7
7seasrekeyed
Guest
Maybe if she holds her breath till she turns blue and stamps her feet...
these women are an embarrassment to all NORMAL women everywhere
Maybe if she holds her breath till she turns blue and stamps her feet...
I guess it depends on whether Hitler was working with them, or against them. If Hitler was working with them, why should they want him brought to justice? Did you know the US imported many Nazis after World War II, rather than bringing them to trial? Does that not strike you as odd, given that you believe the Nazis were so evil and the Allies so good?
What evidence? Convict him of what? You're not understanding that just because there is evidence that someone murdered 3 women at a Dairy Queen in Bermuda, doesn't make him guilty of ordering the deaths by gassing of 6 million religious adherents. Evidence or proof of one crime isn't proof of another.
I honestly do not know why anyone keeps any conversation going with ratmouse
his entire argument goes something like this:
rat: you say water is wet but I hold it is not because I myself have not verified it
other person: everyone in the world knows water is wet. there is evidence through the entire world that water is wet
rat: that is your opinion. I have not felt water so therefore it is not wet
other person: what is the matter with you? how can you say water is not wet when their is nothing but evidence that water is wet
rat: that proves absolutely nothing. what if the people who say water is wet have defective nerves and experience something that is not true? that means water is not wet
other person: (becoming irritated and justifiably so) everyone knows water is wet!
rat: well I don't know that and that makes your statement false
ratmouse cannot get off the exercise wheel in his little cage but he seems to be doing a good job of getting others to join him on it
![]()
The word is conspiracy. He was as guilty as Himmler and Goebbels, if he knew and did nothing to stop it. Besides he tried himself. Poison and a bullet to the temple was his self imposed punishment. It was probley less pain full than the ways the Russians or Patton would have finished him off.I guess it depends on whether Hitler was working with them, or against them. If Hitler was working with them, why should they want him brought to justice? Did you know the US imported many Nazis after World War II, rather than bringing them to trial? Does that not strike you as odd, given that you believe the Nazis were so evil and the Allies so good?
What evidence? Convict him of what? You're not understanding that just because there is evidence that someone murdered 3 women at a Dairy Queen in Bermuda, doesn't make him guilty of ordering the deaths by gassing of 6 million religious adherents. Evidence or proof of one crime isn't proof of another.
Isn't that the crux of the issue? To convict someone of a crime, first, the precise detail of the crime/s should be established. In this case, whether deliberate or circumstantial abuse of prisoners, or murder of the same, or systematic murder of those of a particular group etc. Then a link to establish this came about as a directive. Certainly, the number/s of prisoners this would apply to would be important, also their names. Or perhaps it was a crime of negligence, in that the accused should have been aware, but wasn't. To my thinking, a directive would be far more evil than negligence.Is then your main argument that we have no evidence that Hitler was aware of/or ordered the deaths?
I simply try to respond to what is said. There are so many emotional appeals being made, which seem to rely on the horrific nature of what is alleged rather than evidence, to be accepted. I believe the debate started when I indicated that the Communists did and still do treat many Christians far worse than the Nazis treated detainees at their concentration camps.You touch on so many things I am finding it difficult to understand you main contention.
Guilty of a different crime. However, I don't know there is proof that Hitler even knew of any mass gassings of concentration camp detainees, let alone ordered them.The word is conspiracy. He was as guilty as Himmler and Goebbels, if he knew and did nothing to stop it.
Patton was not a criminal, to my knowledge. I doubt Patton would have been evil in exacting any justice upon Hitler, and therefore, I doubt Hitler's punishment would have been any more painful under General Patton (if left solely to Patton, which it likely would not have been).Besides he tried himself. Poison and a bullet to the temple was his self imposed punishment. It was probley less pain full than the ways the Russians or Patton would have finished him off.
I didn't hint that Patton was evil however If Hitler was found guilty of accessory to crimes against humanity the death penalty would most surely be in order. Don't forget Patton slapped for being a coward that was in the hospital for shell shock. I would certainly agree Stalin had it comming too.Guilty of a different crime. However, I don't know there is proof that Hitler even knew of any mass gassings of concentration camp detainees, let alone ordered them.
Patton was not a criminal, to my knowledge. I doubt Patton would have been evil in exacting any justice upon Hitler, and therefore, I doubt Hitler's punishment would have been any more painful under General Patton (if left solely to Patton, which it likely would not have been).
This said, I don't believe there ever was adequate evidence to prove that Hitler even died. Even Stalin (a far worse murderer than Hitler, to my mind) indicated later in the year that he believed Hitler had escaped to Spain.
The word is conspiracy. He was as guilty as Himmler and Goebbels, if he knew and did nothing to stop it. Besides he tried himself. Poison and a bullet to the temple was his self imposed punishment. It was probley less pain full than the ways the Russians or Patton would have finished him off.
Yeah, he was nuts.I highly doubt that Hitler viewed his suicide as self-imposed punishment.
He knew it would be better than allowing himself to stand trial for his war crimes. Plus, his grand scheme failed. He failed.Why would he punish himself?
He knew it would be better than allowing himself to stand trial for his war crimes. Plus, his grand scheme failed. He failed.
It could have been six of one and half a dozen of the other. Cowardice would also be seen as a weakness by him. He failed and he knew it. Isn't that why people kill themselves? Punishment means rough handling. Suicide certainly qualifies.Yes I understand this, however he was not inflicting punishment he was demonstrating his ultimate cowardice as the Russians were at the door.