As far as the OP is concerned you already have the problem theologically to begin with that is why the OP is technically in error. The point is once a person is born again then he can no longer unborn again. It is you who says in the OP that he is “born again” and by implication he is a possessing Christian, now a possessing Christian can no longer be unloose.
Now you are saying, his actions are not well aligned and your evidence is still a moot. You have fallen judgment to his spiritual standing with God. Of course, A real Christian, born again may still commit sin/s but not in any way be denied of his position, possession and standing before God.
If you have some political issues with Mr. Pacqiao, I am not the one to tell you. Another thing, the burden of proof is on you since it was you that says he is a professing Christian di tototo na born again. Look, your evidence is just a link, I have no time to read that. Perhaps it will be helpful if you gave a gist information to the link you provided and that’s all.
One thing more, siguro po pwede pa na sabihin that Mr. Pacquaio has made an unchristian-like though still this is still debatable but not to the point that his actions made him unchristian. That’s a big difference!
I think, mas nakakabuti na maging aware tayo sa mga post natin not passing judgment agad agad dahil ito ay nakakasama sa image ng ating bansa. Stand for the truth just for the truth.
God bless you kabayan..