If you think that I only take one verse to come to a conclusion on any given biblical concept, you need to lay off the juice!!
Why not address the post and instead say this my friend?
If you think that I only take one verse to come to a conclusion on any given biblical concept, you need to lay off the juice!!
I'll just reply to this then put you back on ignore.
So to whatever question you have in mind I will say AGAIN that LOVE IS THE ANSWER because GOD IS LOVE and so He has to be the TRUTH.
I noticed that when you and your OSAS group quote scriptures, you do not include verses that would not fit your doctrine such as in 1 Corinthians 13 where you ignore or skip verse 2 and the same with Romans 3:31 etc.
Jesus clearly said,
...He replied, “Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you hypocrites; as it is written: “‘These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. They worship me in vain; their teachings are but rules taught by men.’ You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to the traditions of men.” And he said to them: “You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your own traditions! For Moses said, ‘Honor your father and your mother,’ and, ‘Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.’ But you say that if a man says to his father or mother: ‘Whatever help you might otherwise have received from me is Corban’ (that is, a gift devoted to God), then you no longer let him do anything for his father or mother. Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down. And you do many things like that.” Mark 7:6-13
I do not alter nor reject any scripture like you and your group do, and regarding losing salvation, I believe that Ananias and Saphira is a good example along with those in the book of Jude. Jesus even said to the Church in Sardis that He has not found their deeds complete in the sight of God and told them to repent and OBEY what they heard and received or else He will come like a thief and we know what He meant about it.
The parables and the warnings about false prophets and teachers and deceivers would also be good examples of God's righteous JUDGMENT in regards to salvation on both believers and unbelievers.
..Now all has been heard; here is the conclusion of the matter: Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. For God will bring every deed into judgment, including every hidden thing, whether it is good or evil. Ecclesiastes 12:13-14
Appropriated your "boom" above to a correct description.![]()
Why not address the post and instead say this my friend?
Here is your problem my friend...you are taking one verse from the whole and extrapolating it. I can do that and come up with some of the worst doctrine(s) out there. But you can not take a verse and extrapolate it and consider that to be solid hermeneutics.
.
Keep studying bro, and if not, get into a good church, and I pray God answers Paul's prayer in you from Ephesians 1:15-23. Read it, not in a hurry and meditate on what Paul is saying and the LORD will give you understanding. Note how Paul says this in 2 Timothy 2:7.Don't act like that wasn't the heaviest punch you've ever felt...![]()
Impossible for him to do.....the very deception he decries about is indeed the very deception that he peddles.....!!
Hi Preacher, doesn't our collective angst here create the perfect storm for change. Your concern and my concern is for the proper "interpretation and application", of scripture. There is so much misapplied scripture going on around here that it creates 'to much theological divisions' among the brotherhood of believers.Appropriated your "boom" above to a correct description.
Yep, I'm relentless for the truth. Reformed and relentless, Jude 1:4.
Still waiting, and will for eternity wait for any anti-Calvinist to use any contextual exegesis to prove their teachings against such as true.
The fact is they cannot contextually and/or exegetically do so.
No, they cannot do so.
There are many books written to give attempt, yet every single Scripture given is taken completely out of context. That is a fact. This is just one fact that has helped me understand the Gospel and the importance of proper interpretation.
The choose yourself into heaven doctrine via free will (while said decisional regeneration is clearly refuted by Scripture) is a new comer doctrine that's been around for about 150 years plus or minus. The Scriptures that refute this decisional salvation are completely rejected as the opponents merely pit another passage, out of context, against them as if it neutralizes the truth. It's actually sad to watch.
The misinterpretations and misapplications of "all" in Scripture via this decisional regeneration doctrine have led to antinomianism, Universalism, FGT, denial and even ridicule of the evidence of conversion, believe-ism, easy-believism, sinners prayer salvation, "ask Jesus in your heart," ridicule of self-examination, presumptive deception, listen here: false assurance, and such a severe hatred for works that any type of works are mocked as a works gospel.
This sort of teaching has also denied Sovereign electing grace as these falsely believe God chose them only because he saw they would choose them, turning the gift of eternal life into a reward. Those who believe and embrace the fact God has elected unconditionally those whom he willed to save are mocked as being "special" because they believe he chooses based on nothing good in man and only according to his purpose, Romans 9:11ff, Ephesians 1:4ff.
Hmmm. Think that over.
They were chosen because God saw them do something good (and/or because out of their own sincere love for God they came to him) yet we're special? That's just absurd and anyone promoting that idea doesn't have much sense. Lastly it has embraced the Romans 9:20 man.
Agreed.Hi Preacher, doesn't our collective angst here create the perfect storm for change. Your concern and my concern is for the proper "interpretation and application", of scripture. There is so much misapplied scripture going on around here that it creates 'to much theological divisions' among the brotherhood of believers.
I am seeing former Christian friendships appear to dissolve before my very eyes and that should not be.
Spiritual Wisdom: Ephesians1:15-23
15) For this reason, ever since I heard about your faith in the Lord Jesus and your love for all the saints, 16) I have not stopped giving thanks for you, remembering you in my prayers 17) and asking that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the glorious Father, may give you a spirit of wisdom and revelation in your knowledge of Him.18) I ask that the eyes of your heart may be enlightened, so that you may know the hope of His calling, the riches of His glorious inheritance in the saints, 19) and the surpassing greatness of His power to us who believe. He displayed this power in the working of His mighty strength, 20) which He exerted in Christ when He raised Him from the dead and seated Him at His right hand in the heavenly realms, 21) far above all rule and authority, power and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age, but also in the one to come. 22) And God put everything under His feet and made Him head over everything for the church, 23) which is His body, the fullness of Him who fills all in all.
Great Awakening
What do you suggest? Im talking about the "balance to be struck between both views" meaning arminians and calvinists I guess?I have issues with both sides of the coin and have always said there is a balance to be struck between both views based upon scripture.....
Keep studying bro, and if not, get into a good church, and I pray God answers Paul's prayer in you from Ephesians 1:15-23. Read it, not in a hurry and meditate on what Paul is saying and the LORD will give you understanding. Note how Paul says this in 2 Timothy 2:7.
Still waiting, and will for eternity wait for any anti-Calvinist to use any contextual exegesis to prove their teachings against such as true.
The fact is they cannot contextually and/or exegetically do so.
No, they cannot do so.
There are many books written to give attempt, yet every single Scripture given is taken completely out of context. That is a fact. This is just one fact that has helped me understand the Gospel and the importance of proper interpretation.
The choose yourself into heaven doctrine via free will (while said decisional regeneration is clearly refuted by Scripture) is a new comer doctrine that's been around for about 150 years plus or minus. The Scriptures that refute this decisional salvation are completely rejected as the opponents merely pit another passage, out of context, against them as if it neutralizes the truth. It's actually sad to watch.
The misinterpretations and misapplications of "all" in Scripture via this decisional regeneration doctrine have led to antinomianism, Universalism, FGT, denial and even ridicule of the evidence of conversion, believe-ism, easy-believism, sinners prayer salvation, "ask Jesus in your heart," ridicule of self-examination, presumptive deception, listen here: false assurance, and such a severe hatred for works that any type of works are mocked as a works gospel.
This sort of teaching has also denied Sovereign electing grace as these falsely believe God chose them only because he saw they would choose them, turning the gift of eternal life into a reward. Those who believe and embrace the fact God has elected unconditionally those whom he willed to save are mocked as being "special" because they believe he chooses based on nothing good in man and only according to his purpose, Romans 9:11ff, Ephesians 1:4ff.
They were chosen because God saw them do something good (and/or because out of their own sincere love for God they came to him) yet we're special? That's just absurd and anyone promoting that idea doesn't have much sense. Lastly it has embraced the Romans 9:20 man.
You can not reconcile them, they are 2 different gospels.What do you suggest? Im talking about the "balance to be struck between both views" meaning arminians and calvinists I guess?
How do we reconcile these? I'd be very interested to know.
Hi Budman, please show proof that Calvinism teaches predestination to hell
If a person is not regenerated, and not given the opportunity to have the ability to be saved, Then by not chosing them to heaven, they are in fact. Chosen or predestined to hell.Hi Budman, please show proof that Calvinism teaches predestination to hell
and that it teaches God will send children to hell, I don't see it.
Your choice of graphics to explain your view of Calvinism is in poor taste don't you think.
![]()
God is all knowing, this includes knowing not only every action and word but the cause for them... not only to us believers but even those who reject our awesome Lord and savior Jesus Christ
He knew our grandchildrens last words before adam was created....
His knowledge in this does not exclude us from having free will, we just can not see the outcome as He can....
His hand is outstreched to all...even though He knows who will reject Him
and they will have no excuse before Him
Who here would believe any of this is untrue? (and why please)