J
jaybird88
Guest
AND the God-Ghost?
i dont remember Jesus teaching on a seat for the Spirit.
AND the God-Ghost?
You don't have the authority to speak to how the Disciples saw it. Jesus himself said that he and the father are one.
Putting any other spin on it is man's imagination.Not God's word.
Maybe that's the problem. You think common sense comprehends God's breath. That's why you think God's words don't add up when speaking of this particular topic. Which I won't go further into due to the rules.but i do have enough common sense to read scripture and see it does not add up.
Maybe that's the problem. You think common sense comprehends God's breath. That's why you think God's words don't add up when speaking of this particular topic. Which I won't go further into due to the rules.
You are DISBELIEVING what He said: Before Abraham was I AM.Let me get this STRAIGHT; I 'ATTACK' Jesus by BELIEVING WHAT HE SAID?????
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More like Ice Cream melted by Steam.
God SENT His son- 1/3 God did NOT 'become' a son when born a man.
God gave us and the Jews MANY references that EASILY help us to understand Jesus DID have a beginning/creation/birth, when saying he is His SON, His only-begotten, the firstborn of all creation, and the beginning of all His creation.
The clergy tries to brush all those away saying they are just symbolic titles.
the church has not always accepted this, the church has been arguing this for 1700 years. before 300 (about) you will not find this argument anywhere, i wonder why???
so "SON OF" means the exact same thing as the Most High? Adam, angels, psalm 82, all these beings are the Father? how many Fathers are there? this is the same Father that says He is one?
i just dont get how you guys can ignore "son of", you act as if its not there at all. its not the same thing.
Since I never said any of that, I'm out.so we should throw our common sense out the window and just be lead by whatever we are told?
scripture adds up just fine, what does not add up is the doctrine.
Wrong! Read Saint Paul's letters. It is clear that he thought about Jesus Christ as God.
We don't ignore "son of"; it is actually quite important! If you read carefully Saint Paul's writings, you'll notice that (after the resurrection of Christ), you can no longer refer to the Most High without including the Son and the Holy Spirit.
Jesus is my savior, my only true way to God the Father and His Kingdom. But is Jesus God, or is He Gods Son whom will come gather us children to live in Gods Kingdom with Jesus and God?
Jesus is my savior, my only true way to God the Father and His Kingdom. But is Jesus God, or is He Gods Son whom will come gather us children to live in Gods Kingdom with Jesus and God?
Ok, this is a subject that is super tricky. Why? Because this is at the deep end of the pool when it comes to understanding more than just the "milk and bones" of the Bible.
1. In simple, if you are a strong believer in Yeshua, you fight your flesh and you love G-d and Yeshua, then honestly, don't sweat it. Keep working out yourself and keep loving others and pushing for truth!
2. I believe Ariel Cohen Alloro (an Orthodox Rabbi who believes in Yeshua) hold the best answer because of this a deep Kabbalistic root.
3. In short, G-d is One. (Sh'ma Yisrael Adonoy Elokeinu, Adonoy Echad). What does One mean? G-d is everywhere and in everything. He is not limited to a body, nor can He be only confined to one location. All that we know of Him, is little a grain of sand when it comes to the infinite wisdom of G-d. Now, if G-d is everything that like Psalms 82:6 and John 10:30 state, we can all be "Elokim" (not H-Shem the 4 letter Tetragrammaton). Meaning, we all have a part of G-d in us and EVERYTHING on earth has a part of G-d in it (simply speaking that is). So who declared or commanded anywhere that G-d is confined to "3 entities"? You know that Israel is called One with G-d? Moshe was called Elokim, angels are called Elokim, Avraham was One with G-d and even Joshua bowed down to the angel that G-d placed His NAME upon. So who or what limited G-d to these 3 entities? To limit G-d, destroys the power of G-d. The whole book of Deuteronomy which is part of the Torah is written in the tense of Moshe, not G-d. Because being "one with G-d" means that you are righteous enough, that G-d can use YOU as a vessel to "dwell" (partially in). That is why the body is called "The Holy Temple". You think G-d only dwelt in the Temple when there was one? So what does it mean to enter the "Holy of Holies"?
4. But......(lol I hate this part)....there is something powerful beyond measure with Yeshua NO DOUBT. Exodus 23:20 states that there will be an "Angel" that G-d would place his name on and Joshua (Joshua 5:14) bows to it. To bear G-d's name does not mean to BE G-d, but you emulate exactly what it means to be like Him (just like how Moshe's face radiated with G-d's presence), however, Yeshua is at an EVEN HIGHER LEVEL.
For G-d was in a bush speaking to G-d, so does that mean G-d is a bush because G-d and the bush became One? Or is G-d a cloud because He was the Clouds of Glory? (In fact nature holds a high level of spirituality because it comes from G-d more "directly").
This could go on, but I hope this sparks a thought. Remember, this doesn't hold much value, the works and love we express to all souls weigh much more than the argument of the Trinity....and if it makes people sleep better at night....to be honest...I don't argue it. No 2 people should ever fight about this because it is very complicated to understand. We have much greater things at hand.
However, when it comes to Jews...this can be a big road blocker and I understand why. The best argument, is Yeshua's own usage of Psalms 82:6 in John 10:30. To be called Elokim/G-d means a lot, but it does not make it the 4 letter Tetragrammaton. Yeshua never called Himself that name. But can I worship Yeshua like Joshua worshiped the Angel with G-d's 4 Letter Name on it? Yes!
Confusing eh?
Actually the angel of the Lord you referenced at Joshua 5:14 is none other than the preincarnate Jesus Christ who appeared to Joshua in the form of a man The same is true when you referenced Exodus chapter 3 where He also appeared as a man. And yes, Jesus Christ did refer to Himself as God not only in the Old Testament but in the New Testament as well. Read closely starting at John 10:30 and find out why He quoted Psalm 82:6. Of course you are right that the "gods" who are men are not really God.
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
Hey Bluto! Ah you speak well! Yes I too believe that Yeshua was that angel. There is much depth to this and even when I present this more to Jews....it causes some fun. It is a tricky and difficult subject and there is much for me to learn on it. If you ever study Ramban, there is a hefty handful understand of this "Angel" and I believe Ramban as a Jew believed in Yeshua based on how he describes this Angel. (L"M)
Hey Bluto. Ah this subject is way too heavy for me. I well let Sefaria give you a glimpse. I studied it last year for a while and it really gave me "ammo" when it came to understanding how H-Shem uses His name. As I study Kabbalah here and there and Ariel Cohen Alloro explains it obviously 100x better, I am understanding more of the complexity of G-d, humanity and the Mashiach. I'll send you a couple links to begin:
a) https://www.sefaria.org/Exodus.23.20?lang=bi&with=Ramban&lang2=en (Sefaria is access to almost most main Jewish sources). Click on any verse and open a world of explanation. If you ever study the Talmud, let me know I can help you along.
b)(I fear to give this, but he is one of literally a couple of main Rabbi's who exposed themselves to believe in Yeshua. You can learn endlessly with Ariel but it is at a higher level of understanding - Kabbalah) His Rabbi who is one of the biggest Rabbi's in the World, Rav Ginsburgh is AMAZING. You may understand him better.
I did look up Ramban and as soon as I saw the word "Kabalah" it turned me off. Orthodox Jews will have nothing to do with this "mysticism" and occult knowledge trying to gain greater levels of being connected to God. But I will check them out to see how they reconcile their belief system with the true Yeshua of the Old Testament. I'll get back to you.
IN THE ANGEL OF THE LORD,
bluto
Actually the angel of the Lord you referenced at Joshua 5:14 is none other than the preincarnate Jesus Christ who appeared to Joshua in the form of a man The same is true when you referenced Exodus chapter 3 where He also appeared as a man. And yes, Jesus Christ did refer to Himself as God not only in the Old Testament but in the New Testament as well. Read closely starting at John 10:30 and find out why He quoted Psalm 82:6. Of course you are right that the "gods" who are men are not really God.
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto