FLAT EARTH

[cv5]

1. you're confessing ignorance and lack of comprehension, then
2. by (1) you affirm that (2) is heresay
3. Ecclesiastes 3:11 describes what is, so v.15's description of when what is, is, is dependent on v.11

1) Lol. Nope. Im confessing THEIR ignorance and lack of comprehension.
2) On the contrary, both fall into the same category as (1).
3) Maybe. But I perceive that v.15 stands on its own with no dependencies required.

 

[posthuman]

1) Lol. Nope. Im confessing THEIR ignorance and lack of comprehension.
2) On the contrary, both fall into the same category as (1).
3) Maybe. But I perceive that v.15 stands on its own with no dependencies required.

1. you said you haven't read them and you think they're mindless. that's ignorance and lack of comprehension. so you don't comprehend logic, either?
2. if you haven't read them, and what little you read you didn't understand, any comment you have about their content is hearsay. supporting hypothesis (1), you don't comprehend the logic.
3. you are saying "what is" needs no description, tho v. 15 also describes what is. further corroborating hypothesis (1)
   1. if what is has no attributes what is cannot be. you agree with Bohr, though you imply you didn't. more corroborating observational evidence of (1)

 

[cv5]

1. you said you haven't read them and you think they're mindless. that's ignorance and lack of comprehension. so you don't comprehend logic, either?
2. if you haven't read them, and what little you read you didn't understand, any comment you have about their content is hearsay. supporting hypothesis (1), you don't comprehend the logic.
3. you are saying "what is" needs no description, tho v. 15 also describes what is. further corroborating hypothesis (1)
   1. if what is has no attributes what is cannot be. you agree with Bohr, though you imply you didn't. more corroborating observational evidence of (1)

I did not say that I did not read what they wrote. I said that I stalled and did not read ALL of what they wrote, considering it to be more of the same incomplete (and ultimately inept) natural philosophy, of which there seems to be a boundless supply.

The bottom line is that Bohr, Einstein and the rest resorted to patently unscientific figments of their imagination to support their theories, which themselves do not describe reality and they state this quite clearly many times. Virtual photons or other unreal particles and mythical abstractions are not genuine by their own admission. Mystical dualities are likewise absurd. The Schrodinger's cat rubbish is absurd.

 

[posthuman]

Virtual photons or other unreal particles and mythical abstractions are not genuine by their own admission. Mystical dualities are likewise absurd.

so you agree with Einstein

The Schrodinger's cat rubbish is absurd.

did you know Schrodinger intended it as rubbish? he came up with that example to demonstrate how absurd the Copenhagen interpretation is. so you agree with him, too.

 

[J70x7]

 

[cv5]

so you agree with Einstein



did you know Schrodinger intended it as rubbish? he came up with that example to demonstrate how absurd the Copenhagen interpretation is. so you agree with him, too.

I disagree with all of them, their descriptions, their theories, and their explanations.
I also disagree with evolutionists, most geologists, plate tectonics, most paleontologists and so on and so forth. Come to think of it, I disagree with almost everybody who is not Christian.

BTW, there is compelling evidence that "gravity" was significantly less in the not too distant past....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentavis

Megafauna of the scale that once lived is quite impossible today.

Just a reminder, Christ was "creating" matter (food, wine), healing on the fly day in and day out, defying "gravity" and so on and so forth with the greatest of ease and effortlessly, violating all supposed natural laws. This power and matter simply entering our "physical dimension" from the spiritual dimension at His whim. Sounds an awful lot like space and counterspace to me.

 

[cv5]

so you agree with Einstein



did you know Schrodinger intended it as rubbish? he came up with that example to demonstrate how absurd the Copenhagen interpretation is. so you agree with him, too.

"I awoke, only to see the rest of the world is still asleep" - Leonardo da Vinci

 

[Dude653]

Have you even seriously considered looking into it? Unbiased and wholeheartedly?

If not, then you cannot talk down on it because then it is you that ends up looking like a fool.

you could tell me the Loch Ness monster works at Walmart but I'm not going to look into it

 

[FrankBlack]

The Church needs to be talking more about Flat Earth, especially since the Bible describes the earth as flat and circular, with the firmament dome over it. I'm currently reading a conspiracy thriller called The Verticon File, by Christian author Brian Weimer. It's a conspiracy thriller that centers around the NASA deception and the truth of flat earth. I encourage everyone to check it out. As I truther and even a bit of a conspiracy theorist (although I hate labels), I've been learning that mainstream news and entertainment usually serves to program and indoctrinate the population into believing lies. If you believe lies, then you will live according to them. We should be waking people up to the truth of FE, which I believe is an awakening and a movement of God.

 

[posthuman]

Just a reminder, Christ was "creating" matter (food, wine), healing on the fly day in and day out, defying "gravity" and so on and so forth with the greatest of ease and effortlessly, violating all supposed natural laws. This power and matter simply entering our "physical dimension" from the spiritual dimension at His whim. Sounds an awful lot like space and counterspace to me.

sounds more like a quantum infinite improbability drive, tbh.
however tuned to avoid the random appearance of whales in stratospheres.

but if you believe He was subject to natural law and these things were clever manipulations of matter, not sovereign power over all that exists, haven't you stripped Him of His deity and called Him a magician rather than a miracle worker?

 

[cv5]

sounds more like a quantum infinite improbability drive, tbh.
however tuned to avoid the random appearance of whales in stratospheres.

but if you believe He was subject to natural law and these things were clever manipulations of matter, not sovereign power over all that exists, haven't you stripped Him of His deity and called Him a magician rather than a miracle worker?

You have a consistent habit of putting words in my mouth. Very consistent. No, Jesus was and is Lord of creation without restrictions or limitations other than those Self imposed.

 

[Subhumanoidal]

The Church needs to be talking more about Flat Earth, especially since the Bible describes the earth as flat and circular, with the firmament dome over it. I'm currently reading a conspiracy thriller called The Verticon File, by Christian author Brian Weimer. It's a conspiracy thriller that centers around the NASA deception and the truth of flat earth. I encourage everyone to check it out. As I truther and even a bit of a conspiracy theorist (although I hate labels), I've been learning that mainstream news and entertainment usually serves to program and indoctrinate the population into believing lies. If you believe lies, then you will live according to them. We should be waking people up to the truth of FE, which I believe is an awakening and a movement of God.

And here I thought the church should be A) focusing on our personal walks B) being witnesses
I didn't realize those were distractions from issues of real importance, like the shape of the earth. Doh!

 

[J70x7]

And here I thought the church should be A) focusing on our personal walks B) being witnesses
I didn't realize those were distractions from issues of real importance, like the shape of the earth. Doh!

If people choose not to believe the FLAT HORIZONTAL HORIZON THEY CAN SEE, how can we expect these same people to choose to believe in God they can not see?

 

[Jennie-Mae]

If people choose not to believe the FLAT HORIZONTAL HORIZON THEY CAN SEE, how can we expect these same people to choose to believe in God they can not see?

There seems to be a logical fallacy present in this statement.

What you are really saying is that people that are not flat earthers most likely are not Christians.

Would you please tell me how you arrived at that conclusion?

 

[Subhumanoidal]

This guy is either the best troll ever on CC or is off his meds.

 

[J70x7]

 

[J70x7]

 

[J70x7]

 

[Jennie-Mae]

View attachment 191886

So the sun is pulling back?

That zoom up thing will sure come in handy when vessels are lost at sea. Wonder why nobody’s thought about that before. This is a game changer. An egg of Columbus, a Copernican Revolution...it’s like the invention of the wheel reinvented.

And you were the only one seeing it?

Wow.

 

[Dino246]

View attachment 191886