Why Christians get a bad rap amongst the Jews...(an example)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
Don't you at least "wonder" why Joshua 21: 43-45 and Nehemiah 9: 8 say what they do ? 1 Kings 4: 21 ... not impressed ? Oh well ... conquer onward.

Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Kuwait ... and most likely one or two more, we're coming for you. And don't simply "secede" your territory, because technically, that doesn't equate to being conquered.

Not understanding the difference between spiritual Israel and earthly Israel ... not understanding the difference between figurative and literal prophecy fulfillment leads to this, and a myriad of other "inevitable conclusions", including Christ's glorious presence and Him giving approval of animal sacrifices being reinstated in yet a 3rd temple. Glorified saints co-existing with fleshly bodies. And one day after a thousand years has passed, the fleshy inhabitants of the millenial reign are going to say of Christ's glorified presence ... " you know what ... He's nothing without his chompers". Let's overpower this guy. This is what you get folks. And on and on I could go.
And you are still saying nothing and have not proven anything.......the LAND has not been conquered yet which = future fulfillment.....now...if ALL you is the drivel like above....move on and do not address me....!!
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
Actually yes it is

A figure is a symbol, which us used to represent something,

Again, even daniel used figures (statues and beasts) to represent literal things, but the things the fugure represented literally came true

Example. Nebuchadnezzar was the head of Gold, A figure was used to represent him and four other kingdoms, Yet th ekingdoms were literal kingdoms, not spiriual truths that were not literal
The fact that she laughed at what you said which was correct proves she really has no intent to understand the truth..........and like I have said......her mind was made up already!
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
Israel's eternal inheritance is given by God all the way to the river Euphrates......they do NOT possess this, have not conquered this and are still limited to the range of the Golan Heights......everyone of you that flippantly reject this truth, laugh at this truth, ignore this truth absolutely prove that you are neither HONEST and or HAVE NO INTEREST in the truth..........All I have seen are flippant answers, a rejection of truth, snide laughter and NO FULFILLMENT of this GOD given statement in Joshua 1:4.....shakes head at the rejection of truth!
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Actually yes it is

A figure is a symbol, which us used to represent something,

Again, even daniel used figures (statues and beasts) to represent literal things, but the things the fugure represented literally came true

Example. Nebuchadnezzar was the head of Gold, A figure was used to represent him and four other kingdoms, Yet th ekingdoms were literal kingdoms, not spiriual truths that were not literal
There is no such things as symbolic prophesy,
This seems contradictory to me?
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,770
3,679
113
This seems contradictory to me?
I believe E.G. means that there is no prophecy that gets fulfilled symbolically, prophecy has a literal fulfillment. I thought E.G. was crystal clear on the matter.
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
Israel's eternal inheritance is given by God all the way to the river Euphrates......they do NOT possess this, have not conquered this and are still limited to the range of the Golan Heights......everyone of you that flippantly reject this truth, laugh at this truth, ignore this truth absolutely prove that you are neither HONEST and or HAVE NO INTEREST in the truth..........All I have seen are flippant answers, a rejection of truth, snide laughter and NO FULFILLMENT of this GOD given statement in Joshua 1:4.....shakes head at the rejection of truth!

And the Government is a Messiah/king headed theocracy with judges and councilors (Isaiah 1:26) and not as today nor in the past because the ones in those land boundaries don't acknowledge that the king Messiah is Jesus (Luke 19:38) even to this day.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
I believe E.G. means that there is no prophecy that gets fulfilled symbolically, prophecy has a literal fulfillment. I thought E.G. was crystal clear on the matter.
The dissonance is between concrete and abstract then...

A prophecy whether described literally or metaphorically/figuratively using symbols, would never be an abstraction, would always have a concrete manifestation either physically or spiritually.

When the discussion becomes whether something is literal or metaphorical/figurative it becomes more about the way the words work which is a problem, as opposed to delineating between the real and the abstract...but I get it now
Thanks:)
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
Begin at ad70 and say it was symbolic,,,go to the Resurrection of Jesus and say it wasn't literal,,,then to the cross, and and then his birth,,,,work you way back to the red sea and if it was parted literally or symbolic. Sodom and Gomorrah was real or not, the Flood? You see you don't believe anything was not literal until the RCC told us to in the ad300's...
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,770
3,679
113
You see you don't believe anything was not literal until the RCC told us to in the ad300's...
You were making some sort of hypothetical case and then threw in that non sequiter. I don't get it.
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
lol, I'm on your side Crossnote,,,I believe it's literal,,,lol
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
You were making some sort of hypothetical case and then threw in that non sequiter. I don't get it.

Well lets see if any of those who try to spiritualze this all away can start at ad70 and work their way backward and say the prophecies meant the Greeks didn't literately rule or that Nebuchadnezzar didnt acctually come and put bonds on them and lead them literally into captivity. I bet they cant find a thing they will try to spiritualize away,lol...
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
Begin at ad70 and say it was symbolic,,,go to the Resurrection of Jesus and say it wasn't literal,,,then to the cross, and and then his birth,,,,work you way back to the red sea and if it was parted literally or symbolic. Sodom and Gomorrah was real or not, the Flood? You see you don't believe anything was not literal until the RCC told us to in the ad300's...
Why begin at ad70 rather than the time of reformation.... the veil is rent the government in the twinkling of the eye is restored to the period of Judges.

The ressurection was real as a real demonstration of the unseen promise to Joel and others. The holy Spirit pouring out his unseen spirit as if he was pouring out literal blood. God is not a man as us.

In that way it helps us under stand that jesus said of his own flesh it did not propfit as a demonstration according to what the eyes see the corrupted flesh of Christ typified as sinful which was necessary to put away sin in the flesh a work the letter of the law could not do.

Romans 1:4And declared to be the "Son of God" with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:

Not by his birth, by it he was declared the Son of man, Jesus... perfect man. God is not a man as us.

How would what the RCC told us to in the ad300's have anything to do with believing anything was not literal if they literally make the word of God without effect by claiming to be a equal DEVINE power?
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
Why begin at ad70 rather than the time of reformation.... the veil is rent the government in the twinkling of the eye is restored to the period of Judges.

The ressurection was real as a real demonstration of the unseen promise to Joel and others. The holy Spirit pouring out his unseen spirit as if he was pouring out literal blood. God is not a man as us.

In that way it helps us under stand that jesus said of his own flesh it did not propfit as a demonstration according to what the eyes see the corrupted flesh of Christ typified as sinful which was necessary to put away sin in the flesh a work the letter of the law could not do.

Romans 1:4And declared to be the "Son of God" with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:

Not by his birth, by it he was declared the Son of man, Jesus... perfect man. God is not a man as us.

How would what the RCC told us to in the ad300's have anything to do with believing anything was not literal if they literally make the word of God without effect by claiming to be a equal DEVINE power?

Because God never,ever said he was going to do something and did not literally fulfill it from the beginning up till then? Do you have an example?
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,770
3,679
113
The holy Spirit pouring out his unseen spirit as if he was pouring out literal blood. God is not a man as us.
I can't believe you said that. Crass Gnosticism. It was REAL LITERAL BLOOD... not 'As If'

Hebrews 2:14 KJV
[14] Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;

Hebrews 9:12 KJV
[12] Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us .

Hebrews 9:14 KJV
[14] How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?

Hebrews 9:22 KJV
[22] And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.

Hebrews 10:29 KJV
[29] Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?

Hebrews 13:12 KJV
[12] Wherefore Jesus also, that he might sanctify the people with his own blood, suffered without the gate.

Acts 20:28 KJV
[28] Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
That's it they literally drove those nails in our Lords hands,and he literally bled,they litterally spit on him and litterally stuck a spear in his side,,,not even the best of the spiritualist will deny that....
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,770
3,679
113
That's it they literally drove those nails in our Lords hands,and he literally bled,they litterally spit on him and litterally stuck a spear in his side,,,not even the best of the spiritualist will deny that....
And He literally died.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
That's it they literally drove those nails in our Lords hands,and he literally bled,they litterally spit on him and litterally stuck a spear in his side,,,not even the best of the spiritualist will deny that....
Oh they will try for sure.....