It has often been said that this is a parable while yet others contend and say it is not a parable.
So with that in mind lets look at a few examples on how this is clearly a parable.
1) It starts out by saying "There was a certain..." we have a few examples of this same phrase and with this phrase all of them are parables. [Mt. 21:33, Lk 7:41]
2) Lazarus was poor and yet he was physically poor but the fact was that he was Spiritually poor and that can coincide with that of Mt. 5
Hello Carl11
forgive me, but your claim of Lazarus being spiritually poor is not supported in the context. In fact, that his spirit went to the placed of comfort would demonstrate that he was spiritually rich. First of all the actual name of Lazarus is being used, as well as Moses, Abraham and the name of the literal location of Hades. This is not consistent with parables as a parable uses symbolism to represent what is literal. The context supports the reference to Lazarus as being literally poor i.e. lacking the basic requirements for life which is supported by the fact that he is laid at the gate of the rich man longing to be fed from the rich man's table, which would demonstrate his lack of sustenance. Lazarus' material poorness is also in opposition to the rich man living in luxury every day. The context then demonstrates that this is referring to the lack of basic material life necessities of Lazarus and the material richness of the rich man.
3) A drop of water on the tongue. This idea can be liked unto the idea of a car that has just overheated and the radiator is dry and yet some how a drop of water is going to cool the car off or likewise being such dire torment and burning a drop of water is going to satisfy.
The above also does not support your claim in that, for anyone being in Hades in torment in flame, any relief would be greatly desired. As Abraham said to the rich man, "remember in your life time you received you good things and Lazarus received bad things? Now he is comforted and you are in torment."
4) There are no verses showing that the unsaved once they die they will ever have eternal life. This idea is shown as one being born again as depicted in Jn. 3.
After cross-reverencing and comparing all the related scriptures, that once a person dies the grace of God is no longer in operation for that person, as their record is sealed. Consider what Jesus said to the religious leaders of His time:
"Then He told them, “
You are from below; I am from above. You are of this world; I am not of this world. That is why I told you that you would die in your sins. For unless you believe that I am He, you will die in your sins.”
What is the reward for sin?
"For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.”
The following is the state of death in the lake of fire:
"And a third angel followed them, calling out in loud a voice, “If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark on his forehead or on his hand, he too will drink the wine of God’s anger, poured undiluted into the cup of His wrath. And he will be tormented in fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment will rise forever and ever. Day and night there will be no rest for those who worship the beast and his image, or for anyone who receives the mark of his name.”
Regarding the above, I would point out that, in order to be tormented in the presence of the Lamb and the holy angels, the individual would have to be existing in order to experience that torment in their presence. Likewise, the scripture states that "the smoke of their torment will rise forever and ever and that they will have no rest day or night, which also demonstrates that the individual must exist in order for their smoke of their torment to ascend up forever and to have no rest day or night.
5) There is a great gulf / chasm between them and there is darkness and considering heaven is in the 3rd heaven and we assume that hell is down below and so how could one possible see that far from such a distance.
Your error is assuming that Abraham and Lazarus are in the third heaven, when the scripture does not support this. Both the rich man and Lazarus died and their bodies were buried, but we see their spirits conscious and aware both being in Sheol/Hades. The area that Abraham and Lazarus were in was separated from the area where the rich man was. Abraham goes on to say that between us and you a great chasm has been fixed so that no one can cross over from either side, which again would demonstrate that both areas were in the same location, i.e. Hades. How in the world expositors come to the conclusion that Abraham and Lazarus are in heaven escapes me, as there is absolutely nothing in the context that would suggest that.
6) The idea of torment and suffering in fire has caused great confusing and yet I can see why. But the one thing that is a common thread throughout the Bible is that Christ spoke in parables. So with that in mind fire has to do with that of judgement and the idea of suffering and being tormented in a fire is a picture showing what it is like to be cut off from the glory of God and his kingdom.
I have heard this false apologetic regarding Christ speaking only in parables many times, which false teachers do in order to take away the true meaning. The reference to Jesus speaking in parables was to that generation of Israel in fulfillment of the prophecy in Isaiah:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Then the disciples came to Jesus and asked, “
Why do You speak to the people in parables?”
He replied, “
The knowledge of the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them. Whoever has will be given more, and he will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him. This is why I speak to them in parables:
‘Though seeing, they do not see;
though hearing, they do not hear or understand.’
In them the prophecy of Isaiah is fulfilled:
‘You will be ever hearing but never understanding;
you will be ever seeing but never perceiving.
For this people’s heart has grown callous;
they hardly hear with their ears,
and they have closed their eyes.
Otherwise they might see with their eyes,
hear with their ears,
understand with their hearts,
and turn,
and I would heal them.’
But blessed are your eyes because they see, and your ears because they hear. For truly I tell you, many prophets and righteous men longed to see what you see but did not see it, and to hear what you hear but did not hear it."
Notice in the scripture above, the disciples ask "why do you speak to the people in parables," which would be referring to that generation of Israel and the not those who believe in Christ. In support of this, when Jesus answers them He says "The knowledge of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you" i.e. the church. But regarding the Lord speaking in parables, it was in fulfillment of the prophecy of Isaiah which the Lord then quotes. Therefore, Jesus did not speak to us in parables and so we can know what the word of God is saying and God means what He says. Therefore, when God uses the supporting words of torment, punishment, eternal, everlasting, forever and ever, no rest day or night, that's exactly what He means.
This idea of reading as it literally stands would be using the same idea as in Mrk. 16 as to picking up serpents and getting bit and not dying or drinking cyanided and expecting to live.
All in all there is no doubt that this account
Really Carl11? Tell me what you think of the following:
"Paul gathered a pile of brushwood and, as he put it on the fire, a viper, driven out by the heat, fastened itself on his hand. When the islanders saw the snake hanging from his hand, they said to each other, “This man must be a murderer; for though he escaped from the sea, the goddess Justice has not allowed him to live.”
But Paul shook the snake off into the fire and suffered no ill effects."