Feeling offended has more weight than truth, how sad
What do you expect from a committed Communist? She endorsed Bernie Sanders for President in 2016.By the way, I love how she's telling women what to do with their own bodies.
To be fair, the Germans had no ambitions of conquering the US. If the US hadn't entered WWII because of too many snow-flakes, the Germans would most likely have trounced the Commies, putting an end to this vile religion before it could even begin, and saving millions of lives in the 20th century. This said, the Japanese were a cut-throat lot, and would likely have made up for in their killing, the lives spared from Communism...We would be speaking German right now, and the laughing stock of the post WW ll world. Thank God there were real men around in those days.
To be fair, the Germans had no ambitions of conquering the US. If the US hadn't entered WWII because of too many snow-flakes, the Germans would most likely have trounced the Commies, putting an end to this vile religion before it could even begin, and saving millions of lives in the 20th century. This said, the Japanese were a cut-throat lot, and would likely have made up for in their killing, the lives spared from Communism...
To be fair, the Germans had no ambitions of conquering the US. If the US hadn't entered WWII because of too many snow-flakes, the Germans would most likely have trounced the Commies, putting an end to this vile religion before it could even begin, and saving millions of lives in the 20th century. This said, the Japanese were a cut-throat lot, and would likely have made up for in their killing, the lives spared from Communism...
Not really. Hitler's party didn't kill and murder their own (as the Communists did), and there's no evidence his wish was to take over the world. He didn't even want to take over the UK, sparing the Allied troops at Dunkirk (in opposition to his generals wishes) and letting them escape, instead of slaying or capturing them.Hitler wouldn't have tried to take over the US? I think that would be exactly where he was headed, his wish was to take over the world. While I disagree with Communism, Hitler's party was just as vile.
Not really. Hitler's party didn't kill and murder their own (as the Communists did), and there's no evidence his wish was to take over the world. He didn't even want to take over the UK, sparing the Allied troops at Dunkirk (in opposition to his generals wishes) and letting them escape, instead of slaying or capturing them.
I guess until one of us provides proof, this is just going to be your opinion against mine.Sorry, you're wrong, Hitler did kill his own, anyone who disagreed with him he had killed. As he came to power he had people murdered that were in his way. He also murdered 6 million + Jews and others who he thought were "unfit" which leads us round the circle to Planned Parenthood,Margret Sanger and eugenics.
Nazism is to Communism as patriotic corruption is to genocide. Sure, both were wrong, but Communism is far worse. One only needs to look at the numbers killed, and how killed, to realise this. Unless one has a preconceived reason for favouring Communism.Both Nazism and Communism were and are a blight on the world. One was not worse or better than the other.
I guess until one of us provides proof, this is just going to be your opinion against mine.
Can you be more specific? Who do you mean? He didn't kill his own people, his soldiers, who?
Nazism is to Communism as patriotic corruption is to genocide. Sure, both were wrong, but Communism is far worse. One only needs to look at the numbers killed, and how killed, to realise this. Unless one has a preconceived reason for favouring Communism.
I don't know if one has a reason to favor Communism. But both were equally as dastardly. Hitler had the Jews gassed, tortured, took all they owned and murdered women and children,along with men. He murdered anyone who tried to hide them. And as I said,used eugenics against those he saw as unfit,which is still being done today thanks to racist Planned Parenthood. Communism also murdered innocent people and again, as I said, both are a blight to society to this day. Both are from the pit of hell, both equally wrong.
Which part?Hitler was part Jewish
I thought he retired to Brazil?didn't he kill himself in he end?
Agreed. One can argue with rats, one can argue with mice, at least one knows where one stands. One can even argue with He-rats which pose as leaders of circus-mice, although one is bound to lose such arguments. But rodent-fluid entities - better just to take these to the vet.I wouldn't argue with a rat mouse entity though![]()
I guess until one of us provides proof, this is just going to be your opinion against mine.
Nazism is to Communism as patriotic corruption is to genocide. Sure, both were wrong, but Communism is far worse. One only needs to look at the numbers killed, and how killed, to realise this. Unless one has a preconceived reason for favouring Communism.
A simple explanation is that Communism is closer to Satanic, whereas Nazism is closer to worldly. The same as emperor Nero was a more evil emperor than Nebuchadnezzar. Nero hated God's people and tortured them in order to get them to renounce God. Nebuchadnezzar's evil was in his own pride, but in the end, he acknowledged God's greatness.Hummm, no answer given to my answer, I'll wait on that one. Of course Under Grace agrees with anything anti-Jew. Finds any post they can against Jews and hits like. Must be sad to hate people that much.
A simple explanation is that Communism is closer to Satanic, whereas Nazism is closer to worldly. The same as emperor Nero was a more evil emperor than Nebuchadnezzar. Nero hated God's people and tortured them in order to get them to renounce God. Nebuchadnezzar's evil was in his own pride, but in the end, he acknowledged God's greatness.
Not really anything to do with Jews, so don't worry!Are you Messianic?
I think most of the people who starved in Germany in WWII were starved because the Allies bombed the food supplies. If this (starving prisoners to death) was so bad, it wouldn't have been done to the German POWs after WWII, but it was. So it is hypocritical to call Nazism evil for starving prisoners to death, but not calling out the evil of Allied governments who also starved German POWs to death.No, not Messianic, far worse, Pentecostal
I'm sorry I still disagree. I don't think anything is closer to satanic than throwing people like cattle into trains to be sent to concentration camps to be starved, tortured and then gassed. There is no doubt, Nazi's were satanic. To me satanic is satanic, I see don't see levels, all inspired of satan and from the pit of hell.
I think most of the people who starved in Germany in WWII were starved because the Allies bombed the food supplies. If this (starving prisoners to death) was so bad, it wouldn't have been done to the German POWs after WWII, but it was. So it is hypocritical to call Nazism evil for starving prisoners to death, but not calling out the evil of Allied governments who also starved German POWs to death.
I don't know how many people were tortured and gassed, but this pales in comparison to the 10s of millions of people (many Christians) starved and murdered and tortured and even eaten by Communist regimes. Communism and Nazism aren't even in the same league.
But if you disagree, that's your prerogative. Some people think serial killers are especially evil. Some think they are only as evil as any other murderer. I obviously think the former.