Things to Consider Before Attempting to Correct the King James Bible

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
NayborBear

NayborBear

Banned Serpent Seed Heresy
#461
Dec 6, 2015
2,626
775
113
A deplorable! (so you know, what "state" I'm in!)
#461
Wow!.......I jez "can't understand it!"

It's like people see God as some kind of "nurse-maid." That is only capable of this ALL ACCEPTING, HEALING LOVE! Which He is, to be sure!

A "corrective" love, or "wrath", even, in His attempting to "guide" His children, TO healing, regenerating of one's mind, and being born again of the Spirit?

Is? To put it quite simply? Just does not FIT IN many believer's "definition" of "their" Holy God!

To put it plainly? What one believer may see, as "guiding?" Another believer sees as EVIL!

Unlike as humans, like so many sheeps, enjoy the "strength in numbers", mentality, and so encourage other members of "their herd", to believe and behave like the leaders of the herd do?

God is QUITE capable of "one on one" engagements. When it comes to correcting, and healing of an individual. That is, so long as it doesn't rise above, or go against "THE HERD!" RIGHT?
 
S

Sipsey

Well-known member
#462
Sep 27, 2018
1,502
713
113
#462
NayborBear said:
Wow!.......I jez "can't understand it!"

It's like people see God as some kind of "nurse-maid." That is only capable of this ALL ACCEPTING, HEALING LOVE! Which He is, to be sure!

A "corrective" love, or "wrath", even, in His attempting to "guide" His children, TO healing, regenerating of one's mind, and being born again of the Spirit?

Is? To put it quite simply? Just does not FIT IN many believer's "definition" of "their" Holy God!

To put it plainly? What one believer may see, as "guiding?" Another believer sees as EVIL!

Unlike as humans, like so many sheeps, enjoy the "strength in numbers", mentality, and so encourage other members of "their herd", to believe and behave like the leaders of the herd do?

God is QUITE capable of "one on one" engagements. When it comes to correcting, and healing of an individual. That is, so long as it doesn't rise above, or go against "THE HERD!" RIGHT?
Click to expand...
Maybe we need a new definition of evil?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#463
#463
Sipsey said:
Maybe we need a new definition of evil?
Click to expand...
To me anything not done out of love, or anything done to serve self is evil
Anything done done for the service of others out of love we have been given from God is good.

A parent who disciplines a child does it out of love, A God who disciplines his creation, does he not do it out of love also (even if we disagree with the disciplin?
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#466
Jan 13, 2016
17,162
3,699
113
#466
Locoponydirtman said:
He did preserve his word to us. He did it in the Bible, but not only on the King James, it's in all versions and translations, because his word is not ink on paper or material, it's spirit and truth. A person with no affinity toward God can read any Bible on Earth and not have one word from God. It's when you read these words from God with the holy Spirit that the word is revealed.
Click to expand...
God's words were preserved through writing it down, Scripture. God is not of confusion. The different versions contain different words and different truths. They all can't be considered God's word.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#467
#467
John146 said:
God's words were preserved through writing it down, Scripture. God is not of confusion. The different versions contain different words and different truths. They all can't be considered God's word.
Click to expand...
If this is the case. Then niether can the KJV be considered Gods word. Because it is different also..thus we have no word we can trust.
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#468
Jun 30, 2015
25,602
13,861
113
#468
John146 said:
God's words were preserved through writing it down, Scripture. God is not of confusion. The different versions contain different words and different truths. They all can't be considered God's word.
Click to expand...
Then none of them are.

Your black-and-white perspective simply does not encompass reality. The KJV is not perfect. In your world, that means it is false and is completely useless. In my world, that means it has weaknesses and needs careful consideration and additional resources.

As for different words, your ignorance of other languages greatly hinders your understanding of the challenges of translation. You likely use synonyms daily, yet you can't comprehend how God could use synonyms. Is He so limited?

Since you hold an a priori position that the KJV is correct, it is truly a waste of time debating the matter with you.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#470
Jan 13, 2016
17,162
3,699
113
#470
eternally-gratefull said:
If this is the case. Then niether can the KJV be considered Gods word. Because it is different also..thus we have no word we can trust.
Click to expand...
If God preserved His word in the English language it's one or none. It can't be the KJV and the NASB and the ESV and the NIV and etc...one or none. You say none, we have no bible in the English language that is trustworthy.

Proverbs 14:5 A faithful witness will not lie: but a false witness will utter lies.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#471
Jan 13, 2016
17,162
3,699
113
#471
Dino246 said:
Then none of them are.

Your black-and-white perspective simply does not encompass reality. The KJV is not perfect. In your world, that means it is false and is completely useless. In my world, that means it has weaknesses and needs careful consideration and additional resources.

As for different words, your ignorance of other languages greatly hinders your understanding of the challenges of translation. You likely use synonyms daily, yet you can't comprehend how God could use synonyms. Is He so limited?

Since you hold an a priori position that the KJV is correct, it is truly a waste of time debating the matter with you.
Click to expand...
In your world it means you have the authority to correct as you see fit...
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#473
#473
John146 said:
If God preserved His word in the English language it's one or none. It can't be the KJV and the NASB and the ESV and the NIV and etc...one or none. You say none, we have no bible in the English language that is trustworthy.

Proverbs 14:5 A faithful witness will not lie: but a false witness will utter lies.
Click to expand...
Dude, If God wanted a perfect word in english he would have orrigionally wrote it in english. Not waited 1600 years late.

Your own arguments go against yourself because the same arguments can be used against you

It is sad we are forced to show bad things about a wonderful translation all because people want to idolise it as some perfect thing which it is not..as has been proven 1000 times over since I have been a member of CC
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#474
Jan 13, 2016
17,162
3,699
113
#474
eternally-gratefull said:
Dude, If God wanted a perfect word in english he would have orrigionally wrote it in english. Not waited 1600 years late.
Click to expand...
That again is your opinion. God can speak any language He so chooses. God can have His "originals" translated into any language He so chooses, and for that people who speak that language, it is the holy, pure words of God.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#475
Jan 13, 2016
17,162
3,699
113
#475
eternally-gratefull said:
Dude, If God wanted a perfect word in english he would have orrigionally wrote it in english. Not waited 1600 years late.

Your own arguments go against yourself because the same arguments can be used against you

It is sad we are forced to show bad things about a wonderful translation all because people want to idolise it as some perfect thing which it is not..as has been proven 1000 times over since I have been a member of CC
Click to expand...
And when all else fails...insult, call people idolaters for believing God has preserved His word in the English language.
 
S

Sipsey

Well-known member
#476
Sep 27, 2018
1,502
713
113
#476
There was a KJVO fellow where I worked, great guy, did a lot of evangelism. A friend was talking to him one day about the NIV. He stated that as he was reading the NIV the HS convicted him and he accepted the finished work of Christ, that Jesus was his Lord and Savior; so he asked the KJV guy was he really saved? He didn’t answer, just walked away.
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
#477
#477
Sackcloth-N-Ashes said:
No He does not my friend. The canon of scripture is closed. If people want to hear from God, they must open their bibles.
Click to expand...

while I absolutely believe that the word of God (Bible) is the final authority on everything...that is we do not give personal revelations, dreams, visions or exta-biblical beliefs...God can and does speak to us through His word but also in our minds through His Holy Spirit and sometime, rarely, a person may audibly hear His Voice

now you can go ahead and say none of that is true, but if you do, I will simply admit that for you, it probably is not true

but for most Christians it is true

this has 0 to with the canon of scripture but everything to do with the reality of God who makes Himself personal to those who seek Him

so many do not believe what the word actually says and teaches and believe that God stopped speaking

He speaks everyday in the stillness of our hearts, in nature, through others and ulitmately through His word

I am not even going to bother to respond to negative comments regarding this post. I am not the one you disregard, but rather God
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#478
#478
John146 said:
That again is your opinion. God can speak any language He so chooses. God can have His "originals" translated into any language He so chooses, and for that people who speak that language, it is the holy, pure words of God.
Click to expand...
That again is your opinion.

If God is going to do it for one (english) he would do it for all.

The fact he did not, added to all th eother proofs you have been given by so many people Support our opinion.

You my friend, Have just your opinion
 
S

Sipsey

Well-known member
#479
Sep 27, 2018
1,502
713
113
#479
Paul stated that we need to be careful, that we may be entertaining angels unawares. If that was true then is it true now? I have talked to someone that had two (angels) walk down his hallway into his bedroom and set on his bed, his wife saw them walk down the hall. One had a scroll and prophesied. It simply verified Scripture but it was a life changing moment for him. I don’t limit Gods intervention in our lives to simply reading. Though not as dramatic as my friend God has often came close in my life and others I know. He never goes against His written Word, He simply confirms it, but in a most dramatic fashion. And I’m not Pentecostal.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#480
Jan 13, 2016
17,162
3,699
113
#480
eternally-gratefull said:
That again is your opinion.

If God is going to do it for one (english) he would do it for all.

The fact he did not, added to all th eother proofs you have been given by so many people Support our opinion.

You my friend, Have just your opinion
Click to expand...
Why? Were the "originals" in every language?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.