Yes. This is not even a secondary issue. Thirdary?Thats why we should not attack each other on things like this.. It just makes us look bad. Which in turn reflects on God. Because we ar esupposed to represent God
Yes. This is not even a secondary issue. Thirdary?Thats why we should not attack each other on things like this.. It just makes us look bad. Which in turn reflects on God. Because we ar esupposed to represent God
Nations have hated Gods people since nations were first created. If this is all there is to this. God would destroy all the nations. (Like he did with the flood) I think it goes deeper than this..They were enemies of God’s people, that is why my friend. They hated God’s people.
It is prety far down I would think, Amen!!Yes. This is not even a secondary issue. Thirdary?
Expound?Nations have hated Gods people since nations were first created. If this is all there is to this. God would destroy all the nations. (Like he did with the flood) I think it goes deeper than this..
That does the term “sin is complete” means? I think this is the key
It is prety far down I would think, Amen!!
Yet sadly, Penn Ed has been attacked and belittled..(again, I did nto see you do this so not speaking aginst you)
Genesis 15:16Expound?
I assume you mean Penn Ed?? LolI see him as a mature brother in Christ who has been a blessing to me... and many other brothers and sisters on this platform
and an overall really cool guy![]()
To explan a little furtherGenesis 15:16
But in the fourth generation they shall return here, for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete
God did not allow them to have the land, Yet in 400 years. When this iniquity was complete (in the hebrew, the term complete means to be finished, comleted, brought to its conclusion.) God said ok, you are free to go in, But when you go, Kill everything, the animals, the kids, the babies the people.
I believe the flood was pronounced for the same reason,,
What reason woudl that be, what does it mean, the iniquity has been completed.
He wanted to make certain you didn't mean me. That would be a no-no if you wish to retain his favor.yes
whoops
my bad
"Attack" is such an over used word on this site,
Attacks come in various ways. They do not always have to be violent. I can attack you merely by attacking your character or belittling you.. For most people this does not do anything. But for some, this can tear them down and affexts them as if they were violently attacked.It should indeed be reserved for situations like that vicious devastating attack I unleash upon you...
I'm still wondering if you will ever be the same...![]()
One can disagree without calling people names, or making fun of them. Or making yourself look like you are so much better than them (Ie, I do not have to answer your question)
People disagree all the time without doing these things.
Yet it amazes me that people still think this is ok. And want to write it off as nothing.
Attacks come in various ways. They do not always have to be violent. I can attack you merely by attacking your character or belittling you.. For most people this does not do anything. But for some, this can tear them down and affexts them as if they were violently attacked.
Either way, A child of God should not attack another child of God for any reason.
I have done this myself. Thats why I know what it looks like. It makes me sick to think of how I used to treat people all because they disagreed with me.very true bro... I know especially in the past I was veeery guilty of this pretty often....
i will say i havent at all felt attacked since i started posting again
I've not witnessed you attack or belittle others, but have witnessed your friend do it on multiple occasions and recently.very true bro... I know especially in the past I was veeery guilty of this pretty often....
i will say i havent at all felt attacked since i started posting again