I wrote a position paper for Biblical Ethics on this topic. I will quote a few things that are most important. If you want to see the whole paper, pm me your email address, and I will send it to you. I will add my undergrad degree was in environmental studies, I live near the wilderness (a block away) and I have been an organic gardener for 45 years. So, here are some excerpts.
"The question of whether a Christian should care about the environment must be answered by a study of God’s Word, not just personal experience. Is there support for the viewpoint that God intends us to pursue good stewardship, eco-justice or even creation spirituality?
[1]This paper will address the Biblical admonitions to care for the earth, including the consequences if we do not. (Lev. 25:2 and Lev. 26:14-17, 32-35 – compare with Ezek. 34:18, and Isa. 24:4-6, Hosea 4:3, and Jer. 12:4
[2])
R.J. Berry who notes in his book “Religion (particularly Judaism and Christianity), is commonly blamed from encouraging environmental misuse: many Christians regard environmental care as less important than evangelism or poverty relief. We are mere transients and it does not matter how we treat this world.”
[3] Preston Bristow, also says, “that the bestselling Christian fiction series of all time is the
Left Behind series by Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins, which is about the last days. … If this world and everything in it is headed for destruction, then why should we worry about some ecological degradation along the way?”
[4]
Since Lynn White Jr. first published his ground-breaking essay, “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis” in 1967, Christianity has been a scapegoat because “anthropocentric [Christian] religion established the dualism of man and nature, and insisted that it is God’s will that man exploit nature for its proper ends.”
[5]Because public awareness of the degradation of the environment seems to be reaching an all-time high and we need to respond as Christians. We must address personal salvation, but not ignore the greater issues of poverty in light of environmental decay. If we do not take responsibility for the land, then we will reap what we sow.
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation,
16 for all things in heaven and on earth were created in him—all things, whether visible or invisible, whether thrones or dominions, whether principalities or powers—all things were created through him and for him.
17 He himself is before all things and all things are held together in him.
18 He is the head of the body, the church, as well as the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, so that he himself may become first in all things.
19 For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in the Son
20 and through him to reconcile all things to himself by making peace through the blood of his cross—through him, whether things on earth or things in heaven. Col. 1:15-20 NET
The amazing Christological hymn, which Paul cites in Colossians 1:15:20, leads to a theology that is beyond individual salvation. Redemption is more expansive, in fact, cosmic in purpose and scope. In North America, the heart of salvation is a personal relationship with Jesus, who came to save us from our sins. But passages like Colossians 1 point the way to a much broader concept of cosmic salvation.
[6]
Richard Young notes in
Healing the Earth, that in the Old Testament, salvation basically meant deliverance from bondage, disease, trouble or enemies. In the New Testament, the idea of deliverance carries over the spiritual and moral connotations.
A cosmic understanding views both humanity and nature as being overpowered by the forces or decay and death, and in need of divine healing. This does not remove the idea of human sin from soteriological discussion: instead it moves it into the forefront, for it is sin that fractures relations and leads to the dying planet. Salvation can no longer be limited to humanity. Because humans are bound together with the rest of creation, what happens to one happens to the other. Nature was implicated in the Fall, so it will be included in the restoration.
[7]
Glen Stassen and David Gushee, in Kingdom Ethics, outline the three approaches to the Biblical theology of creation care. The “anthropocentric” approach places humans at the centre of concern. God did create the universe, but he did so for humans to have dominion over it for our benefit.
[8]Because we are intrinsically connected with the rest of the natural order, even this approach can be concerned about the environment, because of the negative impact on humanity, and the duties we owe to future generations.
[9] In practice, though, reliance upon the market place to regulate human society, in light of the sins of consumption and greed, leads to idolatry because of the right of humans to exploit the earth and the resources God created. This approach rarely considers Jesus’ teachings on the treasures of the heart and putting God first, and relies rather on the wicked human heart to regulate business, ethics and our concern for the environment.
The “bio-centric” approach gives no special status to human beings and invests equal intrinsic worth or value in all living creatures. Many world religions, such as Hinduism, Buddhism and native North American spiritualties, espouse this viewpoint.
[10] Movies such as Avatar, the popular 3-D movie that was shown in theatres all over the world, motivate people to be “connected” with the spirituality of the earth, in a frightening New Age or pantheistic holistic reverence, which sees nature itself as holy and worthy of worship. This worldview perverts the message of Scripture, and instead of emphasizing the need for redemption of humanity and nature, it downplays humanity’s special place in the plan of creation as divine image bearers. The bio-centric approach emphasizes the original blessing of creation, human goodness, divine immanence and the exclusion of sin and forgetting the essential transcendent and sovereign nature of God.
[11]
[1]Willis J. Jenkins,
Ecologies of Grace:Environmental Ethics and Christian Theology, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 18.
[2]Granberg-Michaelson Wesley,
Ecology and Life: accepting our environmental responsibility, (Waco, Texas: Word Publishers, 1988), 57-59.
[3]R. J. Berry, When Enough is Enough: A Christian Framework for Environmental Sustainability, (Hampshire, Great Britain: Apollos- Intervarsity Press, 2007), 27.
[4]Preston Bristow, “The root of our ecological crisis,” first published in the
Journal of Creation, April 2007, 15(1): 76-79,
http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i1/ecology.asp(accessed 2010-10-28)
[5Jr. Lynn White,
The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis, Vol. 155 #3767 (Washington , DC: Science Magazine, Mar 10, 1967), 1207.
[6]Richard A. Young,
Healing the Earth: a theocentric perspective on environmental problems and their solutions, (Nashville, Tenn: Broadman and Holman Publishers, 1994), 147.
[7]Ibid.
[8]Glen. H. Stassen and David P. Gushee,
Kingdom Ethics: Following Jesus in Contemporary Context, (Downer's Grove, Ill.: IVP Academic, 2003) 435.
[9]Ibid.
[10]Ibid., 437
[11]Ibid., 438.