is bible the word of God
- Thread starter mjkhan
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I have read the Koran. Compared to the Bible there are several issues.
1. All cities in the Bible have been found to be exactly like the Bible states with archaeological digs. . The one and only city in the Koran fails excavation.
2. The Bible never condricts itself. The Koran which supposedly was in heaven and spoken to Muhammad by Gabriel. The concept of abrogation is part of the Koran. A later spoken verse replaces an earlier one.
3. The Koran says Jesus was just a good man and never said he was anything more. The Bible has Jesus saying "I and the Father are one."
1. All cities in the Bible have been found to be exactly like the Bible states with archaeological digs. . The one and only city in the Koran fails excavation.
2. The Bible never condricts itself. The Koran which supposedly was in heaven and spoken to Muhammad by Gabriel. The concept of abrogation is part of the Koran. A later spoken verse replaces an earlier one.
3. The Koran says Jesus was just a good man and never said he was anything more. The Bible has Jesus saying "I and the Father are one."
I have read the Koran. Compared to the Bible there are several issues.
1. All cities in the Bible have been found to be exactly like the Bible states with archaeological digs. . The one and only city in the Koran fails excavation.
2. The Bible never condricts itself. The Koran which supposedly was in heaven and spoken to Muhammad by Gabriel. The concept of abrogation is part of the Koran. A later spoken verse replaces an earlier one.
3. The Koran says Jesus was just a good man and never said he was anything more. The Bible has Jesus saying "I and the Father are one."
1. All cities in the Bible have been found to be exactly like the Bible states with archaeological digs. . The one and only city in the Koran fails excavation.
2. The Bible never condricts itself. The Koran which supposedly was in heaven and spoken to Muhammad by Gabriel. The concept of abrogation is part of the Koran. A later spoken verse replaces an earlier one.
3. The Koran says Jesus was just a good man and never said he was anything more. The Bible has Jesus saying "I and the Father are one."
1)Quran has more info on archaeological digs e.g about Pharaoh who was identified as the one who chased Moses until drowning has been mentioned in Quran clearly.And many others also.
2)No book contradicts itself like Bible.Revised n new revised editions and also so much contradictions with each other.Then there r scientific contradictions as well.
3) Quran is the only non gospel book which praises n glorifies Jesus.Jesus saying I n father r one is not like saying" I m God or worship me,"Understand difference between proof n explanation.
2)No book contradicts itself like Bible.Revised n new revised editions and also so much contradictions with each other.Then there r scientific contradictions as well.
3) Quran is the only non gospel book which praises n glorifies Jesus.Jesus saying I n father r one is not like saying" I m God or worship me,"Understand difference between proof n explanation.
Okay, so you are Muslim, but don't you both teach and believe Jesus was just a prophet like Mohammed, and just a man of God?
Whatever your definition of a prophet is.
My wife's relatives on both sides, mother's and father's sides, were Muslim, and she said the same thing as you, only, from what I can tell, they kind of mixed the Muslim ways with the Catholic. But she did say they were nothing like what we have seen on tv concerning, what is commonly called, radical Islam.
Both my wife's mother and father's last names were Mohammed, which was my wife's maiden name before I married her.
Whatever your definition of a prophet is.
My wife's relatives on both sides, mother's and father's sides, were Muslim, and she said the same thing as you, only, from what I can tell, they kind of mixed the Muslim ways with the Catholic. But she did say they were nothing like what we have seen on tv concerning, what is commonly called, radical Islam.
Both my wife's mother and father's last names were Mohammed, which was my wife's maiden name before I married her.
All are translations of the original texts. One problem is language changes over the years. The KJV suffers from this. Here are the problems with the KJV because of 1611 to today.
Problems with the KJV
Because of the changes in the English language between 1611 to today, a number of words occur in the King James that make zero sense to most people today. These include the following nuggets that you will find scattered here and there:
Almug
Algum
Charashim
Chode
Cracknels
Gat
Habergeon
Hosen
Kab
Ligure
Neesed
Nusings
Ouches
ring-straked
sycamyne
trow
wimples, ….
In addition knowledge of nature has advanced greatly since 1611. The King James translators translated some animal names into animals that in fact we now have pretty good reason for knowing don’t actually exist:
unicorn (Deut. 33:17)
satyr (Isa 13:21);
dragon (Deut 32:33) (for serpent)
cockatrice (Isa 11:8),
arrowsnake (Gen 49:11, in the margin).
Moreover,, there are phrases that simply don’t make sense any more to modern readers: Phrases that no longer make sense:
ouches of gold (Exod. 28:11);
collops of fat (Job 15:25);
naughty figs (Jer 24:2);
ien with (Jer. 3:2);
the ground is chapt (Jer 14:4);
brazen wall” (Jer 15:20);
rentest thy face (Jer. 4:30);
urrain of the cattle (Exod. 9:2);
And there are whole sentences that are confusing at best, virtually indecipherable (or humorous)
And Jacob sod pottage (Gen 25:29)
And Mt. Sinai was altogether on a smoke (Exoc. 19:18)
Thou shalt destroy them that speak leasing (Ps. 5:6)
I trow not (Luke 17:9)
We do you to wit of the grace of God (2 Cor. 8:1)
Ye are not straitened in us, but ye are straitened in your own bowels (2 Cor. 6:12)
He who letteth will let (2 Thes 2:7)
The words of the wise are as goads, and as nails fastened by the masters of assemblies, which are given from one shepherd (Eccles. 12:11)
Other sentences make sense, but would today be considered somewhat problematic – at least for the sacred Scripture. My favorite is the one that refers one who: “Pisseth against the wall:…. 1 Sam 25:22, 34, I Kings 14:10!
NIV uses the word man.
Problems with the KJV
Because of the changes in the English language between 1611 to today, a number of words occur in the King James that make zero sense to most people today. These include the following nuggets that you will find scattered here and there:
Almug
Algum
Charashim
Chode
Cracknels
Gat
Habergeon
Hosen
Kab
Ligure
Neesed
Nusings
Ouches
ring-straked
sycamyne
trow
wimples, ….
In addition knowledge of nature has advanced greatly since 1611. The King James translators translated some animal names into animals that in fact we now have pretty good reason for knowing don’t actually exist:
unicorn (Deut. 33:17)
satyr (Isa 13:21);
dragon (Deut 32:33) (for serpent)
cockatrice (Isa 11:8),
arrowsnake (Gen 49:11, in the margin).
Moreover,, there are phrases that simply don’t make sense any more to modern readers: Phrases that no longer make sense:
ouches of gold (Exod. 28:11);
collops of fat (Job 15:25);
naughty figs (Jer 24:2);
ien with (Jer. 3:2);
the ground is chapt (Jer 14:4);
brazen wall” (Jer 15:20);
rentest thy face (Jer. 4:30);
urrain of the cattle (Exod. 9:2);
And there are whole sentences that are confusing at best, virtually indecipherable (or humorous)
And Jacob sod pottage (Gen 25:29)
And Mt. Sinai was altogether on a smoke (Exoc. 19:18)
Thou shalt destroy them that speak leasing (Ps. 5:6)
I trow not (Luke 17:9)
We do you to wit of the grace of God (2 Cor. 8:1)
Ye are not straitened in us, but ye are straitened in your own bowels (2 Cor. 6:12)
He who letteth will let (2 Thes 2:7)
The words of the wise are as goads, and as nails fastened by the masters of assemblies, which are given from one shepherd (Eccles. 12:11)
Other sentences make sense, but would today be considered somewhat problematic – at least for the sacred Scripture. My favorite is the one that refers one who: “Pisseth against the wall:…. 1 Sam 25:22, 34, I Kings 14:10!
NIV uses the word man.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Yes, Jesus did say He was the Son of God, many times over.
And not just THE SON, but one of the trinity.
Joh 14:8 Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us.
Joh 14:9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?
That's just one.
And not just THE SON, but one of the trinity.
Joh 14:8 Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us.
Joh 14:9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?
That's just one.