Jesus didn't come to fulfill the law (through obedience to it),
Sorry but that is incorrect...
Jesus didn't come to fulfill the law (through obedience to it),
My goodness. What can I say
There is a distinction, you are right.I'm not sure why the discussion remains centered on the Mosaic law when it is the 'law of the Lord' is the subject of Psalm 119. That is the Word of God. The context throughout the chapter is on how much David loves 'Thy Word.'
That is a non sequitur.If a God changes in either nature or form then we know one thing, that God is not eternal.
There is a distinction, you are right.
I wonder if you know what it is?
AmenI just think moral law, and the way we were created and designed, natural law, make sense. They may not save us if we strive to earn our salvation but they can bless us in our personal relationship with regards to our communion with the spirit. I think we are saved by grace, 100%, not by works. I think we best believe in Him, though, with all our HEARTS, and that belief means make sure we love, in action, words, and thought, Him and others, as we are called to. If we do, we will fulfill the law. So it is a win win situation, if we truly (rootedly) believe. The good news is His work is our faith, wow, that is empowering and comforting. We can rest, in Him...He has us.
2 Corinthians 3:6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.Well, the Law of Moses was/is temporary . . . it was/is active until it fulfills it's role as a schoolmaster, depositing the lost sinner at the Cross of Christ.
The Law of the Lord, on the other hand, is eternal . . . "For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven" (Psalms 119:89).
That is a non sequitur.
The Law of the Lord, on the other hand, is eternal . . . "For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven" (Psalms 119:89).
The Lord is a WHO, His Word is a WHAT . . .Since it is written that the LORD only hath immortality,
Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen. 1 Tim 6:16
being the only begotten of the eternal God, then how could the law of truth be eternal if the laws of nature only came into existence when the universe was created.
[/QUOTE]If a God changes in either nature or form then we know one thing, that God is not eternal. And if not eternal, it could not be the one true eternal God.
Thus, if the first covenant was not eternal then neither would be a second covenant, for if the first covenant waxed old then the second covenant was dead before it was written seeing that anything which is not eternal will not always exist, since the eternal having alway existed, does not change, and therefore will always exist.
So it doesn't surprise me this fact infuriates some religious people since it is written that men loved lies more than the truth. Of course I could be wrong so if you can identify anything in this universe which has always existed then I would be more than interested in your correction of my understanding the scriptures.
Thanks for teaching me a new fun word. May you continue, please!!!That is a non sequitur.
What doesn't logically follow is saying (as you did) that if God can change in either nature or form, He cannot be eternal. We do not understand, nor can our finite minds grasp, infinity or eternality well enough to be able to define them to the extent that we can say: if something is eternal it cannot ______. <~ Insert just about any word thereIf the eternal has no beginning of existence then it cannot change in either nature or form since its nature and form are eternal. Therefore if any man says that is he is the eternal God, having changed in nature and form then we know that man is not the eternal God because the eternal does not change in nature or form.
If the Gospel be hid it is hid to them who are lost. To say it doesn't logically follow that the eternal does not change in either nature of form is to say that every living thing is eternal.
So are you claiming that all living things are eternal?
Prove it.Sorry but that is incorrect...
Jesus told the Pharisees (and demonstrated in other ways) that their understanding of the law was faulty on quite a few points, including what was and what was not permissible to do on the Sabbath. That they sought to kill Him for breaking the Sabbath law as they understood it does not equate to Jesus breaking the Sabbath God instituted.Prove it.
What do you make of this?
John 5:18
For this reason they tried all the more to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.
John 9:16
Some of the Pharisees said, “This man is not from God, for he does not keep the Sabbath.” But others asked, “How can a sinner perform such signs?” So they were divided.
Thanks for your reply.Jesus told the Pharisees (and demonstrated in other ways) that their understanding of the law was faulty on quite a few points, including what was and what was not permissible to do on the Sabbath. That they sought to kill Him for breaking the Sabbath law as they understood it does not equate to Jesus breaking the Sabbath God instituted.
Do you really wish to say that Jesus broke the law? You gut the gospel if you do so, for it would make Him a sinner and an unacceptable sacrifice as the Lamb of God to pay the sin debt of humanity.
The earth as God created it was 4,000 years old when Jesus was given to us, and God made His plan for our salvation as soon as Eve ate the apple and sin entered the world. All the people did not die eternally for those 4,000 years, but they were saved through innocent blood. Jesus was from the beginning. We are told in Matthew that the saints, including Moses, was alive after the cross. The Father gives us salvation through the blood of Jesus. Always has.Jesus did not remove the Law..
Jesus removed the curse that was attached to the Law....