Fox News Hannity and Trump try to claim "knew nothing about" hush money payment

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
#1
“I can tell you, personally, he said to me, at least a dozen times, that he made the decision on the payments and he didn’t tell you,” Hannity offered, seemingly out of the blue, during his discussion with Trump.

The above does not stand in light of the phone conversation recorded between Trump and Cohen:


From splinternews.com:

Fox News personality and human-shaped lump of earwax Sean Hannity may be very good at whispering sweet nothings into Donald Trump’s ear, but during his Thursday night interview with the president, Hannity may have flapped his gums a little too much.

Nothing that “I was kind of dragged in, a little bit, into the Michael Cohen issue,” Hannity let slip that he and Cohen had discussed the illegal hush money payments Trump’s former attorney had paid—allegedly on behalf of and at the direction of Trump himself—to porn star Stormy Daniels and Playboy playmate Karen McDougal.

I can tell you, personally, he said to me, at least a dozen times, that he made the decision on the payments and he didn’t tell you,” Hannity offered, seemingly out of the blue, during his discussion with Trump.

As Hannity noted earlier in the interview, he and Cohen have a complicated relationship, to say the least. According to Cohen’s attorney, Hannity was Cohen’s secret “third client”—something Hannity has denied, and claims Cohen has since retracted the claim (Why no one brought this up during Cohen’s congressional hearing on Wednesday is one of life’s little unsolved mysteries, I suppose).

But given that Democrats are already licking their chops to talk to anyone invoked by Cohen during his testimony, it sure seems like, if he wasn’t already on the list of potential witnesses to be dragged in for a congressional interview on the hows and whys of the hush money payments, Hannity’s admission on Thursday would land him there now.

“[The people mentioned by Cohen] have a good chance of hearing from us — at least an interview,” House Oversight Committee chair Rep. Elijah Cummings told reporters on Thursday. “We’ll go through it, we’ll figure out who we want to talk to, and we’ll bring them in.”

Of course, this doesn’t mean Sean is guaranteed to make a House appearance. But in this instance, his tried and true method of putting the spotlight squarely on himself may have lead to the exact sort of scrutiny he would probably like to avoid.

So nice work, Sean: Looks like your attempt at obsequious boot licking could backfire pretty spectacularly. Smart stuff.

Source:

https://splinternews.com/sean-hannity-mightve-just-blabbed-a-bit-too-hard-1832984920

Link to discussion between Hannuty and Trump:

 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,614
9,127
113
#2
Alleged Threats, Bribes, Prostitutes: Growing Scandal Threatens to Bring Down Canada’s Trudeau
Former Canadian Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould gave a bombshell testimony accusing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and other officials of “veiled threats” to force her to drop a case for political purposes.
Ms Wilson-Raybould gave testimony before the Canadian House of Commons justice committee for several hours on Wednesday, speaking out against members of staff and Prime Minister Trudeau attempting to interfere with an investigation into the SNC-Lavalin corporation, The Globe and Mail reports.

Accusations that the prime minister and the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) interfered with the SNC-Lavalin investigation first emerged on February 7th.

The engineering company, which is based in Quebec, was accused of engaging in bribery in Libya in efforts to secure lucrative contracts in the country.

Since the accusations were made public, further allegations have revealed that the corporation may also have gone as far as paying for prostitutes for Saadi Gadhafi, son of former Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi, during a visit to Canada in 2008.


Receipts claim that the company spent as much as $30,000 on prostitutes for Gadhafi while he was allegedly in Montreal and Toronto at the invitation of the company to learn English.

Initially, after the first Globe and Mail report on the SNC-Lavalin affair, the accusations were dismissed by Trudeau and the PMO.

Only weeks later, Trudeau’s chief adviser, and one of his closest confidants, Gerald Butts resigned abruptly from his position as principal secretary in the PMO.

Butts denied that his resignation had anything to do with the SNC-Lavalin affair saying accusations that he or others put pressure on former Attorney General Wilson-Raybould were “simply not true.”


Until Wednesday, Ms Wilson-Raybould had been unable to comment on the matter but was free to do so in front of the justice committee.

In her testimony, Wilson-Raybould made bombshell allegations towards Trudeau and the PMO saying, “For a period of approximately four months between September and December 2018, I experienced a consistent and sustained effort by many people within the government to seek to politically interfere in the exercise of prosecutorial discretion in my role as the Attorney General of Canada in an inappropriate effort to secure a Deferred Prosecution Agreement with SNC-Lavalin.”

“These events involved 11 people (excluding myself and my political staff) – from the Prime Minister’s Office, the Privy Council Office, and the Office of the Minister of Finance,” she added.


One of the most damning pieces of testimony involved an alleged discussion between Wilson-Raybould and Trudeau:

The Prime Minister asks me to help out – to find a solution here for SNC – citing that if there was no DPA there would be many jobs lost and that SNC will move from Montreal. In response, I explained to him the law… I told him that I had done my due diligence and made up my mind on SNC and that I was not going to interfere with the decision of the DPP.​
… At that point the PM jumped in stressing that there is an election in Quebec and that “and I am an MP in Quebec – the member for Papineau.” My response – and I remember this vividly – was to ask the PM a direct question while looking him in the eye – I asked: “Are you politically interfering with my role / my decision as the AG? I would strongly advise against it.” The Prime Minister said “No, No, No – we just need to find a solution.”​
The former Attorney General named several prominent politicians and staff who were engaged in pressuring her, some with “veiled threats.”
Among the names included former PMO head Gerald Butts, Minister of Finance Bill Morneau, and head of the Privy Council Office Michael Wernick.

The scandal has rocked the Canadian political scene and has led to calls from Conservative opposition lead Andrew Scheer for the prime minister to resign from office.

“As Ms Wilson-Raybould has so clearly articulated, the people Canadians entrusted to protect the integrity of our very nation were instead only protecting themselves and their friends,” Scheer said and added, “Mr Trudeau can no longer, in good standing and with a clear conscience, lead this great nation.”

Prime Minister Trudeau, meanwhile, rejected calls for his resignation saying that voters would get to decide their next prime minister at the upcoming national elections in October.
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
#3
Top House Democrat: Hannity should testify under oath about hush-money scheme:

A member of House Democratic leadership says it may be time to hear from Fox News host Sean Hannity -- under oath.

Rhode Island Rep. David Cicilline, who chairs the Democratic Policy and Communications Committee, said that Hannity's latest comments suggest he has information about hush money payments made by Trump's former personal attorney, Michael Cohen, to keep the then-presidential candidate's alleged extramarital affairs quiet in the days before the 2016 election. Trump later reimbursed Cohen for those payments.

"Sean Hannity volunteered first-hand knowledge about Michael Cohen's actions last night," Cicilline spokesman Francis Grubar told CNN. "If he was lying, it wouldn't be the first time. This is the same guy who claimed inside knowledge that Russia didn't hack the DNC until a federal judge ordered him to stop. Regardless, if he feels he has information that's relevant to this investigation, he should share it under oath before Congress."

On his television program Thursday night, Hannity told Trump that Cohen told him "at least a dozen times" that "he made the decision on the payments -- and he didn't tell you."

"He told me that personally," Hannity said to Trump.

The comment prompted Cicilline -- a member of the influential House Judiciary Committee -- to tweet Thursday: "Sean Hannity is now volunteering himself as a witness. I look forward to his testimony."

"I was dragged into the Michael Cohen issue," Hannity said on his show. "I interviewed him many times on TV. He was never my attorney. He did apologize to me for his attorney saying that in court."



Full "subpeona":

https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/01/politics/sean-hannity-michael-cohen-congress/index.html
 

JosephsDreams

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2015
4,313
468
83
#4
Maybe Hannity wants to get questioned by the house committee. Did that ever occur to you?
I like Hannity, but I must admit, your lump of clay description had me laughing.
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
#5
Oh sure, he wants to lose weight by sweating loads under oath laff.gif
 

JosephsDreams

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2015
4,313
468
83
#8
Most entertaining president in my life time. Maybe since Teddy Roosevelt. Less politicaln, more genuine people. By far. As long as he is against abortion, he gets my vote for his entertainment value alone. Of course there are reasons too.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
#9
Most entertaining president in my life time. Maybe since Teddy Roosevelt. Less politicaln, more genuine people. By far. As long as he is against abortion, he gets my vote for his entertainment value alone. Of course there are reasons too.
Yes, he love center stage, off script is indeed entertaining.

I am withholding my judgement still, too many speak a good line, but I try to remain hopeful, suffice to say if Trump does not keep the rest of promises and bring some indictments etc., I think there will be civil unrest.
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
42,663
17,117
113
69
Tennessee
#10
Most entertaining president in my life time. Maybe since Teddy Roosevelt. Less politicaln, more genuine people. By far. As long as he is against abortion, he gets my vote for his entertainment value alone. Of course there are reasons too.
I feel the same way, especially the part about being against abortion. I could never support any candidate, regardless of party or political views if that person was pro-choice, the choice of which usually resulting in the death of the unborn. At least that used to be the case, now the Democrats are supporting the death of babies already born. By any stretch of the imagination that is cold-blooded, premeditated murder. Bunch of sicko's.