good question.How do you account for John 20:22? Or was that not technically a baptism in the Holy Spirit; hence no tongues?
good question.How do you account for John 20:22? Or was that not technically a baptism in the Holy Spirit; hence no tongues?
If we are going to just accept every new revelation like the Charismatic Movement then we might as well accept the Muslims, Mormans, and Jehovah’s Witnesses.
Demons can be passed on through the laying on hands. I’ve heard Pentecostals say that if you can’t achieve tongues on your own then find a someone to impart the spirit on to you.
What did Peter preach? Acts 2:15-21 an explaination of Joel 2. Acts 2:22-36 Jesus is risen and exalted as Lord and Christ. Acts 2:37-47 Call to repent of unbelief and be born again by the Holy Spirit.wrong. Yet again you do not see what Peter said Fully. Your known un -wavering bais rises again. Acts 2:21
"And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.
37Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do? 38Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. 39For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.
Nice try. I’ll write it for you.He is speaking that in church he used less Tongues in order to communicate.
This is a no brainer because Tongues is language to God, not other humans with one exception:
22
Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe.
I’ve also noticed the part I’ve mentioned several times about testing spirits has been completely ignored by everyone that’s responded to my assertions.
I’ve also noticed that Pentecostals shy away when Jesus is mentioned and they keep wanting to go back to the book of acts. Jesus is Lord and Savior. Love God with all your heart, mind, strength, and soul and love others as yourself. Jesus didn’t command us to chase after the Holy Spirit for signs. We should desire them for the glory of God.
lol knew you would yet again discreditNot written by Mark. 16: 9-20 is contested and should be read with caution. And it always what people fall back on to defend their distortions. There is a lively discussion on the topic.
Guys look at this, even the moderators are agreeing with me. That tells you im right!Yet the word cessationist is not in the word of God . it is a created term by a secular humanist.
Sure do.lol knew you would yet again discredit
the Gospel of Mark end with verse 8 " 8 And they went out quickly, and fled from the sepulchre; for they trembled and were amazed: neither said they any thing to any man; for they were afraid. ".
and you think that is contextually correct?
A moderator that results to personal attacks.Guys look at this, even the moderators are agreeing with me. That tells you im right!
Nice try. I’ll write it for you.
“I thank God that I speak in tongues more than all of you. Nevertheless, in church I would rather speak five words with my mind in order to instruct others, than ten thousand words in a tongue.”
1 Corinthians 14:18-19 ESV
Thats funny, for cessationism there are 0 proof-texts. Oy vey!I have cited biblical references. You can stay blind to the truth if you wish. I’m done throwing my pearls to the pigs.
Discouraging is when people tell you. If you dont speak in tongues, then you are not a real christian.
And this I ever and ever heared. As well from pentecostals as from charismatics.
Without scripture proof, alone because of man doctrine.
Should I let me discourage because of this.
Since I became a christian I got the gift to destinguish the spirits. And when it comes to pentecostal and charismatic doctrine, my impression is that there a different spirit behind.
I’m not a cessationist and never used the word once.Thats funny, for cessationism there are 0 proof-texts. Oy vey!
Not written by Mark. 16: 9-20 is contested and should be read with caution. And it always what people fall back on to defend their distortions. There is a lively discussion on the topic.
John20: 22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:How do you account for John 20:22? Or was that not technically a baptism in the Holy Spirit; hence no tongues?
Well whats the problem then? If you believe the gifts are continuing, where is the rub?I’m not a cessationist and never used the word once.
A sign for the unbelievers to hear in their own language. Not a sign for other believers not to have a tongues revival in the church or any of that nonsense.18
I thank my God, I speak with tongues more than ye all:
19
Yet in the church I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that by my voice I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in an unknown tongue.
And then I posted:
22
Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe.
Now you are circle dancing![]()
A moderator that results to personal attacks.