But if you read Dan 12:2 along with that of Jn. 5:29 superficialy one could come to the conclusion you have but read it again it does not say they are raised to life. Sure they are raised but not unto life, just because one sees the word resurrection does not mean they are raised to life. You can look at the rich man and Lazarus as your example but it is a parable. One clue is if it was such great torment then why does God use tormented as in sorrow.
Hello carl11,
I beg to differ! The word "anastasis" translated "Resurrection" is defined as follows:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Strong's Concordance
anastasis: a standing up, i.e. a resurrection, a raising up, rising
Original Word: ἀνάστασις, εως, ἡ
Part of Speech: Noun, Feminine
Transliteration: anastasis
Phonetic Spelling: (an-as'-tas-is)
Short Definition: a rising again, resurrection
Definition: a rising again, resurrection.
HELPS Word-studies
386 anástasis (from
303 /aná, "up, again" and
2476 /hístēmi, "to stand") –
literally, "stand up" (or "stand again"), referring to physical resurrection (of the body).
Christ's
physical resurrection is the foundation of Christianity, which also guarantees the future resurrection of all believers (see Jn 6:39,40,44).
[
386 /anástasis ("resurrection")
refers to the physical, bodily resurrection of Christ – and people (
both of the redeemed and the unredeemed).]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The word resurrection always refers to a bodily standing up again, i.e. coming back to life. Jesus is the example, as His body was in the tomb and then three days later He returned to His body which was raised immortal and glorified. Regarding the resurrection, Paul said the following as well:
"and I have the same hope in God as these men themselves have, that there will be a resurrection of both the righteous and the wicked."
And Dan.12:2 most certainly does refer to both the resurrection of the righteous and the wicked. It statues that both the righteous and the wicked will "awake" which is referring to the resurrection of their bodies.
You can look at the rich man and Lazarus as your example but it is a parable.
The rich man and Lazarus is in no way a parable. As I have pointed out in many other posts, parables use symbolism to represent what is literal, sower = Christ, good seed = sons of the kingdom, weeds = sons of the evil one, harvest = end of the age, harvesters = the angels, etc. In opposition, the rich man and Lazarus event uses real names, Abraham, Lazarus, Moses and the literal place of Hades. In addition, there is nothing in the context that would lead the reader to a parabolic interpretation, nor the parabolic meanings if it was a parable. If you put 1000 people who have never been tainted by the teachings of men regarding the rich man and Lazarus as being a parable and if you told them to present the parabolic meanings, not one would be in agreement. You would have to give another meaning for everyone and everything in the rich man and Lazarus if it was a parable.
One clue is if it was such great torment then why does God use tormented as in sorrow.
The sorrow is the torment of being in agony in flame according to the context. But I am sure that what will be worse than the flames, will be the complete separation from God their creator. Hades is open 24/7 and people are continually pouring in their day after day, remembering all the opportunities they had to receive Christ and now it is too late.
Instead of believing the truth, why do you people fight so hard to resist it?