I don't think the KJV is inspired, that's what I believed.
Thanks,
I believe it is given by inspiration...
Thanks
I don't think the KJV is inspired, that's what I believed.
Thanks,
I don't think the KJV is inspired, that's what I believed.
Thanks,
This is Relativism at its finest. There is no standard Word of God in existence,
There is no standard Word of God in existence, so anything goes,
and everything becomes the "standard".
So here is the mockery of the "standard" when it comes to Bibles. You can take your pick from five "standards":
English Standard Version
In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.
New American Standard Bible
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
Holman Christian Standard Bible
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
International Standard Version
In the beginning, God created the universe.
American Standard Version
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
Since there is no Hebrew word there which translates into "universe" this has got to be the standard! And the Revised Standard Version has gone the way of the dodo.
DD,For over 400 years there was a standard Word of God, there was ONLY ONE Word of God the KJV during that time, it was on during the last days generation that people of that last days generation felt the standard Word of God (KJV) was in need of correcting, updated, fixed, repaired, etc... .. .. . And because of that, people now believe there is no standard Word of God. But there is, and always will be a Standard Word of God and that is the version that God ordained, the KJV.
Yes! Why can you not understand?
The word of God is not confined to one dialect of one human language. We have faith in God that he speaks all languages. We believe he has communicated to mankind before, during and after the KJV. We are not placing a restriction on God Almighty.
That is what you are all claiming KJV ONLY. What else can you possibly mean by it when you relentlessly attack other translations. And the constant badgering of other Christians over it is wrong.
Originally Posted by Nehemiah6![]()
![]()
This is Relativism at its finest. There is no standard Word of God in existence, so anything goes, and everything becomes the "standard". So here is the mockery of the "standard" when it comes to Bibles. You can take your pick from five "standards":
English Standard Version
In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.
New American Standard Bible
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
Holman Christian Standard Bible
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
International Standard Version
In the beginning, God created the universe.
American Standard Version
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
Since there is no Hebrew word there which translates into "universe" this has got to be the standard! And the Revised Standard Version has gone the way of the dodo.
The term "heavens and earth" means "all that is", i.e. "universe". Therefore ISV got it right, its simply only less literal.
Originally Posted by DiscipleDave![]()
![]()
For over 400 people Our Brothers and Sisters of the Lord Jesus Christ called the KJV the Word of God, are you saying they were foolish people?
Oh wait, they were not foolish then, but when new versions pop up in the last days, then if you believe what they believed to be the Word of God, then you are foolish?
Your thinking is flawed. Wasn't foolish for 400 years, but is now? How does that make any sense at all?
There is NOTHING foolish about using or even favoring the KJV. What many find objectionable is labeling other versions corrupt or worse of claiming exclusivity for the KJV.
There is NOTHING foolish about using or even favoring the KJV.
What many find objectionable is labeling other versions corrupt or worse of claiming exclusivity for the KJV.
For over 400 years there was a standard Word of God, there was ONLY ONE Word of God the KJV during that time...
The KJV was approved by God, Was ordained by God, Was protected by God, is the Word of God. All other versions are great versions to bring lost souls to the Lord Jesus Christ, but are NOT the Word of God, which is infallible. Other versions are fallible indeed. The KJV is TRUTH, and is the Standard.
I believe that any translation prayerfully undertaken by sincere and competent translators is or will be the Word of God.
I believe that any translation prayerfully undertaken by sincere and competent translators is or will be the Word of God.
2 Timothy 3:16 King James Version (KJV)
16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
According to the bible there is only one kind of scripture - inspired by God. If it's not inspired by God then it's not scripture.
NOTE: It did not say all scripture WAS given by inspiriation of God.
DD,
You have taken my words out of context and quoted them because you could not even understand that I was making an ironic remark.
Um, no. The Geneva Bible, Tyndale, Bishops, Coverdale, and dozens of translations in other languages existed during this period.
The KJV was merely the most common and best-known English Bible. That doesn't make it "the" standard.
Originally Posted by DiscipleDave![]()
![]()
The KJV was approved by God, Was ordained by God, Was protected by God, is the Word of God. All other versions are great versions to bring lost souls to the Lord Jesus Christ, but are NOT the Word of God, which is infallible. Other versions are fallible indeed. The KJV is TRUTH, and is the Standard.
Given that the KJV was translated from other versions, and largely followed the Bishops Bible, how can it be that all others are fallible and the KJV is not?
That is simply not logically or historically sound.
It also conflicts with what the KJV translators themselves wrote in their preface.
Amen, brother, amen.All of the following are found either 37 times in KJB or in 37 verses or both.
Saviour; ark of God; ark of the Lord; churches; his word; the cup; ministered; crucified; corner; branch; miracle(s); authority; shall hear; shall rise; wine (NT); grapes; manifest; treasure; the apostles;
Counting from Mark 1:1 to Revelation.
"the beginning" found in 37 verses
"the gospel" found in 74 (37x2) verses
"Jesus Christ" found in 185 (37x5) verses
"the Son" (case sensitive) found in 111 (37x3) verses
"Son of God" (case sensitive0 found in 37 verses
Anyone want to calculate the chance of this being random? This is one verse and I can tell you that the entire King James Bible exhibits a pattern of 7's and 37's. Try the same thing with Matthew 1:1; John 1:1; John 18:37; 1 John 5:7; 3 John 1:12 (the 222nd occurrence of the word "truth" in the KJB.
Amen, brother, amen.
Why he has been banned?FYI, James37 has been banned. He won't see your comment.![]()
Why he has been banned?
ANd yeah, I study the KJV, but also the Hebrew and Greek
Banned people can sill view the forums. They cannot post or use other site features that allow for communication with other members, though.FYI, James37 has been banned. He won't see your comment.![]()
From the site rules:
"Also please don't be making posts in the forums about someone else's ban. It doesn't help!"
That's good. Some "King James only" proponents eschew studying the original languages claiming that they are either irrelevant or, worse, where they contradict the KJV, they must be corrupt.
Um, no. They existed at the beginning, but not during the 400 years. please study this. They did not exist during the same period of the KJV, which period is over 400 years.
