Doesn’t everyone wait almost four decades to report a sexual assault?
my point was. based on the pictures in her yearbook, she was a party girl. while I am in no way saying that any kind of anything done to a women without her consent is justified, being as it seems like she went to these parties often.
so, the media's making her out to be a innocent victim is a fraud. victim of something? maybe. innocent ? no way.
Is she a Republican or Democrat? Odds say she is a Democrat. Thus, she would have much to gain by lying.
Quantrill
"Despite what is the truth"? Do you realize what you are saying? You are saying give in to anyone who can claim to have something on a candidate, whether true or not.
The Democrats have set a precedent. All you have to do is find someone willing to claim a crime against them them by the candidate. Thus everything is on hold and you may as well dismiss the candidate. If you allow this, then this is now the norm. You can expect it to occur with every Supreme Court nomination.
Best to find out the truth, and then punish those who have willingly engaged in this illegal activity of finding an accuser for the purpose of destroying the candidate.
Quantrill
Well, do you think the SCOTUS is best served with a Justice associated with his reputation in the judiciary, or, a Justice associated with dr. Ford?
What say you, Mr Quantrill?
she is not only a dem, but a card carrying dem who has donated to the party
'associated'? Now all you do is to 'associate' someone with someone else or something? All you know is Kavanaugh's reputation as a judge. Correct?
Quantrill
You’re dodging my question using circular reasoning.
Please answer the question.
I did answer your question. All you know is Kavanaugh's reputation as a judge. Therefore, you should want him appointed. Unless, he is guilty of knowing a Miss Ford. As I said, is that what you are saying?
I don't see any circular reasoning in that. I see good sense in that.
Quantrill
No, you keep on dodging.
Furthermore you don’t seem to realize that this is not merely about the judge and/or his reputation. It is about the court.
The court doesn’t need a justice where a significant number of people, rightfully or not, have doubts about his moral standards. After all, he is candidate for the SCOTUS, he’s not trying to get elected dog catcher.
Like it or not, mud slinging works more often than not, and Mr Kavanugh has just fell victim to it.
Years ago I had a lawyer lie in an affidavit in a "case" I was involved in - he lied to cover his arse.
Ford has nothing to gain by lying.
Kavanaugh has.
Which means she has all the reason in the world to lie and try and stop Kavanaugh's appointment.
Quantrill
Just because someone slings mud means nothing. As I said, you know nothing about Kavanaugh except that he has been a credible judge.
Again, I can't believe what you are saying. 'Rightfully or not'? That means no one will ever again be appointed a judge. All the other side has to do is find some one to sling some mud...rightfully or not. Stupid.
Quantrill
The modus operandi of the Democrat party.....come lie for us and you will be paid off and rich..............
No, you keep on dodging.
Furthermore you don’t seem to realize that this is not merely about the judge and/or his reputation. It is about the court.
The court doesn’t need a justice where a significant number of people, rightfully or not, have doubts about his moral standards. After all, he is candidate for the SCOTUS, he’s not trying to get elected dog catcher.
Like it or not, mud slinging works more often than not, and Mr Kavanugh has just fell victim to it.
You’re dodging my question using circular reasoning.
Please answer the question.
Ummm ......The Republican party is no stranger to corruption either, western democracy is in a bad place all around.