-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E
Then you do not care about the kjv, the kjv is a word for word translation of text using 1600 AD olde english language.
If you desired the words in english you would look for a text which adequitely interprets eath though and meaning of the word, of which few have tried yet non have succeded, because in all translations, people use their personal biases to translate certain words or phrases
If you desired the words in english you would look for a text which adequitely interprets eath though and meaning of the word, of which few have tried yet non have succeded, because in all translations, people use their personal biases to translate certain words or phrases
That Joseph spoke Egyptian instead of Hebrew is evident by Genesis 42:23 "And they knew not that Joseph understood them; for he spake unto them by an interpreter." Joseph spoke in Egyptian yet his words are translated and recorded in another language, which turns out to be the inspired words of God.
A translation does not have to be a "word for word" literal carry over into another language for it to be the inspired word of God. If we have the God given text and the God given meaning of that text communicated by way of another language, as I firmly believe we do in the King James Bible, it is still the inspired word of God.
Again we see the same thing in Exodus chapters 4 through 14 where Moses confronts Pharaoh and speaks with him face to face. Pharaoh does not speak Hebrew, so Moses undoubtedly uses the Egyptian language in his verbal exchanges with him, yet the whole series of conversations is recorded in another inspired translation.
There are many more examples.
A translation does not have to be a "word for word" literal carry over into another language for it to be the inspired word of God. If we have the God given text and the God given meaning of that text communicated by way of another language, as I firmly believe we do in the King James Bible, it is still the inspired word of God.
Again we see the same thing in Exodus chapters 4 through 14 where Moses confronts Pharaoh and speaks with him face to face. Pharaoh does not speak Hebrew, so Moses undoubtedly uses the Egyptian language in his verbal exchanges with him, yet the whole series of conversations is recorded in another inspired translation.
There are many more examples.
E
I'll give you yet another example.
In Acts 22 we see another clear example of how a translation can be the inspired words of God. Acts 21:40 tells us: "And when he had given him licence, Paul stood on the stairs, and beckoned with the hand unto the people. And when there was made a great silence, HE SPAKE UNTO THEM IN THE HEBREW TONGUE, SAYING...". There then follows a lengthly sermon of 21 entire verses preached by Paul in the Hebrew tongue, yet not a word of this sermon is recorded in Hebrew but in inspired Greek. Was Paul's sermon inspired? Absolutely! But God also inspired the translation of this sermon into another language.
If no translation can be inspired of God, then how do those who hold this unbiblical position explain all the Old Testament quotes found in the New Testament? They were originally inspired in Hebrew but then the Holy Ghost took these verses and translated them into another inspired language.
Not only that, but the Holy Ghost sometimes did not use a strictly literal word for word rendering. God sometimes adds a little more detail or explains further or makes a different application of the original verse to a new situation. This is how God does it and what the Bible itself teaches us about inspired translations.
In Acts 22 we see another clear example of how a translation can be the inspired words of God. Acts 21:40 tells us: "And when he had given him licence, Paul stood on the stairs, and beckoned with the hand unto the people. And when there was made a great silence, HE SPAKE UNTO THEM IN THE HEBREW TONGUE, SAYING...". There then follows a lengthly sermon of 21 entire verses preached by Paul in the Hebrew tongue, yet not a word of this sermon is recorded in Hebrew but in inspired Greek. Was Paul's sermon inspired? Absolutely! But God also inspired the translation of this sermon into another language.
If no translation can be inspired of God, then how do those who hold this unbiblical position explain all the Old Testament quotes found in the New Testament? They were originally inspired in Hebrew but then the Holy Ghost took these verses and translated them into another inspired language.
Not only that, but the Holy Ghost sometimes did not use a strictly literal word for word rendering. God sometimes adds a little more detail or explains further or makes a different application of the original verse to a new situation. This is how God does it and what the Bible itself teaches us about inspired translations.
I am fairly confident that Joseph knew how to speak and understand Hebrew before he was sold into slavery.........and it is interesting to note that Moses penned the word exactly how many years after Joseph was dead and buried.......those that worship translations will never accept the fact that God only inspired HIS word to be penned in two primary languages.....with a little Chaldean and Aramaic "peppered" in........the simple truth is that they expect us to believe that God INSPIRED HOLY MEN to pen the word and then later inspired 54 false teachers, in a false religion, with direct orders from a pagan, witch burning, pedophile King to pen his word.......Yeah....not buying it......
It is a translation, transliteration with some of it copied verbatim from previous English versions....And this "the above" comes from one that uses a King James, yet goes to the original every step of the way....
It is a translation, transliteration with some of it copied verbatim from previous English versions....And this "the above" comes from one that uses a King James, yet goes to the original every step of the way....
-
1
- Show all
Moses wrote in Hebrew and was inspired by God to write in Hebrew......he did not translate some Egyptian Hieroglyphics into Hebrew....nor did he translate from some written Egyptian book detailing what took place....
What exactly is your point......the bible as originally written and FINISHED in the 1st Century A.D. was inspired in Hebrew and Greek......even though it gives the details and words recorded in numerous languages...such as Chaldean, Egyptian, Assyrian, Aramaic, Latin etc.....
What exactly is your point......the bible as originally written and FINISHED in the 1st Century A.D. was inspired in Hebrew and Greek......even though it gives the details and words recorded in numerous languages...such as Chaldean, Egyptian, Assyrian, Aramaic, Latin etc.....