Jesus again and again declared it a evil generation (no faith) as in natural man that does seek after a signa and wonders gospel ."Charismatics"
You are confused, just as you were a couple of years ago when we discussed this. God is not the author of your confusion.
I think you are still making a logical error. Jesus said, 'An evil and adulterous generation seeketh a sign.'
Jesus also said, "If ye then being evil know how to give good gifts unto your children...' If i were to use your 'logic', I would conclude that parents who knew how to give good things to their children were evil for doing so.
A wicked and adutlerous generation sought a sign. That does not mean anyone who seeks signs and wonders is evil or adulterous. A wicked and adulterous generation drinks water. Does that prove that anyone who drinks water is evil and adulterous? I believe your error is called the logical error of affirming the consequent.
The apostles asked Jesus for a sign in Matthew 24. Jesus gave them the sign of His Coming. We do not read where he rebuked for being evil or adulterous the disciples for asking that. The apostles in Acts 4 prayed for God to stretch forth His hand to heal and to do signs and wonders for the sake of Jesus. We do not see God rebuking them from heaven. We do see in the pages of Acts that what they prayed for took place. We also see from Acts 4 that the apostles Jesus sent into the world to teach the nations thought that it was okay to ask God to do signs and wonders.
Acts also shows us the value of signs and wonders in evangelism. So do the Gospels. Jesus said, "Except ye see signs and wonders, ye shall not believe" before healing the individual the man asked Him to heal. Jesus did signs and wonders. They weren't evil. Jesus said someone who did a miracle/sign in His name would not straightway speak against Him.
Jesus commanded the apostles to heal, cleanse lepers, and to raise the dead. Mark 16 includes speaking with new tongues and laying hands on the sick and their recovering among the signs that follow them that believe. The apostles did signs and wonders, and many believed. When Philip did signs and wonders, the people paid careful attention to what he said. After watching Paul declare Elymas temporarily blind, Sergius Paulus believed. Paul encourages believers to minister to one another with their spiritual gifts and lists words of wisdom, words of knowledge, prophecy, healings, the working of miracles, tongues, and interpretation among the gifts members of the body exercise to edify one another.
You seriously need to submit to the authority of scripture on this matter. Twisting the interpretation of one passage to contradict the others is not the way to interpret the Bible. I have explained this to you before. I do hope that this veil over your mind which keeps you from being able to understand and comprehend the word of God on this issue is lifted, and you drop these weird interpretations of yours.
He is speaking directly to the Jew who refused to walk by faith as it is written . It has nothing to do with Assyrian. But everything to do with "charismatics' Those who seek after a sign before they will believe (they must walk by sight)
You don't even stick with your own theory. What happened to your conclusion that it was about Jews?
Of course it has to do with Assyria. Read the book of Isaiah! Read the Old Testament. Assyria came in and took over Israel, marching them away. The Assyrians spoke Hebrew or other languages.
You should also look at how the New Testament uses Old Testament prophecy and applies it. 'Out of Egypt have I called my Son', had an application for Israel, led by Ephraim, at that time.
He limits the sign of rebellion directly to Hebrew the language that he spoke to the Jew with.
Early in this section, in chapter 12, he says they used to worship idols.