But..he also LEAVES the 99 to persue nd FIND the sheep that is lost...He couldve just said to the sheep.."ok..your choice..good riddence..1 less moith to feed..youre on your own"..he didnt..
Isn’t He awesome!
Hallelujah.
He loves us.
Amen.
JPT
But..he also LEAVES the 99 to persue nd FIND the sheep that is lost...He couldve just said to the sheep.."ok..your choice..good riddence..1 less moith to feed..youre on your own"..he didnt..
i don't know where you got that idea; i was saying it's not a parable instructing His disciples what to do; it's a parable describing what He does.
J...,
Once Saved Always Saved. OSAS....but, don't be impressed it's a new age religion concept out of the moral and social revolution of the 1960's without any biblical validation whatsoever.
Also included in such garbage thinking is the concept that even baptism is NOT necessary...any more...since Christ was baptized for us and/or mom's Amniotic fluid baptized us. (LOL..if one can believe that)...with many other reasons why baptism is not necessary even though The Bible tells us baptism is required for sin repentance cleansing.
There are other elements to this .....new age religion....envelope that is as funny if it were not leading so many astray. As scripture says..........in the end times ......many will be deceived.
Please explain how Jesus does this today?
I would offer in parables the number 1, 10, 100 and 1000 in increments are used a metaphor to represent an unknow as the whole of what ever is in view. 99+1 = 100 all the sheep .
Not 1 will be lost, no one can snatch them from his hand (will)
You place restriction on me which you do not place on yourself.Then stop using it to prove 'once saved always saved', people!
Actually, I do believe agreeing with God is the first step in the born again experience.It seems most in the church are taking false comfort in simply agreeing with God that the gospel is true, not realizing that they have to place their trust in what God has shown them to be true in order for them to be saved.
I believe Jesus set the example for us by being baptized and recueving the holy spirit and no..NOTE jesus was NOT a baby when baptized...to me..baptizm is sybolic..representing the "old man/nature/ being washed new (by submersion) it represents the committment weve already made to Christ in our hearts and wanting to share that as an act of obediance and understanding with family n friends..its like a weddimg cerimony...its only REPRESENTS the commitment if love the couple has already mafe to each other and sharing that with others..
And no..baptism isnt REQUIRED for any PART of our salvation since it usually takes place AFTER the fact. Anither representation is taking communion..etc
I believe Jesus set the example for us by being baptized and recueving the holy spirit and no..NOTE jesus was NOT a baby when baptized...to me..baptizm is sybolic..representing the "old man/nature/ being washed new (by submersion) it represents the committment weve already made to Christ in our hearts and wanting to share that as an act of obediance and understanding with family n friends..its like a weddimg cerimony...its only REPRESENTS the commitment if love the couple has already mafe to each other and sharing that with others..
And no..baptism isnt REQUIRED for any PART of our salvation since it usually takes place AFTER the fact. Anither representation is taking communion..etc
Continuation @Ralph-
In other words, our text is describing those who are continually crucifying Christ by their falling away. According to the unpardonable sin view, this makes sense. Those who have persistently rejected Christ are obviously crucifying Him again and subjecting Him to disgrace.
However, when we realize the continuous nature of anastaurountas, another option for interpreting this verse presents itself. As long as we insist on a fallen away life, we’re crucifying Christ and we can’t repent because repentance requires submission to God. But if we truly submit to God, then we’re no longer crucifying Christ and so repentance is possible.
In the parable of the prodigal son (Luke 15:11-32), the younger son started out with his father. Because this is a parable, it should be understood in a symbolic sense. The father is clearly a symbol for God the Father, and the father’s house refers to heaven or a life in fellowship with God. So we can safely argue that the son was saved at the beginning of this story. But the prodigal son fell away; he took his inheritance and traveled to a far country where he lived a wild life. Eventually, he hit rock bottom and decided to return home. But he had to leave his old life before he could return home. He didn’t return home with a prostitute on each arm! In other words, while the son was living his wild life, he was crucifying Christ. But in order to return home, he stopped crucifying Christ.
Conclusion
I’m not sure which of these two interpretations (option one or option two) is best. They both have merit. In either case, it’s clear that the situation isn’t hopeless for those who have a sincere desire to repent. Remember, David committed adultery then killed a man to hide his previous sin. Yet when he repented, God forgave him. In the end, “if we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:9).
You just demonstrated that you misunderstand. It's not about must confess "this" list of sins, but don't have to confess "that" list of sins. Rather than focusing on confession of every single sin that we commit as we commit them as an additional requirement to remain cleansed (continuous revolving door of sin - uncleansed/lost again; confess - cleansed/saved all over again) and if we forget a sin we are toast, John has in mind a settled recognition and ongoing acknowledgment that one is a sinner in need of cleansing and forgiveness. While false teachers/unbelievers say they have no sin "present tense" (vs. 8) or say they have not sinned "past tense" (vs. 10) Christians confess their sins. The term "confess" means to say the same thing about sin as God does, acknowledge His perspective about sin, which is on an ongoing basis.m...,
There is no misunderstanding of verse 9. If not...then please tell me which ones we must and which ones we don't have to?
The Greek word for "repent" is "metanoia" (noun) and "matanoeo" (verb) you see as defined in the Strongs #3340, 3341: to think differently or afterwards, reconsider. After thought, change of mind. This change of mind is on an ongoing basis. So repentance basically means a "change of mind" and the context must determine what is involved in this change of mind. Where salvation is in view, repentance actually precedes saving faith in Christ and is not a totally separate act from faith. It is actually the same coin with two sides. Repentance is on one side, what you change your mind about and faith in Christ is on the positive side, the new direction of this change of mind. *Repentance and faith are two sides of the same experience of receiving Christ.Regardless, we must repent of our sins in an ongoing basis. That's the reason The Lord's pray includes..."forgive us of our trespasses as we forgive those who trespasses against us".....a recommended daily prayer.
Believers receive the Holy Spirit through Spirit baptism, not water baptism (Acts 10:43-47; 11:16-17; Ephesians 1:13).J...,
Scripture tells me that Christ never sinned therefore he was born with the Holy Spirit and always had it. He did not need baptism to receive it as you and I need it.
Your absolutely right."It is not of ourselves, it is a gift of God" means exactly what it says it means.
J...,
Suggest you study scriptures again. It is required.
If you need citations let me know.
J...,
Scripture tells me that Christ never sinned therefore he was born with the Holy Spirit and always had it. He did not need baptism to receive it as you and I need it.
J...,
Your conclusion is different than that which you infer in your analysis. You conclude with..."providing we maintain until the end (death)" .....as scripture tells us. That is not OSAS thinking.
Please clarify.
That would have made you 12- 14 when I was saved ha ha!This whole thing i sent ralph was a theologins findins..conclusions for the debate on osas...i believe so theres no misunderstanding that when i was saved at age 7..i am FOREVER saved..my salvation CAN NOT be smatched or taken from me by MY accord or someone elses.