Let me get this straight, you think I have a cavalier attitude and you are disgusted by my *description* of baptism. Yet you would have us insert the clergyman into a necessary role in one's salvation by virtue of him performing a brief baptism ceremony. Are you a minister perhaps? Apparently it doesn't bother you to take away sole credit from God for salvation. You are making some preacher who gets his trousers wet standing in the baptismal for a few minutes a necessary component. And yet you are disgusted by me and my cavalier attitude. Funny that. Funny and sad.
And why did you feel it necessary to insert this unrelated barb about communion? Is this how you interact with others in real life? If someone asks you a hard question or raises a point you don't like, you make up something about them to denigrate their position? Vitriol much do you? Perhaps you should adopt a kinder and gentler tone as you interact with others on this message board.
Standard operating procedure for Chambellites, change subject, misdirect, jump all over the bible out of context, Use the Old testament when they think it benefits their waterdog works based agenda, but let someone try to claim an Old testament passage of scripture to shed light on the opposing view, oh no you cant do that, that's the Old Testament that don't apply to us now. The Chambellites will jump back and forth all day to try and make a point but the rest of us are not aloud too.