R
Ralph-
Guest
You're not the first one to not want to answer the question. The person with no works is condemned by either answer.I'm only here to torment you before the time not argue..
![]()
You're not the first one to not want to answer the question. The person with no works is condemned by either answer.I'm only here to torment you before the time not argue..
![]()
It doesn't matter.
Is the 'believer' who has no works saved despite having no works because of 'once saved always saved'?
Or is the 'believer' who has no works not really born again?
It doesn't matter. That's my honest answer. What I believe is the person who has no works when Jesus comes back is not born again.
So I'll ask you.
Is the 'believer' who has no works saved despite having no works because of 'once saved always saved'?
Or is the 'believer' who has no works not really born again?
Which do you say is true?
Does this mean the believer can have no works and he is still saved, or is it that the 'believer' who has no works is actually not really born again? Which do you believe?
No, you're not understanding.
You have to have works OR ELSE YOU'RE NOT REALLY A BELIEVER.
That's a different argument than saying you have to have works to be saved and stay saved as you think I'm saying. In fact, that's the traditional once saved always saved argument but which seems to be being discarded by the church in favor of the new once saved always saved argument that says you are saved even if you have no works because you can not lose your salvation. That's making grace a license to sin but nobody wants to admit it. At least the old once saved always saved teaching did not make grace a license to sin.
So it is impossible to actually answer either of your questions because the situation you are speaking of does not exist.
It doesn't matter. That's my honest answer. What I believe is the person who has no works when Jesus comes back is not born again.
So I'll ask you.
Is the 'believer' who has no works saved despite having no works because of 'once saved always saved'?
Or is the 'believer' who has no works not really born again?
Which do you say is true?
So why haven't you been defending against the people who believe 'once saved always saved' but who don't believe the part about the person who isn't working is not even saved to begin with?
Why are you not defending against this new once saved always saved doctrine in the church that says you can not lose your salvation, and you don't have to have works because salvation is not by works? That's not traditional once saved always saved teaching. You knew that, right?
You're not the first one to not want to answer the question. The person with no works is condemned by either answer.
I put 'believer' in single quotes to show I'm talking about the one who professes to be a believer aside from whether or not they truly are or not. So the question is quite legit.Been looking over the last posts here: interesting discussion, debate (!!!!), to say the least.
Easy question, Ralph:
There is no such thing as a believer who has no works. If there is no works, then there is no faith (belief), and if there is no belief, there is no believer! So it is impossible to actually answer either of your questions because the situation you are speaking of does not exist. There is not such a thing as a (true) believer who does not have works.
I put "true" in parentheses only to clarify. There is no difference between a true believer and a believer.
Not bearing fruit is a sin. The question is, do we live in a life of fruitlessness as a matter of lifestyle, like an unbeliever? That is the condition of the person Paul says will not inherit the kingdom. Grace is not a license so we can live in our old lives unchanged and still inherit the kingdom. But that is what many Christians think today. They think once saved always saved makes it so they can be unchanged and they will still be saved when Jesus comes back. They do not know that is the new once saved always saved doctrine. The traditional once saved always saved doctrine says the person who is still in their old life and/or does not endure to the end is not born again to begin with.Is not doing works a sin, Ralph?
Not bearing fruit is a sin
The traditional once saved always saved doctrine says the person who is still in their old life and/or does not endure to the end is not born again to begin with.
Precisely,Ralph is "looking for this non existent circumstance",and trying to insist that it "must be true""though it's not",I suppose there is always going to be at least one person warped concerning scripture.Been looking over the last posts here: interesting discussion, debate (!!!!), to say the least.
Easy question, Ralph:
There is no such thing as a believer who has no works. If there is no works, then there is no faith (belief), and if there is no belief, there is no believer! So it is impossible to actually answer either of your questions because the situation you are speaking of does not exist. There is not such a thing as a (true) believer who does not have works.
I put "true" in parentheses only to clarify. There is no difference between a true believer and a believer.
or the terms,"obsessive compulsive" and "delusional".Ever heard of the term "leading question"?
Christians have no sin, Ralph. The blood of Jesus washed them all away. Forgiven. Gone. Forever.
Endure to the end? You sound like a Calvinist. Jesus endured all that was required to save us, and to keep us, until the end. Yet we still have the old, sinful nature to contend with, Ralph. That's why you commit sins daily. Of course, when you commit them, it's not "living" in them - only when others do.
amen
otherwise there would be contradictions in the bible
but there is not
it flows in perfect harmony
1 John 3:9
9*Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
__
1 John 2
2*My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous:
2*And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.
I put 'believer' in single quotes to show I'm talking about the one who professes to be a believer aside from whether or not they truly are or not. So the question is quite legit.
And I see your vote must be for the second one. The 'believer' who has no works is not born again. That's what I've been saying in this thread, because that's what the Bible teaches. But as you've probably noticed I'm being beat up for saying it.
That is just another one of your misrepresentations. We ALL say a true believer will have works.I put 'believer' in single quotes to show I'm talking about the one who professes to be a believer aside from whether or not they truly are or not. So the question is quite legit.
And I see your vote must be for the second one. The 'believer' who has no works is not born again. That's what I've been saying in this thread, because that's what the Bible teaches. But as you've probably noticed I'm being beat up for saying it.
You use "church" here as a pejorative. The truth of course, is the exact opposite.
The "church" YOU speak of LOVES to have it's congregants live in a fearful state that they will do or NOT do something that will get them cast into hell.
This is how that type of church derives it's power. Both traditionally, and today.
God's born again Children, whom He will NEVER cast into hell, are eternally secure in His Son.
Please don't deny the redemptive work of His Son.
If your church is telling you that you must do works to be or stay saved, you should find a Church that preaches the TRUE Gospel, that will enable you to do the work God has prepared for you, with a joyful, thankful heart.
I put you on ignore because you absolutely simply brush off any scripture that contradicts your narrative, and the fact that you lied about what I believe. You have been called out time and time again regarding your lying, but you don't have the moral fortitude to admit it or apologize.
You claim "no attacks" yet call him a rabid dog again. (smh)
Ralph, you are the absolute King of fault finding. Seriously.
I don't have the time to read through the whole thread, so if you answered this before, please indulge me anyway.
Do you believe a born again Christian can lose their salvation for any reason?