FLAT EARTH
- Thread starter mcubed
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
P
pckts
Guest
Oh, so the argument is that when there isn't curvature some kind of magic "reverse fish eye" is used that causes no distortion whatsoever.
And when there is curvature, it's "REAL" curvature, despite the plain evidence everything else in the video is distorted by it.
I like this video, most of the cameras have a fish eye lenses, but the one inside the fuselage of the rocket is fixed, facing straight out the fuselage, so it nullifys any fish eye effect, and it turns, and there is still curve, plus it's a lot higher than just 120,000 feet 
[video=youtube;bDoh8zQDT38]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDoh8zQDT38&t=103s[/video]
[video=youtube;bDoh8zQDT38]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDoh8zQDT38&t=103s[/video]
You need to look at that video again there is a slight concave of the surface
the video you posted does show continous fish eye concave because the camera only pans left to right just a few inches, so yea there is no proof of a flat earth in that video
S
Seedz
Guest
I like this video, most of the cameras have a fish eye lenses, but the one inside the fuselage of the rocket is fixed, facing straight out the fuselage, so it nullifys any fish eye effect, and it turns, and there is still curve, plus it's a lot higher than just 120,000 feet
[video=youtube;bDoh8zQDT38]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDoh8zQDT38&t=103s[/video]
That is directly from GoPro.....
I'm just saying there's a very slim chance it may be doctored footage...
It could be, you're right, you can doctor GoPro any which way. I don't know, I'd like to try this sometime you know?
P
pckts
Guest
Fish eyes are in place when there isn't curvature, fish eyes are not in place when ther is curvature. Gotcha
Can you please analyze this video for me? You and all of your people ignore it every time I have posted it in the past.
It's only 2 minutes, and you only need to watch the first 1:30
[video=youtube;AWJpjgWoR1k]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWJpjgWoR1k[/video]
S
Seedz
Guest
I have wide knowledge in UAV and RC systems.
If you got the budget I can help you do something like this...
I have wide knowledge in UAV and RC systems.
If you got the budget I can help you do something like this...
That would be a ton of fun just to do. You know you support and work and supply the parts to rockets, but building one and flying it and attaching a camera to it, that wouldn't be too much do you think?
P
pckts
Guest
I like this video, most of the cameras have a fish eye lenses, but the one inside the fuselage of the rocket is fixed, facing straight out the fuselage, so it nullifys any fish eye effect, and it turns, and there is still curve, plus it's a lot higher than just 120,000 feet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDoh8zQDT38&t=103s
Can you explain to me why that footage looks nothing like this footage whatsoever?
[video=youtube;Ip2ZGND1I9Q]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip2ZGND1I9Q[/video]
Are they both real, or is one fake? Which one is fake? Why would they fake one?
S
Seedz
Guest
The biggest issue is the FAA, all unmanned civilian aircraft is capped at 400ft, unless you have special permission.
Now, you can do it, but the fallout may be intense....
If you do it with the intention to prove flat earth i guarantee you will hit a lot of brick walls.
If I had the budget and the time I would have already done something like this.
fish eye wasn't created when there is no curvature, that is creating a theory out of thin air.
Gotcha and the dude in the video, look at it closing there are no flippers want in the world is that dude saying,
another astronaut is taking the video, and there are no flippers in the vid. And the other dude has the same space suite on.
Last edited:
P
pckts
Guest
So an astronaut in a black suit risks his life outside in the vacuum of space to hold a camera and take footage (when a fixed camera could do the same thing)? This is what you believe?
Thanks for acknowledging the video, no one ever does that.
You say black suit, because your not thinking, because the other dude is behind the craft and not in direct sunlight, that was easy to debunk.
the spaceship doesn't have 1000 camera's all over the place really.
Last edited:
P
pckts
Guest
Oh so he is engulfed in shadow and appears to be wearing a black suit, something we have never seen before of an astronaut in a white suit. The silhouette is off as well.
And that footage is so important that astronaut venture out, uses resources, and risk their life in the vacuum of space to capture it.
That is what the space suit is for to protect the person in space, astronauts do space walking all the time in space.
he is behind the structure so yea the lighting and the silhouette will look different than the person who isn't behind a structure.
I explained the non-issue with time and date and with "credibility" of sources. Here is the link to my post, #526: http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/153876-earth-flat-stationary-27.html
You responded by changing the line on your map representing the southernmost transit of the sun's path, so that it would encompass Sydney, AU. In the same thread, #745, GaryA responded to you with a firm rebuke for your response.
I guess my recollection is not so "fantastical".
Eventually, you may learn that accusing others of dishonesty, while committing it yourself, wins you nothing but scorn.
By the way, you still haven't provided a sound explanation, but rather dodge and swerve from dealing with this rather inconvenient truth.
S
Seedz
Guest
Instead of putting people down with the whole "modernity" card, you should ask yourself why is it that we are far less refined as a society than we were 60 years ago.
P
pckts
Guest
Explain to me why it would be impossible for the sun to be in that location on a flat earth. Your entire question and challenge is meaningless, do you understand this? You are saying "look where the sun is", this disproves a flat earth". It doesn't disprove or prove anything at all. I have no idea what kind of answer you are looking for or why you think this means anything at all. You are severely confused and repeat this meaningless questions for months, you do not get an "answer" for it, because the question has no meaning.
Last edited: