How does it fit in the 70 week prophesy?Probably the sack of Jerusalem by Titus. Ridiculous. Plenty of things that were prophesied in the Old Testament has not occurred yet.
How does it fit in the 70 week prophesy?Probably the sack of Jerusalem by Titus. Ridiculous. Plenty of things that were prophesied in the Old Testament has not occurred yet.
I mean, how does the calculation come up to 70AD, do you mind showing how it precisely comes to 70AD?Easily. The New covenant, the destruction of the temple, the end of the old, Jewish, shadowy age of the Law and Israel. The age of "nations", the age of Christ, has begun.
Exactly as Daniel prophecised with his 70 weeks. If you do not want to say that in 490 years of Daniel there is 2,000 years gap, lol.
In 70 AD. Jerusalem and its temple were desolated, "stone was not left on stone", metaphorically. It was the worst masacre of Jews, Christ said to his disciples to run when they will see its coming.
How does it fit in the 70 week prophesy?
In 70 AD. Jerusalem and its temple were desolated, "stone was not left on stone", metaphorically. It was the worst masacre of Jews, Christ said to his disciples to run when they will see its coming.
69 weeks are fulfilled . . . ended at the cross (started when Cyrus allowed the Jews to return to their homeland). One week remains unfulfilled, the time of Jacob's trouble. Those seven years are still future.
Too many studies are available on line for me to try to 'precisely' explain it on this chat/message board. Research both sides - don't be stuck on one.
I mean, how does the calculation come up to 70AD, do you mind showing how it precisely comes to 70AD?
According to Daniel, the Messiah comes at the 69th week and the abomination is set in the middle of the 70th week, it would be a stretch to reach 70AD as the end of the matter.
I know of things that you don't know, trust me. There's never going to be a 7 year anything.
The end of age will be like the days of Noah; everything will be NORMAL- people will be eating and drinking and marrying and being given to marriage.
time to rethink your false theology.
Just a question, do you want to say that the old age did not end in the first century, just because you do not see the calculation or because it was delayed by 40 years? You know it did.
No, it will not affect anything. There is no theological basis for the third temple. God has no use for that. He does not want animal sacrifices anymore.
Nope.-457 + 490 = 33 AD.
One generation (40 years to 70 AD) was given to Jews to prepare. This is "this generation" Christ was frequently talking about.
The details will differ on the basis of which textual version, which translation and interpretation of Daniel you use.
You need to read Daniel 9:26,27. It clearly speaks of the Messiah being cut off and in the middle of the week 31/2 years the oblations will cease.
Well, I'll just have to continue my ministry of posting truth to error . . . you chose your views, I mine. There are roughly 500 lurkers on this site that are reading - not posting, watching - not participating. I post, for the most point, to them. When, or if I am banned (as a couple of members tried to to last evening) I'll consider my ministry here to have fulfilled it's course . . . and move on.
Gladly many are not impressed by all the so-called 'biblical scholars' here.
Wrong, It speaks of messiah getting cut off at the end or immediately after the 69th week. Which literally happened. As we should have expected to happen, from a prophesy from God.You need to read Daniel 9:26,27. It clearly speaks of the Messiah being cut off and in the middle of the week 31/2 years the oblations will cease.
It is not 70AD but around 90AD.
Wow, are you still promoting this lie? You ought to be ashamed of yourself.When, or if I am banned (as a couple of members tried to to last evening)...
No, i don't plan or wish that people are banned. Myself have expressed radical views that threatened my stay here; i'm usually opposed to the popular doctrines.
But you 'll help if you explain what you say about the 7 year great tribulation in light of what Jesus said about things in the end of age being normal.
So, what desolation happened in 33 AD, according to you? Thats the middle of the week.
Also, the text is ambiguous:
And one week shall establish the covenant with many: and in the midst of the week my sacrifice and drink-offering shall be taken away: and on the temple shall be the abomination of desolations; and at the end of time an end shall be put to the desolation.
It does not have to be read that the temple will be desolated in the midst of the week. Therefore it cannot be a reason for refuting 70 AD.
70 AD or 90 AD, its actually not very important in 2018 AD. The important thing is that it already happened in the past.