BAM!! Warning you might need your seatbelts.
- Thread starter CharliRenee
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I'm not sure if this fits the thread but I hope it does.
If we have love we just don't need to have anything else...
If we don't have it, it doesn't matter much what else we have.
That love needs to come from the depths of the soul . When
we encounter a person, should we first think that is a woman
or a man or the looks good or bad. Would it not be not be more
Christ like if our first thought is "I love you regardless of gender,
of ethnicity, of age or any other matter of labelling. Does that
not lead to massogeny, discrimination or or any other label. Can
we not trust in our hearts what Jesus said "Love one another as
I love you." In other words we don't first analyse, judge or visuals
someone to determine our next step. Should it not be as Jesus
said "you love me because I loved you first. Maybe it's good to try
that. If I said "I love you", would you call me a liberal .
If we have love we just don't need to have anything else...
If we don't have it, it doesn't matter much what else we have.
That love needs to come from the depths of the soul . When
we encounter a person, should we first think that is a woman
or a man or the looks good or bad. Would it not be not be more
Christ like if our first thought is "I love you regardless of gender,
of ethnicity, of age or any other matter of labelling. Does that
not lead to massogeny, discrimination or or any other label. Can
we not trust in our hearts what Jesus said "Love one another as
I love you." In other words we don't first analyse, judge or visuals
someone to determine our next step. Should it not be as Jesus
said "you love me because I loved you first. Maybe it's good to try
that. If I said "I love you", would you call me a liberal .
-
2
- Show all
Love covers a multitude of sins. God is Love.
Love is doing and not siimply lip service.
Yes,s I believe if we truly Love, we are and do all by the nature given us.
As for the last part of your post, immediately It thing of
the teaching, "judge not by appearance but with right judgment."Ç
Yes, ysou are on top of it all, God bless you always.
Love is doing and not siimply lip service.
Yes,s I believe if we truly Love, we are and do all by the nature given us.
As for the last part of your post, immediately It thing of
the teaching, "judge not by appearance but with right judgment."Ç
Yes, ysou are on top of it all, God bless you always.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
OK, I'm going to get nasty here:
- Wait? Someone married her? On PURPOSE?????
- He literally destroyed the little Marxist! (and I enjoyed it!)
- It goes to show that when a person studies they dismantle false ideologies.
- Her blood pressure went sky high, you could tell by her breathing when he refuted her!
The same goes for Biblical doctrine, those who study readily dismantle false doctrines and are generally loathed by others because they actually know what they're talking about and they go against their popular dogma. Jude 1:3. But the problem is, just as with her, when thoroughly refuted they will not concede. LOL!!!!!!!!!
Carry on!
- Wait? Someone married her? On PURPOSE?????
- He literally destroyed the little Marxist! (and I enjoyed it!)
- It goes to show that when a person studies they dismantle false ideologies.
- Her blood pressure went sky high, you could tell by her breathing when he refuted her!
The same goes for Biblical doctrine, those who study readily dismantle false doctrines and are generally loathed by others because they actually know what they're talking about and they go against their popular dogma. Jude 1:3. But the problem is, just as with her, when thoroughly refuted they will not concede. LOL!!!!!!!!!
Carry on!
-
1
- Show all
Jordan is a clinical psychologist, a professor of psychology @ U of Toronto and, I love this title, a public intellectual. And he claims he's a cultural warrior, whatever he thinks that is.
In reality he's a pseudo-intellectual.
How dangerous is Jordan B Peterson, the rightwing professor who 'hit a hornets' nest'?
Since his confrontation with Cathy Newman, the Canadian academic’s book has become a bestseller. But his arguments are riddled with ‘pseudo-facts’ and conspiracy theories
In reality he's a pseudo-intellectual.
How dangerous is Jordan B Peterson, the rightwing professor who 'hit a hornets' nest'?
Since his confrontation with Cathy Newman, the Canadian academic’s book has become a bestseller. But his arguments are riddled with ‘pseudo-facts’ and conspiracy theories
-
1
- Show all
I am not a fan of atheist Sam Harris. He considers himself an intellectual as well and yet as an atheist he claims there is no proof of God, or no evidence something called "God" can exist. Yet, he dedicates his career to publishing books attacking something he first states isn't there.
But he's an intellectual.
God doesn't exist, and I'll publish nearly half dozen books to say more about why God isn't there.
I'm an intellectual. Buy my books! God doesn't exist! I can write at least one book and prove a negative.
Here is a short encounter Sam had with Jordan during their London England exchange. They've met before this.
This is the full debate:
You could make this stuff up. But then there's the expense of script writers, producers, finding a studio that will actually make the thing. And then selling tickets to the comedy of pseudo's.
Seriously. These two should go on the road together.....oh, wait.
But he's an intellectual.
God doesn't exist, and I'll publish nearly half dozen books to say more about why God isn't there.
I'm an intellectual.
Buy my books! God doesn't exist! I can write at least one book and prove a negative. Here is a short encounter Sam had with Jordan during their London England exchange. They've met before this.
This is the full debate:
You could make this stuff up. But then there's the expense of script writers, producers, finding a studio that will actually make the thing. And then selling tickets to the comedy of pseudo's.
Seriously. These two should go on the road together.....oh, wait.
-
1
- Show all
I am not a fan of atheist Sam Harris. He considers himself an intellectual as well and yet as an atheist he claims there is no proof of God, or no evidence something called "God" can exist. Yet, he dedicates his career to publishing books attacking something he first states isn't there.
But he's an intellectual.
God doesn't exist, and I'll publish nearly half dozen books to say more about why God isn't there.
I'm an intellectual. Buy my books! God doesn't exist! I can write at least one book and prove a negative.
Here is a short encounter Sam had with Jordan during their London England exchange. They've met before this.
This is the full debate:
You could make this stuff up. But then there's the expense of script writers, producers, finding a studio that will actually make the thing. And then selling tickets to the comedy of pseudo's.
Seriously. These two should go on the road together.....oh, wait.
But he's an intellectual.
God doesn't exist, and I'll publish nearly half dozen books to say more about why God isn't there.
I'm an intellectual.
Buy my books! God doesn't exist! I can write at least one book and prove a negative.Here is a short encounter Sam had with Jordan during their London England exchange. They've met before this.
This is the full debate:
You could make this stuff up. But then there's the expense of script writers, producers, finding a studio that will actually make the thing. And then selling tickets to the comedy of pseudo's.
Seriously. These two should go on the road together.....oh, wait.
If you watch the full video of Harris and Peterson in their London debate I think you'll find it encapsulates how deficient Harris actually is in his arguments against the existence of any supreme being or the source behind inspired texts.
Not to give away too much but Harris at the 15:00 mark wherein he states he's not discounting the possibility of....
And what he says after that, not giving it away here , makes any criticism he ever again makes against inspired texts source invalid. And he doesn't realize this apparently, as it also makes invalid his arguments against the likelihood of the existence of a supreme being, or , God. And simply because of those very simple words in that 15:00 mark. I'm not discounting the possibility of....
Not to give away too much but Harris at the 15:00 mark wherein he states he's not discounting the possibility of....
And what he says after that, not giving it away here , makes any criticism he ever again makes against inspired texts source invalid. And he doesn't realize this apparently, as it also makes invalid his arguments against the likelihood of the existence of a supreme being, or , God. And simply because of those very simple words in that 15:00 mark. I'm not discounting the possibility of....
-
1
- Show all