lol,Like I said back when I was speaking of the Apostolic fathers and their deciples not many see it like that in 2018. They said in several letters in the first 200-300 years "let them.." boast/prove their Apostolic line as could Polycarp from John and Clement of Rome from Peter ect....
I cant see why they would not been biblicaly associated(Barnabas,1Clement,Shepard of Hermas) seeing all three are named in the bible but they are not regarded as such. There must have been the same argument after about 300ad because they mentioned Polycarp,Clement ect. as traceable back to Apostles as if the provable original thinking was getting lost.
I cant see why they would not been biblicaly associated(Barnabas,1Clement,Shepard of Hermas) seeing all three are named in the bible but they are not regarded as such. There must have been the same argument after about 300ad because they mentioned Polycarp,Clement ect. as traceable back to Apostles as if the provable original thinking was getting lost.
Why do I say this?
Dan 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.
Luke 21:22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.
And we can most likely include Paul's testimony:
1 Cor 13:8 Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.
Therefore my contention is that our understanding of the bibles prophetic messages and fulfillment must be limited to the 1st century.
- 1
- Show all