Then that would make contentions against the Gospel of Thomas as Gnostic and therefore dismissed invalid.![]()
This is about gospel to be equally for all.
Thomas scrolls date before the 4 Gospels we use now.
I provided several scriptures we already find in the 4 Gospels we use now. Thomas is full of those scriptures found in all 4 Gospels. So to say no one quoted Thomas is a LIAR!!
Thomas was not used because it's clear Christ did not teach nor believe the trinity!!
Sure.Yes, and will heaven be equal for all?
THIS CLAIMS THAT MATTHEW AND LUKE WAS WRITTEN LIKE THOMAS
Sayings of Thomas derive from a different tradition Although [the Gospel of Thomas] contains many sayings of Jesus that Luke and Matthew also include in their gospels, it contains other sayings that apparently derive from a tradition different from that of the synoptic gospels.38
I did post that. But Jude was written when all of those possible Books were available. And he said we have adequate knowledge now. But 400 years later some of those Books were banned.
Your point can only be relevant to when Jude wrote his letter, not 400 years after when the RCC removed Books!!
Are you claiming when Jude wrote his letter he knew as a fortune teller the RCC would ban certain Books?
Because we must believe that when Jude wrote this letter, those other Books were available. Especially since Jude quoted from Enoch, and we know the RCC banned Enoch.
So, if Jude knew these Books were being banned, why would he quote from a Book going to be banned?
Yeah that other tradition is called gnosticism.
I would say there are enough Biblical Scholars claiming Thomas IS NOT GNOSTIC that it should be seen as one of the Gospels!!
And female Biblical Scholars are also making this claim!!
AWESOME!!
The theology of the Gospel of Thomas does not jive with any particular system of Gnosis be it Naaseene, Valentinian, Basilidian, Carpocratian, or otherwise. … The traditional markers of Gnostic ideas are not present. There is no Sophia, Demiurge, Pleroma, Error, Aeons, or Archons.33
This Biblical Scholar claims IT IS NOT GNOSTIC!!
another one, there are many who say Thomas IS NOT GNOSTIC!!
This reading of the Gospel of Thomas places it squarely within early orthodoxy rather than outside. The Gospel of Thomas does not represent the voice of some late generic Gnostic heresy or some early unique sapiential35 Christianity. Rather it is quite cogent with early Syrian Christianity as described in the oldest literature from the area.36
Wait a minute again. Is the current Bible with its 66 books Gods word? Or to put it another way did God "inspire" the writers of the 66 books of the Bible? Just to be clear I am not talking about the other books you claim were banned.
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
I never claimed those Books were not inspired by God, I claimed verses were tampered with by the Council.
Are female biblical scholars worthy of life?
OK, you believe in the TRINITY.
So, let's use your philosophy here!!
The Father -WORD -Holy Spirit are all considered MALE.
THERE ARE NO FEMALE ANGELS!!
ALL OF HEAVEN IS MALE!!
why would this verse bother you knowing ALL OF HEAVEN IS MALE ALREADY?
So women must become males to get to heaven?
I just proved that it is not GNOSTIC!!