My friend Oleg wrote this and he's very good at articulating his thoughts. I agree with a lot of it. Curious on your thoughts.
It's basically a conversation of asking questions, things we can ask ourselves to see if we agree or disagree with his logical progression. One reason I like this is because God does build line upon line. So if we haven't agreed with a prior truth, there is nowhere for the next truth to be built upon. I believe going through step-by-step receiving truth gives us greater understanding of Scripture on a heart not just a head level. And what believe in our heart we see in our actions.
So starting from the beginning for us to begin to analyze our logical frameworks about the gospel.
- Do you believe that Jesus took the sins of the humankind on the cross?
- Of course
- Do you think that he did that only for people who lived before and during his time?
- Well, he did it for all humans
- So then, he did bear the sins of the people who weren't even born during his time, right? Like you and I?
- (Discomfort begins to set in), Well technically yes, but ...
- It's a simple Yes or No question. Did he or didn't be?
- Fine, he did
- So then, when you commit a sin today - is that legally covered by the cross of Calvary if you are in Christ?
- Yes, but wouldn't this give you a license to sin?
- If you know your wife would never leave you no matter what, wouldn't that give you a license to sleep with other women?
- Well, it's not the same
- It's pretty close. According to that logic, the "till death separates us" part of your wedding vows is essentially an automatic permission for you to commit adultery. Your wife's faithfulness to you doesn't give you an automatic license to be faithless to her. Or does it?
- No. I never looked at it this way, I guess.
- Well, that's exactly the problem. We think God's ways are so much higher than our ways that God becomes humanly unrelatable. So, getting back to it. What's keeping you from sleeping with women other than your wife?
- The fact that I love her.
- Exactly. The fact that you've separated yourself from others for her. That commitment expressed in your separation unto your wife is called "holiness". But we are not talking about holiness right now. We are talking about legal justification.
- I didn't know those things were different.
- Well, most Christians don't see that difference, and that's why we are having this discussion. So then, getting back to justification. If you are in Christ and you committed a sin - did Jesus bear it?
- Yes?
- Did he pay for it on the cross?
- Yes
- Did he die for it?
- Sure
- Did God pronounced the verdict "paid in full" on Christ - and did that for sins that weren't his own but were mine and yours?
- He did
- What is the evidence that Jesus paid in full for all those sins?
- In the fact that Jesus was resurrected from the dead.
- Then was your particular sin paid for in full by Christ?
- It was
- What's the evidence that it is still considered paid in full?
- The fact that Christ is alive today
- Can you trust Jesus to stay alive?
- Of course
- Can you trust God to keep his end of the deal?
- Sure
- Does God faithfulness make it OK for you to sin?
- Of course not. This question shouldn't even come up.
- Exactly! If we think that it's OK for us to sin if we won't be legally liable for it, what does it tell about us?
- That we believe what someone said about us: we are born criminals, and that we are only in it for a free out of jail card. And that aside from that, there isn't much else.
- And who says that we are born criminals, and that all we can expect is a free out of jail card?
- Most Christians that I've talked to seem to think that. That's basically what they told me the Gospel was all about. Maybe we should stop telling people that God sees them as being born criminals, and that he sees Christians as conditional parolees.
- Maybe we should. First Christians indoctrinate each other into the wrong identity, then they wonder why people behave in accordance with the identity into which they have indoctrinated one another, and then they change to Gospel to fit with that picture.
It's basically a conversation of asking questions, things we can ask ourselves to see if we agree or disagree with his logical progression. One reason I like this is because God does build line upon line. So if we haven't agreed with a prior truth, there is nowhere for the next truth to be built upon. I believe going through step-by-step receiving truth gives us greater understanding of Scripture on a heart not just a head level. And what believe in our heart we see in our actions.
So starting from the beginning for us to begin to analyze our logical frameworks about the gospel.
- Do you believe that Jesus took the sins of the humankind on the cross?
- Of course
- Do you think that he did that only for people who lived before and during his time?
- Well, he did it for all humans
- So then, he did bear the sins of the people who weren't even born during his time, right? Like you and I?
- (Discomfort begins to set in), Well technically yes, but ...
- It's a simple Yes or No question. Did he or didn't be?
- Fine, he did
- So then, when you commit a sin today - is that legally covered by the cross of Calvary if you are in Christ?
- Yes, but wouldn't this give you a license to sin?
- If you know your wife would never leave you no matter what, wouldn't that give you a license to sleep with other women?
- Well, it's not the same
- It's pretty close. According to that logic, the "till death separates us" part of your wedding vows is essentially an automatic permission for you to commit adultery. Your wife's faithfulness to you doesn't give you an automatic license to be faithless to her. Or does it?
- No. I never looked at it this way, I guess.
- Well, that's exactly the problem. We think God's ways are so much higher than our ways that God becomes humanly unrelatable. So, getting back to it. What's keeping you from sleeping with women other than your wife?
- The fact that I love her.
- Exactly. The fact that you've separated yourself from others for her. That commitment expressed in your separation unto your wife is called "holiness". But we are not talking about holiness right now. We are talking about legal justification.
- I didn't know those things were different.
- Well, most Christians don't see that difference, and that's why we are having this discussion. So then, getting back to justification. If you are in Christ and you committed a sin - did Jesus bear it?
- Yes?
- Did he pay for it on the cross?
- Yes
- Did he die for it?
- Sure
- Did God pronounced the verdict "paid in full" on Christ - and did that for sins that weren't his own but were mine and yours?
- He did
- What is the evidence that Jesus paid in full for all those sins?
- In the fact that Jesus was resurrected from the dead.
- Then was your particular sin paid for in full by Christ?
- It was
- What's the evidence that it is still considered paid in full?
- The fact that Christ is alive today
- Can you trust Jesus to stay alive?
- Of course
- Can you trust God to keep his end of the deal?
- Sure
- Does God faithfulness make it OK for you to sin?
- Of course not. This question shouldn't even come up.
- Exactly! If we think that it's OK for us to sin if we won't be legally liable for it, what does it tell about us?
- That we believe what someone said about us: we are born criminals, and that we are only in it for a free out of jail card. And that aside from that, there isn't much else.
- And who says that we are born criminals, and that all we can expect is a free out of jail card?
- Most Christians that I've talked to seem to think that. That's basically what they told me the Gospel was all about. Maybe we should stop telling people that God sees them as being born criminals, and that he sees Christians as conditional parolees.
- Maybe we should. First Christians indoctrinate each other into the wrong identity, then they wonder why people behave in accordance with the identity into which they have indoctrinated one another, and then they change to Gospel to fit with that picture.
- 2
- 1
- 1
- Show all