I has been my experience that Most Pentecostals and Charismatics will ALWAYS ATTACK, when someone has an opinion OPPOSITE of their holy grail. The first family get together, after I wrote the Original A NON-CHARISMATIC UNDERSTANDING OF TONGUES ended up with two of Sister-inlaws actually yelling at me from across the dining room table during lunch. That is why I started this post our with: I DO NOT WANT A DEBATE ON THIS SUBJECT, hoping to avoid the inevitable ARGUMENT from the Charismatic and Pentecostal side of the issue.
In my opinion, their instant headed ARGUMENT, verifies it is NOT OF GOD.
In my opinion, their instant headed ARGUMENT, verifies it is NOT OF GOD.
Take the argument about how we show Jesus has transformed us and how we are reassured we
are His. Sensitivity just shows its importance to that person, not that they are right or wrong.
And the problem with saying something is not of God, and it is a spiritual experience of some sort,
invested in Gods presence, you are saying that whole persons experience is deceived or deluded.
That strikes at the core of a whole belief system, which is totally judgemental and confrontational.
One maybe right, but to say such a thing as if it is some doctrinal interpretation of scripture and
not a rejection of someones expression of life in Christ, is not taking seriously the words being spoken.
The apostles were very careful about this. They talked of testing the spirits and the people involved.
It was separating out group issues in general to the reality it is a one to one issue. A prophet could
either be false or true, unless one says prophecy itself is now defunct. And if a prophet could be false
they must be tested along with the prophecy. I believe in both prophecy, and also that there are true
prophets, but there certainly are both false prophets and false prophecy.