Nor will you receive any from me because it is undue. You can get your validation from the several who are disobedient to Christ.
Yes, fully aware, but contained in it was your referencing others who have rightly called you out for your repudiation of church. That includes me, so it wasn't only Magenta you were addressing. It was others as well.
You sought validation of others who share your attitude about church which is why you put it out there. I'm here to invalidate that.
Anyhow, congrats! You got pats on the back for your stance against Christ and his church of which you were seeking affirmation.
OK, so what you said was true. What I said was also. You weren't just addressing Magenta, you took a swing at those who have called you out, seeking to garner approval for your stance, and disagreements toward those whose stance is biblical.
Basically it was all carnal and divisive, not to mention your unbiblical walk.
CC isn't a church, nor are you in church or attending church by typing on a keyboard in a forum.
You will stand before Christ and give an account of this, though, you think you're justified and that you will not.
I take it from the many likes you got here for your stance against Christ's bride, rebellion to His decree of assembly that many here as well do not attend church either and/or heartily support those who publicly rebel against the assembly.
That is shameful.
No one should be arguing theology on a forum who doesn't place themselves under the authority of a local church, because frankly they are behavioral heretics and hypocrites.
I will gladly continue on this stance even in the face of those who say they love Jesus and hate his bride, no matter how unpopular this biblical stance becomes among professing believers.
Yes, fully aware, but contained in it was your referencing others who have rightly called you out for your repudiation of church. That includes me, so it wasn't only Magenta you were addressing. It was others as well.
You sought validation of others who share your attitude about church which is why you put it out there. I'm here to invalidate that.
Anyhow, congrats! You got pats on the back for your stance against Christ and his church of which you were seeking affirmation.
OK, so what you said was true. What I said was also. You weren't just addressing Magenta, you took a swing at those who have called you out, seeking to garner approval for your stance, and disagreements toward those whose stance is biblical.
Basically it was all carnal and divisive, not to mention your unbiblical walk.
CC isn't a church, nor are you in church or attending church by typing on a keyboard in a forum.
You will stand before Christ and give an account of this, though, you think you're justified and that you will not.
I take it from the many likes you got here for your stance against Christ's bride, rebellion to His decree of assembly that many here as well do not attend church either and/or heartily support those who publicly rebel against the assembly.
That is shameful.
No one should be arguing theology on a forum who doesn't place themselves under the authority of a local church, because frankly they are behavioral heretics and hypocrites.
I will gladly continue on this stance even in the face of those who say they love Jesus and hate his bride, no matter how unpopular this biblical stance becomes among professing believers.
Enjoy your time here, it may get cut real short...I asked you not to pick on this new babe in Christ and your pride could not let it go.
You have been reported for this and the other post...chiding and placing this young babe in Christ in condemnation, the Bible says anyone in Christ Jesus is not under condemnation...
You have only yourself to blame for the report