Yeah that was what happenedThe Church got it straight after the Resurrection. The Jews that didn’t follow Jesus kept what they already had since Moses to this day.
But what about us based on those verses
Yeah that was what happenedThe Church got it straight after the Resurrection. The Jews that didn’t follow Jesus kept what they already had since Moses to this day.
Hmmm...what exactly should we followI think it goes something like this
If your trying to obey commands by self will. You will fail
If your loving God and all others (even your enemy) by nature you will keep the commands.
The cammonds b y themselves did not teach how to obey them, only the end result. Jesus, in this passage, showed the secret to obeying them
How did we come to be not under law?
Yeah that was what happened
But what about us based on those verses
'not under law' is not the same thing as 'do not obey the law'
Suppose you have two people, one under law and one above it. In both cases the individual can either keep or disregard the law - but the one under it, if he disregards it, is liable to be punished under the law, however the one not under it, if he does not keep the law, is not liable to be punished by the law.
This doesn't change anything about the goodness or injustice of whatever law we're talking about - and doesn't say anything about whether the person not under the law can or cannot do the things in the law ((whatever arbitrary law we talk about)). It just means the person not under law is not compelled by the law at all, not required, not punished, not condemned - but the person under the law is, in every way.
One individual is free and the other is not.
I'm not a law-keeper, but I still haven't found a single piece of evidence -- in the Gospels -- that Jesus ever told us to stop keeping the Law. Should we rely solely on what Paul said?
I'm not a law-keeper, but I still haven't found a single piece of evidence -- in the Gospels -- that Jesus ever told us to stop keeping the Law. Should we rely solely on what Paul said?
Christ taught "follow me". Do you refute that? Christ obeyed His Father in regard to honoring the days His Father told Him to honor. Are you also opposed to this fact?
I'm not a law-keeper, but I still haven't found a single piece of evidence -- in the Gospels -- that Jesus ever told us to stop keeping the Law. Should we rely solely on what Paul said?
I think jesus said it best, the law of love, Love the lord our God and our neighborHmmm...what exactly should we follow
When Jesus came to us first He waqs teaching agains what is now referred to as rabbinical teachings, those things the Pharisees were teaching also.Carefully research what you think were His Law breaches which were actually commandments of the Pharisees. Even so it was wisdom to not offend those men lest one be stoned by them. The Pharisees dared sit in Moses’ seat.
There was no provision for man to observe sabbath day until Moses. It was made part of the observances, not for gentiles who had their own laws. So when Jesus died to the Law He died to that seventh day sabbath along with it. That authorized Paul to declare an end of all observances including Passover, among New Covenant believers. Reviving those elements would end faith benefits and resume carnal living appeasing flesh.
Galatians chapter three is your answer.
Marcelo said: The purpose of this thread is to show that Jesus and Paul didn't preach the exact same thing as most, if not all, traditional churches teach.
So jesus and paul contradicted each other?![]()
I'm not a law-keeper, but I still haven't found a single piece of evidence -- in the Gospels -- that Jesus ever told us to stop keeping the Law. Should we rely solely on what Paul said?
Hi Marcelo, that's true, but only in Matthew. Mark, Luke and John use the "kingdom of God" only, as does Matthew several times, along with the "kingdom of Heaven". Luke uses the "kingdom of God" extensively, but I believe he is referring to the same thing that Matthew was when he used "the kingdom of heaven", wasn't he?Jesus preached the kingdom of heaven. Paul did not.
What is being taught by Him in verses like these if it is not salvation by faith?Paul preached justification by faith alone. Jesus did not. What are we to make of this? Can the two be reconciled? The answer depends on what is meant by reconciliation.
Did he/was it? Hi again Marcelo, if that's true, then doesn't it seem a bit odd to you that they knew, loved and trusted Paul as a dearly beloved brother in Christ, as an evangelist and teacher, as a leader, and as one of the human author's of the NT? For instance, from the whole church at Jerusalem, incl the members of the church council there we read:Here’s a clue: let the reader consider why God kept Paul separated from the Twelve after his conversion and why Paul’s contact with the Twelve was extremely limited (cf. Galatians 1.1, 11-12, 15-19).
It's true that Jesus preached and performed miracles in/for the people of the Nations, but His principle focus was clearly on Israel.Jesus:
5. Had Jews as His audience (a couple exceptions)
Paul:
1. Preached the gospel of the grace of God
5. Had Gentiles as his primary audience
Hi Marcelo, What Paul wrote is from the Lord and therefore scripture.
I'm not a law-keeper, but I still haven't found a single piece of evidence -- in the Gospels -- that Jesus ever told us to stop keeping the Law. Should we rely solely on what Paul said?