how is it hate and scorn that I simply ask you to provide a source that backs up what you say?? I posted I direct quote from you above, asked you to provide a source based on what you said. how is that hate and scorn??
you said that the translation was corrupted. well, since you have the proper translations ( you say you do ), and the Bible was not written in English, deductive reasoning says there must be uncorrupted translations . so, source where they.
if you do not do so, then you are simply bearing witness of your self, which Jesus said is not true. the Law says out of the mouth of 2 or 3 witnesses a matter will be settled.
so, if you want to call being simply asked, backed by Scripture, to give a source of what YOU SAY , hate and scorn, well, o.k., but i do not see how......
you said that the translation was corrupted. well, since you have the proper translations ( you say you do ), and the Bible was not written in English, deductive reasoning says there must be uncorrupted translations . so, source where they.
if you do not do so, then you are simply bearing witness of your self, which Jesus said is not true. the Law says out of the mouth of 2 or 3 witnesses a matter will be settled.
so, if you want to call being simply asked, backed by Scripture, to give a source of what YOU SAY , hate and scorn, well, o.k., but i do not see how......
This looks like hatred and scorn, and not simply asking a question.
The Scriptures say the Priests corrupted the teaching of God. I posted one such scripture that confirms this belief. In fact, it is the scriptures that teach me that the Priests corrupted God's Words., there are many, many more. I really don't understand what you want from me, other than to ridicule and insult.