God created everything "very good" Gen 1:31. Man made himself a sinner not God.Could God be so angry at sin? When his divine power and foresight created the paradigm of righteousness and sin and reward and penalty?
God created everything "very good" Gen 1:31. Man made himself a sinner not God.Could God be so angry at sin? When his divine power and foresight created the paradigm of righteousness and sin and reward and penalty?
THAT IS UTTER NONSENSE AND HERESY.No, it isn't. I posted several Bible translations showing Jesus participated in our sinful nature too.
THAT IS UTTER NONSENSE AND HERESY.
It is heresy to call Jesus a Man with a sin nature, just like every other man. That would automatically make Him a sinner, not the Savior.what is heresy? are you saying to call Jesus a man like the rest of us is heresy? if so doesnt the bible call Him a man several times?
Jesus is God, and God is Light, in whom THERE IS NO DARKNESS AT ALL. To suggest that the God-Man has a sin nature like all other men is to promote heresy.Prove it is heresy.
but all men, according to this doctrine, have this sin nature, so if He didnt have the sin nature how could He have been a man?It is heresy to call Jesus a Man with a sin nature, just like every other man. That would automatically make Him a sinner, not the Savior.
This thread is totally nonsensical and promotes heresy.
You need to prove that Jesus did not have our fallen human sin nature...FROM SCRIPTURE! Ranting that Jesus was sinnless is a strawman. I never claimed that Jesus sinned.Jesus is God, and God is Light, in whom THERE IS NO DARKNESS AT ALL. To suggest that the God-Man has a sin nature like all other men is to promote heresy.
Jesus could not be the Savior unless He was totally sinless (which means the absence of the sin nature). And I have posted several verses already to support that. Perhaps it is time for you to now admit that you are way off base, and need to get a proper understanding of Christ.
but all men, according to this doctrine, have this sin nature, so if He didnt have the sin nature how could He have been a man?
So when scripture says very plainly He is a man, it's nonsense to believe He is a man?j...,
That is nonsensical....man does not have the power of Christ...there are many differences in Christ and man.
As for His humanity there was no difference between Jesus and us except for He never sinned :j...,
That is nonsensical....man does not have the power of Christ...there are many differences in Christ and man.
As for His humanity there was no difference between Jesus and us except for He never sinned :
For this reason he had to be made like them, fully human in every way, in order that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in service to God, and that he might make atonement for the sins of the people.
Hebrews 2:17 NIV
https://bible.com/bible/111/heb.2.17.NIV
But you cherry pick and leave out words from the translation you used. You are ignoring "all to be likened to the brethren ". That says the same thing as the modern translations I use.You cherry pick translations to try to prove your point. Not honest. Here's what it literally says
From which he owed according to all to be likened to the brethren, that he should become a merciful and faithful high priest in the things towards God, so as to atone the sins of the people. Hebrews 2:17
This word means similar, not exactly.
G3666 ὁμοιόω homoioo (hom-oy-oh'-o) v.
1. to assimilate, i.e. compare
2. (passively) to become similar
[from G3664]
G3664 ὅμοιος homoios (hom'-oy-os) adj.
1. similar (in appearance or character)
Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words
1. homoioo (ὁμοιόω, 3666), “to make like” (akin to A, No. 1), is used (a) especially in the parables, with the significance of comparing, “likening,” or, in the passive voice, “being likened,” Matt. 7:24, 26; 11:16; 13:24; 18:23; 22:2 (RV, “likened”); 25:1; Mark 4:30; Luke 7:31; 13:18, RV, “liken” (KJV, “resemble”); v. 20; in several of these instances the point of resemblance is not a specific detail, but the whole circumstances of the parable; (b) of making “like,” or, in the passive voice, of being made or becoming “like,” Matt. 6:8; Acts 14:11, “in the likeness of (men),” lit., “being made like” (aorist participle, passive); Rom. 9:29; Heb. 2:17, of Christ in being “made like” unto His brethren, i.e., in partaking of human nature, apart from sin (cf. v. 14).
But you cherry pick and leave out words from the translation you used. You are ignoring "all to be likened to the brethren ". That says the same thing as the modern translations I use.
Yes you are right. He would be her seed because she carried him in her womb.I am the only one here with Scripture. The Christ was Mary's seed:
And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her seed; He shall bruise you on the head, And you shall bruise him on the heel."
Genesis 3:15 NASB
https://bible.com/bible/100/gen.3.15.NASB
See, there you go ignoring your own translation again. It doesn't just say "likened to", it says "all to be likened to". That means in every way Jesus was like us.I didn't cherry pick anything. That was a literal translation from the Greek. It shows what that verse actually says without the added unnecessary and wrong words that distort its meaning. "Likened to" is not the same thing as "made exactly as", as you wrongly teach.
See, there you go ignoring your own translation again. It doesn't just say "likened to", it says "all to be likened to". That means in every way Jesus was like us.
How can you be so illiterate? You are drunk on eiseges.How can you be so undiscerning? It says "he owed according to all to be likened to". You're simply assuming that all includes a sin nature, contrary to basic good sense and scripture. The holy spirit departed from Adam because he had a sin nature, yet somehow you think that it dwelt in it's fullness in Christ with a sin nature. You really have drunk the kool-aid your church teaches.
How can you be so illiterate? You are drunk on eiseges.