U
UnderGrace
Guest
The LAW and the Prophets were until JOHN......not 70 A.D.
From John to the 70 AD was a transition period from one age to another.....God finally put an end to the Temple sacrifices as He prophesied He would.
The LAW and the Prophets were until JOHN......not 70 A.D.
objection your honor
they didnt ask about mosaic or christian times
what it means is end of this era, aion, world.
this aion and the aion to come, as Jesus says about blasphemy of the Holy Spirit.
From John to the 70 AD was a transition period from one age to another.....God finally put an end to the Temple sacrifices as He prophesied He would.
NAAAAA and the word AND connects the two.....the COMING of JESUS and the END of the AGE....
The LAW and the Prophets WERE UNTIL JOHN....JESUS said that....HE called his disciples out and they constituted the 1st CHURCH.....the building = nothing
NOTE......the context
the sign of YOUR coming and the consummation of the AGE
Coming is
parousia: a presence, a coming
Original Word: παρουσία, ας, ἡ
Part of Speech: Noun, Feminine
Transliteration: parousia
Phonetic Spelling: (par-oo-see'-ah)
Definition: a presence, a coming
Usage: (a) presence, (b) a coming, an arrival, advent, especially of the second coming of Christ
The word AND is
kai: and, even, also
Original Word: καί
Part of Speech: Conjunction
Transliteration: kai
Phonetic Spelling: (kahee)
Definition: and, even, also
Usage: and, even, also, namely.
The context of the last statement is directed at the BODY PRESENCE of CHRIST NAMELY or EVEN SO the END of the AGE
It is not about the destruction of the temple as an end of the age of the law and the prophets which were UNTIL JOHN
The GREEK makes very clear what is being said.....
dcontroversal do you believe most business will happen in jerusalem at antichrist reign? it will affect worlwide yes. but mostly in jerusalem and roman empire area?
i dont understand why jerusalem, few christians there and orthodox jews are already deceived. maybe the devil wants to get them to permanently prevent salvation by mark of the beast?
Mr. dcon the law passed away completely when the Temple was destroyed....but we can put that aside for now.
Okay, in my Bible Jesus starts with the Temple in verse 2.....really He does go look...I really mean it, He did.
The Jews rejected their Messiah. This did not happen with John.
That is a bold statement building = nothing, not to the Jews it was not nothing, it was the center of Jerusalem life.
Okay...if what you say is true then the question of the disciples should not have followed after Jesus made the statement about the Temple, but He would have reference John which He did not.
Nope......the LAW ended with JOHN as the last Prophet <---GRACE and TRUTH came BY JESUS CHRIST and the above post listing the Greek words and what they say is my view.....
but dcon how would orthodox jews ever accept a non-jewish messiah as Christ? thats why i believe beast has to be someone who can sell himself as counterfeit messiah.
I will again state that even though in the ENGLISH it comes across as three questions it is NOT so....it was ONE question and the question was concerning JESUS, his BODY presence and the end of the age....
yes Mr. Dcon..........But.........
Hebrews 9:8 (NASB) The Holy Spirit is signifying this, that the way into the holy place has not yet been disclosed, while the outer tabernacle is still standing,
As long as the temple was still standing, the Law was still in effect, and man did not have access to the presence of God. Now, since the Law was in effect until A.D. 70, we know that it did not end at the birth of Christ or at the Cross or at Pentecost.
Jesus Himself told us exactly when the Law would end:
Matthew 5:17-18 (NASB) "Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill. 18 "For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass away from the Law, until all is accomplished.
WRONG WRONG WRONG......THE VEIL was RIPPED from top to BOTTOM with the death of CHRIST some 37 YEARS before the destruction of the temple.......
WOW.....no offence Grace, but you are missing a big chunk of the puzzle....THE LAW is only in effect for the LAWLESS and condemns MAN....it had NOTHING to do with the temple in JERUSALEM
Are you yelling at me??
I prefer you did not.
AS a matter of fact.....JESUS even told the woman at the well that NEITHER in JERUSALEM and or Samaria NO ONE was worshiping GOD....we need to fully understand that the LAW and the Prophets ENDED with JOHN as far as a dispensation GOES....JESUS began a NEW dispensation which was ratified with his DEATH......