John was inspired by God....you, your view and any man's testimony....not so much.....There are way too many testimonies and conversions of people who experienced that very thing.
It's like you telling John that his vision on patmose was all in his mind.
A mans testimony is his Jordan.
The man converted has a story to tell.
You can poo poo all the ones outside your doctrine. Means nothing to a man that "been there ,done that"
"Ha,ha,ha,you really want me to believe a donkey will ever speak sentences to a human? That will never happen. Keep Fantacizing in your mind"
Pssst.....it already did once.
Amen! Mark 16:16 - He who believes and is baptized will be saved (general cases without making a qualification for the unusual case of someone who believes but is not baptized) but he who does not believe will be condemned. The omission of baptized with "does not believe" shows that Jesus does not make baptism absolutely essential to salvation. Condemnation rests on unbelief, not on a lack of baptism. So salvation rests on belief. *NOWHERE does the Bible say "baptized or condemned."
If water baptism is absolutely required for salvation, then why did Jesus not mention it in the following verses? (3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:29,40,47; 11:25,26). What is the ONE requirement that Jesus mentions 9 different times in each of these complete statements? *BELIEVES. *What happened to baptism? *Hermeneutics.
John 3:18 - He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who (is not water baptized? - NO) does not believe is condemned already, because he has not (been water baptized? - NO) because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
dc, define the "last part of Mark" that was added.....
You just proved what I blogged -Pentecost is not the gospel. The long ending of Mark is not a stand alone representation of the words of Christ.
I added no interpretation I merely quoted scripture alone Mark 16:15-20I just dislike your misinterpretation of the very words spoken by Jesus.
You asked.. I was just responding.We had this discussion before EG.
Not at all. I just dislike your misinterpretation of the very words spoken by Jesus.[/QUOTE]@mailmandan dislikes the very words spoken by Jesus.
You did not provide proof. You provided your interpretation of a few passages in acts.I don't see in scripture where baptism with the Holy Spirit happens under two separate occasions. I see where ALL believers are baptized by one Spirit into one body (1 Corinthians 12:13) and certain believers are "filled" with the Holy Spirit to accomplish specific tasks, as we saw at Pentecost when they began to speak in other tongues and those listening heard them speak in their own language.
as I stated earlier, I did provide scriptural proof from the book of Acts, that salvation is not being baptized in the Holy Spirit
that post was answered in a way that indicates no comprehension in what I wrote as well as a defense saying they did not say this and they did not say that, even though I never said they did. so no point in wading through that again; however this teaching that there is but one baptism, when the Bible has several, water included, is dangerous
this is a false teaching that is going the rounds here and it is not biblical
when someone begins a statement with 'I don't see', and then goes on to defend a defenseless interpretation with a mashup of scripture from the NT that has nothing to do with being baptized in fulfillment of the prophecy of John the Baptist, I can only agree with them that they are correct in stating 'they do not see'
I don't believe we need to go over and over and over with the same people to illustrate that we are sealed upon conversion...you are saved...but that the baptism in the Holy Spirit is not that occasion. The Bible speaks for itself on this
people go on to say that they have gifts from the list in scripture but no tongues or prophecy
teaching is acceptable, discernment and helps and others is all fine
but mention anything that is supernatural and takes faith to practice and a hew and cry will go up and torches will be lit and the heretic will be attacked
it's ridiculous and the very nature of the vitriol indicates something akin to hatred of these gifts IMO
which is why I say the attacks seem to have taken on a life of their own
I don't see in scripture where baptism with the Holy Spirit happens under two separate occasions. I see where ALL believers are baptized by one Spirit into one body (1 Corinthians 12:13) and certain believers are "filled" with the Holy Spirit to accomplish specific tasks, as we saw at Pentecost when they began to speak in other tongues and those listening heard them speak in their own language.
as I stated earlier, I did provide scriptural proof from the book of Acts, that salvation is not being baptized in the Holy Spirit
that post was answered in a way that indicates no comprehension in what I wrote as well as a defense saying they did not say this and they did not say that, even though I never said they did. so no point in wading through that again; however this teaching that there is but one baptism, when the Bible has several, water included, is dangerous
this is a false teaching that is going the rounds here and it is not biblical
when someone begins a statement with 'I don't see', and then goes on to defend a defenseless interpretation with a mashup of scripture from the NT that has nothing to do with being baptized in fulfillment of the prophecy of John the Baptist, I can only agree with them that they are correct in stating 'they do not see'
I don't believe we need to go over and over and over with the same people to illustrate that we are sealed upon conversion...you are saved...but that the baptism in the Holy Spirit is not that occasion. The Bible speaks for itself on this
people go on to say that they have gifts from the list in scripture but no tongues or prophecy
teaching is acceptable, discernment and helps and others is all fine
but mention anything that is supernatural and takes faith to practice and a hew and cry will go up and torches will be lit and the heretic will be attacked
it's ridiculous and the very nature of the vitriol indicates something akin to hatred of these gifts IMO
which is why I say the attacks seem to have taken on a life of their own
You just proved what I blogged -
you are an unbeliever of the word of God and your problem is with scripture.
Col 3:3Yes, But something had to happen to you.
Like being IMMERSED into the blood?
Do you know what the term is that means to be immersed? And who does it?
You asked.. I was just responding.
These guys that stand on the last part of Mark and deny the fact that there is strong internal and external evidence that it has been added........and yet they will ride their view right over the cliff like the Bison being driven off the cliffs in the 1800's without giving the evidence a serious, honest evaluation.....
I don’t think so. I learned about this from a Rabbi. Believing Rabbi.
I added no interpretation I merely quoted scripture alone Mark 16:15-20
the problem of unbelief is yours and yours alone
I agree that all are immersed by the same Spirit of God into one body, however Paul told the church at Ephesus to be continually filled with the Spirit and uses about 4 to 5 clauses to show the evidence of being continually filled....in other words I do not buy the "certain believers are filled" idea......we are all filled by the Spirit and the SPIRIT meets out particular tasks as needed and willed by God.
I agree that all are immersed by the same Spirit of God into one body, however Paul told the church at Ephesus to be continually filled with the Spirit and uses about 4 to 5 clauses to show the evidence of being continually filled....in other words I do not buy the "certain believers are filled" idea......we are all filled by the Spirit and the SPIRIT meets out particular tasks as needed and willed by God.