respect for God are not in the church of our Lord. They're in the congregation of the anti-christ. They know they'll not persuade those anointed of Christ to turn from God but they'll escalate a pointless discussion to that end just to interject tare after tare after tare, so as to gain attention from those who are in Christ. As we erroneously imagine we'll ever be able to set them on the straight and narrow.
This discussion if you read back just 10 pages is going nowhere. It is circling and circling and circling in the same downward direction and repeating the same point and counterpoint only in different phrases. All meaning to present the same message.
God's moral guidance doesn't apply - That's the anti-christ path
You're wrong! - That's the righteous path.
When Jesus did not say the law was abolished but that he had fulfilled it, it meant he fulfilled the laws of Moses so as to make them null and void. Jesus ministry went on to reiterate, re-state, the ten laws of our Father as still in effect when he was asked what laws matter still.
Do we argue now our Savior was wrong? And those against that teaching are right?
Maybe those in the faith and eternal irrevocable embrace of our precious Father might consider that rather than having a discussion here we're actually being approached by the messages and messengers of the enemy of our Father.
2 Corinthians 11:12-15
And I will continue doing what I am doing now, because I want to stop those people from having a reason to brag. They would like to say that the work they brag about is the same as ours. Such men are not true apostles but are workers who lie. They change themselves to look like apostles of Christ. This does not surprise us. Even Satan changes himself to look like an angel of light. So it does not surprise us if Satan’s servants also make themselves look like servants who work for what is right. But in the end they will be punished for what they do.
That's all I wanted to say.
What are those actions?
Greetings PH,And the Lord said to Moses: “You are going to rest with your ancestors, and these people will soon prostitute themselves to the foreign gods of the land they are entering. They will forsake Me and break the covenant I made with them. And in that day I will become angry with them and forsake them; I will hide My face from them, and they will be destroyed. Many disasters and calamities will come on them, and in that day they will ask, ‘Have not these disasters come on us because our God is not with us?’ And I will certainly hide My face in that day because of all their wickedness in turning to other gods.Now write down this song and teach it to the Israelites and have them sing it, so that it may be a witness for Me against them."(Deuteronomy 31:16-19)
I thought of this last evening and wanted to share here.
Why would we set to arguing about God's law of love? Why would any of us be adamantly opposed to someone else honoring the Sabbath day when they feel led to? It's their faith and their relationship with the Father. A personal individual connection to the Lord.
Why would anyone argue that basic human decency as outlined and as a matter of having a foundation in love for our self and love for our neighbor as we love our self, be at issue for anyone who is in Christ? When that individual believes the ten commands of God are eternal. Because they are not only grounded in Love for God, ourselves, and our neighbor whom the edicts insure reflect love for that neighbor as we love ourselves who would not trespass against them. These being the two great commands Jesus said the law and the prophets hang upon.
Jesus , when asked what parts of the law apply, didn't say , they don't. Because I am arrived! Jesus reiterated the law in his ministry, the ten commands, and in answering that question informed those attending that love of God and self are what those laws reflect. Love of God. Love of our self and for our neighbor whom we are to love and respect as we love and respect our self.
Why then would there ever be a conflict among the people of God's holy church in these matters? How could we ever dare say the laws of, thou shalt and shalt not, don't apply now?
When those ten commands are reflective of not just love of God, but basic human decency.
And we would dare say, no, that isn't applicable anymore because Jesus delivered the new covenant that exists without that.
I've come to believe the strongest opponents to those ten laws of decency and respect for God are not in the church of our Lord. They're in the congregation of the anti-christ. They know they'll not persuade those anointed of Christ to turn from God but they'll escalate a pointless discussion to that end just to interject tare after tare after tare, so as to gain attention from those who are in Christ. As we erroneously imagine we'll ever be able to set them on the straight and narrow.
This discussion if you read back just 10 pages is going nowhere. It is circling and circling and circling in the same downward direction and repeating the same point and counterpoint only in different phrases. All meaning to present the same message.
God's moral guidance doesn't apply - That's the anti-christ path
You're wrong! - That's the righteous path.
When Jesus did not say the law was abolished but that he had fulfilled it, it meant he fulfilled the laws of Moses so as to make them null and void. Jesus ministry went on to reiterate, re-state, the ten laws of our Father as still in effect when he was asked what laws matter still.
Do we argue now our Savior was wrong? And those against that teaching are right?
Maybe those in the faith and eternal irrevocable embrace of our precious Father might consider that rather than having a discussion here we're actually being approached by the messages and messengers of the enemy of our Father.
2 Corinthians 11:12-15
And I will continue doing what I am doing now, because I want to stop those people from having a reason to brag. They would like to say that the work they brag about is the same as ours. Such men are not true apostles but are workers who lie. They change themselves to look like apostles of Christ. This does not surprise us. Even Satan changes himself to look like an angel of light. So it does not surprise us if Satan’s servants also make themselves look like servants who work for what is right. But in the end they will be punished for what they do.
That's all I wanted to say.
“Everyone that has been born from God does not go on doing sinning because his seed remains in him; and he is not able to go on sinning because he has been born of God”Y'all cannot keep preaching "Eternal Salvation", in that OSAS doctrine! Because, it just ISN'T TRUE!
(gotta go....back later)
Thank youI thought of this last evening and wanted to share here.
Why would we set to arguing about God's law of love? Why would any of us be adamantly opposed to someone else honoring the Sabbath day when they feel led to? It's their faith and their relationship with the Father. A personal individual connection to the Lord.
Why would anyone argue that basic human decency as outlined and as a matter of having a foundation in love for our self and love for our neighbor as we love our self, be at issue for anyone who is in Christ? When that individual believes the ten commands of God are eternal. Because they are not only grounded in Love for God, ourselves, and our neighbor whom the edicts insure reflect love for that neighbor as we love ourselves who would not trespass against them. These being the two great commands Jesus said the law and the prophets hang upon.
Jesus , when asked what parts of the law apply, didn't say , they don't. Because I am arrived! Jesus reiterated the law in his ministry, the ten commands, and in answering that question informed those attending that love of God and self are what those laws reflect. Love of God. Love of our self and for our neighbor whom we are to love and respect as we love and respect our self.
Why then would there ever be a conflict among the people of God's holy church in these matters? How could we ever dare say the laws of, thou shalt and shalt not, don't apply now?
When those ten commands are reflective of not just love of God, but basic human decency.
And we would dare say, no, that isn't applicable anymore because Jesus delivered the new covenant that exists without that.
I've come to believe the strongest opponents to those ten laws of decency and respect for God are not in the church of our Lord. They're in the congregation of the anti-christ. They know they'll not persuade those anointed of Christ to turn from God but they'll escalate a pointless discussion to that end just to interject tare after tare after tare, so as to gain attention from those who are in Christ. As we erroneously imagine we'll ever be able to set them on the straight and narrow.
This discussion if you read back just 10 pages is going nowhere. It is circling and circling and circling in the same downward direction and repeating the same point and counterpoint only in different phrases. All meaning to present the same message.
God's moral guidance doesn't apply - That's the anti-christ path
You're wrong! - That's the righteous path.
When Jesus did not say the law was abolished but that he had fulfilled it, it meant he fulfilled the laws of Moses so as to make them null and void. Jesus ministry went on to reiterate, re-state, the ten laws of our Father as still in effect when he was asked what laws matter still.
Do we argue now our Savior was wrong? And those against that teaching are right?
Maybe those in the faith and eternal irrevocable embrace of our precious Father might consider that rather than having a discussion here we're actually being approached by the messages and messengers of the enemy of our Father.
2 Corinthians 11:12-15
And I will continue doing what I am doing now, because I want to stop those people from having a reason to brag. They would like to say that the work they brag about is the same as ours. Such men are not true apostles but are workers who lie. They change themselves to look like apostles of Christ. This does not surprise us. Even Satan changes himself to look like an angel of light. So it does not surprise us if Satan’s servants also make themselves look like servants who work for what is right. But in the end they will be punished for what they do.
That's all I wanted to say.
WELL SAID NayborBear!Well? Another reason, is they have been seduced into "a blind love", by the "adversary!" So, in this "blindness?"
They "see" themselves as "saved eternally!" As "reigning" with Christ for those thousand years!
This is they "why" I have said so often, they "have clocks!" "Yet, still can't tell what time it is!"
They have been "seduced/oppressed" into thinking, that there are no "days of Noah", as Christ pointed out to His Disciples, in regards to His returning! That these "days of Noah", are for some future time!
But, what is Paul speaking of here:
Ephesians 6
12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
As can be seen, even in Paul's teaching? This is NOT "flesh warfare!" It's SPIRITUAL!
Looky HERE to what John states!
1 John 4
3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and EVEN NOW ALREADY is it in the world.
What these verses should be telling one? We have NEVER NOT been in "the DAYS of Noah!" NEVER!!
Jesus knew/knows this! John knew/knows this!
The elect, knew/knows this!
OSAS? They don't know this!
And, it is for this reason they mock and scoff!
Because "their daddy", doesn't want these "dots" to EVER be connected!
This is "why" they see the words we post, and try to teach, as "works FOR salvation!" Judizers! Legalists! Hebrew Roots!
Because they "see" in their seduction, these as "Works OF the Flesh!" But, they're NOT!
These are "Spiritual EFFORTS & Warfare" coming THROUGH "these flesh bodies!"
Matthew 24
22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.
24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, IF IT WERE POSSIBLE(?), they shall deceive the very elect.
What we are seeing time and time again, and what "the elect" are proving time and again, throughout this thread, as well as other threads?
Is the futility, although, the "elect" are greatly outnumbered, the inability of "being, and becoming deceived!"
Swayed? To a "certain point?" Yes! Outnumbered? Yes! Oppressed? Yes! Persecuted? Yes! "Leveraged?" To a "certain point?" Yes!
Deceived? Not gonna happen!
Our Father WON'T ALLOW it to happen!