Secession is the only hope for peace in USA.
- Thread starter Quantrill
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
The question is 'do you really want to see a real Civil War?' What you call the 'civil war' was really a 'war between the states'. What you are going to see is a real civil war if some sort of secession is not allowed.
The truth is the yankees have never gotten over the last one. Yall are the ones that keep bringing it up. Not us. Get your facts straight.
Quantrill
The truth is the yankees have never gotten over the last one. Yall are the ones that keep bringing it up. Not us. Get your facts straight.
Quantrill
What an ignorant post. See again post (#33). The Democratic party today is not what it was in 1861. Neither is the Republican party.
I have clearly told you that I would vote Republican and that I can see no way a Christian can vote democrat.
If I lived in 1861 I would definitely vote democrat. But not now.
So, buy yourself a 101 history book and learn how these things have come to be. Put the doughnut and coffee down and spend a little time studying.
Your obvious effort at trying to identify me with the liberal democrat party of today, is infantile.
Quantrill
I have clearly told you that I would vote Republican and that I can see no way a Christian can vote democrat.
If I lived in 1861 I would definitely vote democrat. But not now.
So, buy yourself a 101 history book and learn how these things have come to be. Put the doughnut and coffee down and spend a little time studying.
Your obvious effort at trying to identify me with the liberal democrat party of today, is infantile.
Quantrill
The limits of the authority of the United States Supreme Court is stated in the US Constitution. It is obvious that you really have no use for this document. The last attempt at a secession ended up in a civil war. It certainly was not a peaceful solution then. What exactly is this division anyway and why should anyone really care?
Actually, the Democrat party of today, is the exact same Democrat party of 1861.
You're conflating the notion of right wing vs. left wing with political parties.
In fact, you, like most, don't know what a liberal is, or the meaning of the word.
I'll give you a hint. Liberal couldn't properly describe the Democrat platform, ever.
You kinda come off as a retarded, mountain dew drinking, Confederate flag waving, piece of white trash.
Not saying you are, but using the name Quantrill; is what the FBI would call a clue.
Woohoo. Yeehaw. The south is gonna rise again.
How many negros you lookin to round up there, Quantrill?
Oh yes, the American Civil War, was a war over state rights. The right of certain states to subjugate human beings to a life of bondage. Humans made the personal property of another.
There is a slight difference between the Democrats of 1861 and today.
The Democrats of today have found it more palatable to subjugate humans to the state, rather than another person, by use of social welfare initiatives.
It's a shame, they even get their modern slaves to vote for the travesty.
You're conflating the notion of right wing vs. left wing with political parties.
In fact, you, like most, don't know what a liberal is, or the meaning of the word.
I'll give you a hint. Liberal couldn't properly describe the Democrat platform, ever.
You kinda come off as a retarded, mountain dew drinking, Confederate flag waving, piece of white trash.
Not saying you are, but using the name Quantrill; is what the FBI would call a clue.
Woohoo. Yeehaw. The south is gonna rise again.
How many negros you lookin to round up there, Quantrill?
Oh yes, the American Civil War, was a war over state rights. The right of certain states to subjugate human beings to a life of bondage. Humans made the personal property of another.
There is a slight difference between the Democrats of 1861 and today.
The Democrats of today have found it more palatable to subjugate humans to the state, rather than another person, by use of social welfare initiatives.
It's a shame, they even get their modern slaves to vote for the travesty.
-
2
- Show all
If you had been paying attention to what I have said you would know that I recognize the last time a 'peaceful' secession was tried it ended up in a War between the States. My point is that we can learn from history and not 'repeat' the same mistake.
Apparently you haven't kept up with what has been said or your would not ask me your question concerning the 'division'. So, go back and reread. Educate yourself.
Quantrill
Apparently you haven't kept up with what has been said or your would not ask me your question concerning the 'division'. So, go back and reread. Educate yourself.
Quantrill
No it's not. Just because it carries the name 'democrat' doesn't mean it stands for the same things. How ignorant a statement that is. The South was once solid democrat. Today they are solid Republican. Why? Because the democratic party changed. The liberal left atheists found a home in the democratic party. Something it never did stand for before.
Right wing and left wing does define the different parties. Just as liberal, and conservative defines the parties.
Your 'hint' is wrong. Liberalism does define the democratic party toady. Just like leftist describes it. Just like atheistic describes it. This is why no Christian could or should ever vote democratic. The democratic party stands for everything the Christian is not.
I wave the Confederate flag. I am white. If that makes me white trash, I don't mind. It bothers you, not me.
Why do you blame the South for slavery? The Constitution protected slavery. That Constitution was the product of Northern and Southern States. When did the yankee become the moral voice against slavery and how and why, when they were the ones that perpetuated it? You're as ignorant of that conflict as you are the political parties.
Ponder these things at the next doughnut and coffee shop.
Quantrill
Right wing and left wing does define the different parties. Just as liberal, and conservative defines the parties.
Your 'hint' is wrong. Liberalism does define the democratic party toady. Just like leftist describes it. Just like atheistic describes it. This is why no Christian could or should ever vote democratic. The democratic party stands for everything the Christian is not.
I wave the Confederate flag. I am white. If that makes me white trash, I don't mind. It bothers you, not me.
Why do you blame the South for slavery? The Constitution protected slavery. That Constitution was the product of Northern and Southern States. When did the yankee become the moral voice against slavery and how and why, when they were the ones that perpetuated it? You're as ignorant of that conflict as you are the political parties.
Ponder these things at the next doughnut and coffee shop.
Quantrill
the history of abolition around the world is pretty interesting. its spread is strongly correlated with the growth of Christianity, but not immediately - as the populations of nations and cultures became more influenced by Christian faith and ethos, eventually thinking turned against it, and without forceful revolution but a revolution of common thought, slavery became viewed popularly as evil, with a philosophical basis in the inherent worth of all men and women coming from their creation by God, influenced by the advent of salvation being given to all mankind, not just to certain races or classes.
Christianity changed peoples hearts and minds, and in turn, they changed their views about slavery, having empathetic respect for others rather than egotistic pride over them.
Christianity changed peoples hearts and minds, and in turn, they changed their views about slavery, having empathetic respect for others rather than egotistic pride over them.
-
2
- Show all