that is your presupposition.
I am not in any way able to speak for all Church or even the many on the gifts of the Holy Spirit, what I am able to do is prove that Gifts of the Holy Spirit found in 1cor 12 thru 14 have not been done away with. So your attempt to over reach and assume I am all knowing was an error on your part.
when you say "I have seen tongues used in the NT, we have wintess to them, I have also seen prophesy all through scrioture. We again see proof of them. Just because they happened then does nto mean they happen today."
Your comment is opinionated and you did not even use one verse to support your claim.
I am not in any way able to speak for all Church or even the many on the gifts of the Holy Spirit, what I am able to do is prove that Gifts of the Holy Spirit found in 1cor 12 thru 14 have not been done away with. So your attempt to over reach and assume I am all knowing was an error on your part.
when you say "I have seen tongues used in the NT, we have wintess to them, I have also seen prophesy all through scrioture. We again see proof of them. Just because they happened then does nto mean they happen today."
Your comment is opinionated and you did not even use one verse to support your claim.
post 403
EG said " I have seen tongues used in the NT, we have wintess to them, I have also seen prophesy all through scrioture. We again see proof of them. Just because they happened then does nto mean they happen today. And what I have witnessed looks NOTHING like what was happening back then.
you will find the context to my comment with post #403
This is the Proof that I said the following in context to EG who said "what is in Red.
People you be the judge is his comments are nor saying they gifts do not happen today. I then said :
in post410
that is your presupposition.
I am not in any way able to speak for all Church or even the many on the gifts of the Holy Spirit, what I am able to do is prove that Gifts of the Holy Spirit found in 1cor 12 thru 14 have not been done away with. So your attempt to over reach and assume I am all knowing was an error on your part.
EG from post 403
when you say "I have seen tongues used in the NT, we have wintess to them, I have also seen prophesy all through scrioture. We again see proof of them. Just because they happened then does nto mean they happen today."
CS1
"Your comment is opinionated and you did not even use one verse to support your claim. "
Now you are a liar too. and falsely accusing me read and weep.