Your questions are becoming more leading now, but to the extent that the home was actually STOLEN from the past owners, no, I would not feel comfortable living in it.
Now, if you're just talking about the home being "stolen" in the sense that it was legally repossessed from deadbeat owners who couldn't or wouldn't make their house payment, then I would be ok with that--but I wouldn't consider that the home was really "stolen" in that case.
You could stretch that idea to say that all of us who are not Native Americans are living on "stolen" property, but to the extent that the property has been obtained legally (no matter how fairly you think the law was written or enforced), then no, we're not living on stolen land. Most Native American tribes didn't have a concept of "owning" land anyway, so it couldn't have been stolen from their possession.