Maybe what mailmandan had in his link will work here. I realize that this is a waste of time for those that replace Chrsit for the Sabbath day in the Old Testament but it will help those viewing the thread to avoid this perversion of the gospel of the grace of God in Christ.
Anyone who says to you that "You are sinning and dis-obeying God if you don't keep the Sabbath as in the Old Testament way is a Judaizing spirit that has come to distort the gospel."
Quote:
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]
[/TD]
[TD="width: 81%"]
Colossians 2:14-16 says the 10 commandments are abolished![/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Colossians 2:14-16 so clearly states the weekly Sabbath was nailed to cross and abolished that Sabbatarians are at a loss to know what to do with it!
"Having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us and which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross. When He had disarmed the rulers and authorities, He made a public display of them, having triumphed over them through Him. Therefore let no one act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day- things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ." (Col 2:14-16)
The Ten Commandments are called, Statutes, Ordinances and Decrees. To the shock and horror of Seventh-day Adventists, they will learn they have been lied to by their leaders and that the 10 commandments are the ordinances that were abolished in Col 2:14 and Eph 2:15.
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]
[/TD]
[TD="width: 79%"]
If Col 2:16 refers to the weekly Sabbath, then Sabbatarians are 100% refuted. Herein lies the battle ground. But as you will see, Sabbath keepers have little more than a few lame arguments that are easily falsified. Only the blind and deceived could miss the simple truth in Col 2:16.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
A. One of the most stunning and irrefutable proofs that Col 2:16 must be the weekly Sabbath day, is the common "Year, Month, Week" pattern used in Col 2:16.
When God wanted to refer to the whole system of Jewish holy days, rather than name them all, He would refer to the yearly, monthly and weekly as representing the whole system. Sabbatarians argue that the Sabbath Day of Col 2:16 is the years Sabbaths. But yearly Sabbaths were already referred to in Col 2:16 as "festivals". The "Year, Month, Week" pattern is so well established in the Old Testament, that Col 2:16 must refer to the weekly Sabbath. Notice, even Gal 4:10, following this pattern, states the weekly Sabbath is abolished!
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 4"]
Yearly, monthly, weekly pattern proves it is the weekly sabbath[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD="width: 25%"]Yearly [/TD]
[TD="width: 24%"]monthly [/TD]
[TD="width: 17%"]weekly [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 34%"]1 Chronicles 23:31 [/TD]
[TD="width: 25%"]
fixed festivals [/TD]
[TD="width: 24%"]new moons[/TD]
[TD="width: 17%"]
Sabbaths [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 34%"]2 Chronicles 2:4 [/TD]
[TD="width: 25%"]
appointed feasts [/TD]
[TD="width: 24%"]new moons[/TD]
[TD="width: 17%"]
Sabbaths [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 34%"]2 Chronicles 8:13 [/TD]
[TD="width: 25%"]
annual feasts[/TD]
[TD="width: 24%"]new moons[/TD]
[TD="width: 17%"]
Sabbaths [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 34%"]2 Chronicles 31:3 [/TD]
[TD="width: 25%"]
fixed festivals [/TD]
[TD="width: 24%"]new moons[/TD]
[TD="width: 17%"]
Sabbaths [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 34%"]Nehemiah 10:33[/TD]
[TD="width: 25%"]
appointed times[/TD]
[TD="width: 24%"]new moon[/TD]
[TD="width: 17%"]
Sabbaths [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 34%"]Isa 1:13-14[/TD]
[TD="width: 25%"]
Appointed feasts[/TD]
[TD="width: 24%"]New moon [/TD]
[TD="width: 17%"]
Sabbath[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 34%"]Ezekiel 45:17[/TD]
[TD="width: 25%"]
appointed feasts[/TD]
[TD="width: 24%"]new moons[/TD]
[TD="width: 17%"]
Sabbaths [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 34%"]Ezek 46:1-11[/TD]
[TD="width: 25%"]
appointed feasts[/TD]
[TD="width: 24%"]new moons[/TD]
[TD="width: 17%"]
Sabbath[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 34%"]Hosea 2:11[/TD]
[TD="width: 25%"]
festal assemblies [/TD]
[TD="width: 24%"]new moons[/TD]
[TD="width: 17%"]
Sabbaths [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 34%"]Galatians 4:10[/TD]
[TD="width: 25%"]
years[/TD]
[TD="width: 24%"]months [/TD]
[TD="width: 17%"]
days[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 34%"]Colossians 2:16[/TD]
[TD="width: 25%"]
festival[/TD]
[TD="width: 24%"]new moon [/TD]
[TD="width: 17%"]
Sabbath day
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
B. All Sabbatarians are taught by their pastors, the false argument that the Plural "sabbaton" in Col 2:16 cannot refer to weekly Sabbath day. But as we can clearly see, there are at least 5 other places where the plural is used of the weekly Sabbath. The deception is even worse, given the fact that while most Seventh-day Adventist pastors know about these other passages, they do not tell their people in the pews!
- Matthew 28:1, "Now after the Sabbath" [Greek- plural: sabbaton]
- Luke 4:16, "He entered the synagogue on the Sabbath" [Greek- plural: sabbaton]
- Acts 16:13, "And on the Sabbath day" [Greek- plural: sabbaton]
- Exodus 20:8 (in Septuagint) "Remember the Sabbath day" [Greek- plural: sabbaton]
- Leviticus 23:37-38 (in Septuagint) "besides those of the Sabbaths of the Lord" [Greek- plural: sabbaton]
C. Some Sabbatarians will put forth another false argument saying, "The lack of the definite article before the word "Sabbath" in the Greek in Col 2:16 proves it cannot refer to the weekly Sabbath. Of course this argument is no more valid than the one above regarding the plural "sabbaton".
The truth is, we find several places where the weekly Sabbath lacks the definite article. An example of a definite article is the word THE in the following sentence: "Only Jews kept THE weekly Sabbath." The same sentence that lacks the definite article would be: "Only Jews kept weekly Sabbath." Or "Only Jews kept a weekly Sabbath."
- Matthew 28:1, "Now after the Sabbath" [Sabbath lacks article in original Greek]
- John 5:9, "Now it was the Sabbath on that day" [Sabbath lacks article in original Greek]
- John 5:10, "It is the Sabbath" [Sabbath lacks article in original Greek]
- John 5:16, "on the Sabbath" [Sabbath lacks article in original Greek]
D. A final false objection Sabbath keepers will sometimes raise against Col 2:14-16 referring to the weekly Sabbath, is the fact v14 calls that which was nailed to the cross "hostile to us". Sabbatarians continue to falsely argue: "The weekly Sabbath was not hostile to us!" However, 2 Cor 3:7 calls the entire ten commandment law, a "ministry of death". This effectively refutes their false argument!
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: #FFFF00, colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
Col 2:14 [/TD]
[TD="width: 50%"]
2 Cor 3:7 [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 50%"]having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us and
which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross. [/TD]
[TD="width: 50%"]But if the
ministry of death, in letters engraved on stones, came with glory, so that the sons of Israel could not look intently at the face of Moses because of the glory of his face [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 50%"]
which was hostile to us[/TD]
[TD="width: 50%"]
ministry of death[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]
Sabbatarians have overlooked the fact that the 10 commandments were called a "ministry of death" What is the difference between "hostile to us" and "ministry of death"?
Source
Col 2:14-16 clearly teaches that the sabbath was abolished and nailed to cross!
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]